The Must-Have in Robotic Heart Surgery: Haptic Feedback

The minimally invasive endoscopic surgery was introduced in the late 1980s in the abdominal surgery as revolutionary surgical technique (Voges et al., 1997). Surgeons no longer needed to physically place their hands within the body to perform an operation. In minimal invasive surgery, instruments and viewing equipments are inserted into the body through small incisions. Long manipulators are used to perform operations under manual guidance. This does not only minimize the collateral surgical trauma of an access incision but results also in quicker recovery. In heart surgery the introduction of endoscopic techniques were promising, but not satisfying like the application of robots in other surgical disciplines (Bholat et al., 1999; Gutt et al., 2004; Mitsuishi et al., 2000). Complex cardiac surgery had to be performed by long instruments without tremor filter or adequate freedom of movement, so satisfactory results were missing. In heart surgery pure endoscopic techniques have not established since the demanded high precision in this speciality did not reached with endoscopic instruments only. The promise of telemanipulated endoscopic assistance was to eliminate many of the beginning impediments, with the concurrent enhancements of motion scaling, tremor filtration, 3-dimensional vision and fulcrum effect. The surgeon could now operate with a surgical mechatronic assist system in a comfortable, dextrous and intuitive manner. The solution for the initial problems was the implementation of telemanipulators that offer with the endoscopic instruments as much degrees of freedom in movement as the hand of the surgeon in conventional open surgery performing 6 degrees of freedom instead of four in conventional endoscopic instruments. Furthermore the telemanipulator had to dispose of 3D-optic and a filter of tremor (Suematsu & Del Nido, 2004). The new system has been a telesystem controlled remotely by the surgeon. The implementation of totally endoscopic heart surgery was realised ten years later with the telemanipulator Da Vinci® (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) after introducing endoscopic surgery in abdominal surgery. Nevertheless technical limitations still exist that limit the application in special heart diseases and surgical indications in expert medical centres only. O pe n A cc es s D at ab as e w w w .ite ch on lin e. co m

[1]  A. García-Ruiz,et al.  Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft. , 1997, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[2]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Robotics for surgery. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  P‐J Fager,et al.  The use of haptics in medical applications , 2004, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[4]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Mamoru Mitsuishi,et al.  Tele-micro-surgery system with intelligent user interface , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[6]  Pedro J del Nido,et al.  Robotic pediatric cardiac surgery: present and future perspectives. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[7]  T. Krummel,et al.  Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  J M Thompson,et al.  Human factors in telesurgery: effects of time delay and asynchrony in video and control feedback with local manipulative assistance. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  Alois Knoll,et al.  An experimental system for robotic heart surgery , 2005, 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'05).

[10]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Evaluation of a laparoscopic grasper with force feedback. , 2003, Surgical endoscopy.

[11]  A Kashfi,et al.  Robot‐assisted abdominal surgery , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  J. Fann,et al.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  E. Hanly,et al.  Twenty-first century surgery using twenty-first century technology: surgical robotics. , 2004, Current surgery.

[14]  H. Mayer,et al.  Experimentelle Evaluation haptischer Rückmeldung eines robotergestützten Systems für minimal-invasive Herzchirurgie , 2005 .

[15]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Telemanipulator Enhanced Heart Surgery: Implementation of Autonomous Procedures , 2005 .

[16]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  A Novel Approach to Robotic Cardiac Surgery Using Haptics and Vision , 2002 .

[17]  R Bauernschmitt,et al.  Towards robotic heart surgery: introduction of autonomous procedures into an experimental surgical telemanipulator system , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[18]  Luc Soler,et al.  A new robotic system for CT-guided percutaneous procedures with haptic feedback , 2004, CARS.

[19]  Josef Wiemeyer Flimmerverschmelzungsfrequenz und zentralnervöse Aktivierung , 2002 .

[20]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Real-time matching of angiographies with in situ heart image sequences , 2004, Proceedings. 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[21]  D. Yuh,et al.  Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. , 2004, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[22]  S. M. Wildhirta,et al.  Evaluation of haptic in robotic heart surgery , 2005 .

[23]  J. Bowersox,et al.  Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: an experimental study. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[24]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[25]  Dong-Soo Kwon,et al.  Microsurgical telerobot system , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[26]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Robotic System to Evaluate Force Feedback in Minimally Invasive Computer Aided Surgery , 2004 .

[27]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Evaluation of Force Feedback in Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery , 2004 .

[28]  J Dargahi,et al.  Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing—a review , 2004, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[29]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Robotics for telesurgery: second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[30]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  Robotic cardiac surgery: present and future applications. , 2002, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[32]  H. Mayer,et al.  Automatic coronary artery detection on in situ heart images , 2004, Computers in Cardiology, 2004.