Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

HYPOTHESIS During the past 10 years, expertise with minimally invasive techniques has grown, leading to an increase in successful laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) even in the setting of massive and supramassive spleens. DESIGN Retrospective series of patients who underwent splenectomy from November 1, 1995, to August 31, 2005. SETTING Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS Adult patients who underwent elective splenectomy as their primary procedure (n = 111). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Demographics, spleen size and weight, conversion from LS to open splenectomy, postoperative length of stay, and perioperative complications and mortality. Massive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 17 cm or weight more than 600 g, and supramassive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 22 cm or weight more than 1600 g. RESULTS Eighty-five (77%) of the 111 patients underwent LS. Of these 85 patients, 25 (29%) had massive or supramassive spleens. These accounted for 40% of LSs performed in 2004 and 50% in 2005. Despite this increase in giant spleens, the conversion rate for massive or supramassive spleens has declined from 33% prior to 1999 to 0% in 2004 and 2005. Since January 2004 at our institution, all of the massive or supramassive spleens have been removed with a laparoscopic approach. Patients with massive or supramassive spleens who underwent LS had no reoperations for bleeding or deaths and had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (mean postoperative length of stay, 3.8 days for patients who underwent LS vs 9.0 days for patients who underwent open splenectomy; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite conflicting reports regarding the safety of LS for massive splenomegaly, our data indicate that with increasing institutional experience, the laparoscopic approach is safe, shortens the length of stay, and improves mortality.

[1]  S. Kitano,et al.  Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy. , 2005, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

[2]  R. Cacchione,et al.  Experience with seven cases of massive splenomegaly. , 2004, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[3]  N. O'Rourke,et al.  Massive Splenomegaly Is Associated With Significant Morbidity After Laparoscopic Splenectomy , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[4]  B. Heniford,et al.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[5]  A. Lacy,et al.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in cases of splenomegaly: a comparison analysis with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[6]  A. Lacy,et al.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in cases of splenomegaly , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[7]  J. Ponsky,et al.  Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy based on hematologic indication , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  A. Park,et al.  Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Normal-Sized Spleens versus Splenomegaly: Does Size Matter? , 2001, The American surgeon.

[9]  A Park,et al.  Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[10]  E. Targarona,et al.  Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome. A comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery. , 1999, Surgical endoscopy.

[11]  R. Schlinkert,et al.  Laparoscopic splenectomy , 2015 .

[12]  J. Mamazza,et al.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: lessons from the learning curve. , 1998, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[13]  J. Hiatt,et al.  Laparoscopic or open splenectomy for hematologic disease: which approach is superior? , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  S. Mulvihill,et al.  Laparoscopic splenectomy. The emerging standard. , 1997, Surgical endoscopy.