Update on peripheral nerve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of spinal pathology. Tethered cord syndrome is an under-diagnosed condition of abnormally rigid fixation of the spinal cord that results in spinal cord tension leading to ischemia. It can be the cause of incontinence, scoliosis, and chronic back and leg pain. In situations of spinal cord tether owing to fatty filum or tight filum terminale, the symptoms can be relieved by sectioning of the filum. We present a novel, minimally invasive technique for surgical untethering of the spinal cord by filum sectioning. The pathophysiology of tethered spinal cord and the advantages of minimally invasive surgical management of this entity are discussed. METHODS: Three patients (ages 14, 35, and 46 yr) presented with long-standing leg and back pain and neuroradiological features of tethered cord syndrome and thickened, fatty filum terminale. Two patients presented with scoliosis and, upon further history, had subclinical incontinence; one of these patients had abnormal urodynamic studies. RESULTS: All three patients underwent a minimally invasive approach to the L4/L5 level using the X-tube (Medtronic, Inc., Memphis, TN). A laminotomy was performed and the dura exposed. The dura was then opened and intradural microdissection delivered the fatty filum into the durotomy. Electrical stimulation was performed while the lower extremities and the anal sphincter were monitored for electromyographic activity. After acquisition of positive controls, the filum was identified by the lack of sphincter and lower extremity electromyographic responses and was then cauterized and cut. Dura was repaired with the use of endoscopic instrumentation. All patients had significant improvement of their leg and back pain, and one patient had resolution of the abnormal urodynamics. CONCLUSION: Tethered spinal cords can be safely and effectively untethered using minimally invasive surgery. This technique provides the advantage of reduced soft tissue injury, less postoperative pain, minimal blood loss, a smaller incision, and a shorter hospitalization. The minimal amount of tissue injury generated by this technique may also provide the added advantage of reduced scar formation and risk of retethering.

[1]  A. Chhabra,et al.  Anatomic MR Imaging and Functional Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Peripheral Nerve Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  A. Chhabra Magnetic resonance neurography-simple guide to performance and interpretation. , 2013, Seminars in roentgenology.

[3]  A. Stemmer-Rachamimov,et al.  Update from the 2011 International Schwannomatosis Workshop: From genetics to diagnostic criteria , 2013, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[4]  A. Belzberg,et al.  Nerve transfers for restoration of upper extremity motor function in a child with upper extremity motor deficits due to transverse myelitis: Case report , 2012, Microsurgery.

[5]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  K. Woertler Tumors and tumor-like lesions of peripheral nerves. , 2010, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[7]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging to assess axonal regeneration in peripheral nerves , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes. , 2010, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects--normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Nerve transfers for brachial plexus reconstruction. , 2008, Hand clinics.

[11]  C. H. Bush,et al.  Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: Molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.

[12]  Jun Hu,et al.  Microsurgical anatomy of dorsal root entry zone of brachial plexus , 2008, Microsurgery.

[13]  J. Henke,et al.  Surgical Therapy of Peripheral Nerve Lesions: Current Status and New Perspectives , 2007, Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie.

[14]  B. Marincek,et al.  Peripheral neuropathies of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves: MR imaging features. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Peter T. Nelson,et al.  Management of patients with schwannomatosis: report of six cases and review of the literature. , 2004, Surgical neurology.

[16]  A. Shin,et al.  Nerve transfers for brachial plexus injuries , 2004 .

[17]  K. Maravilla,et al.  Imaging of the peripheral nervous system: evaluation of peripheral neuropathy and plexopathy. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  J. Tsuruda,et al.  Magnetic resonance neurography , 1993, The Lancet.

[19]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve , 1988 .

[20]  S SUNDERLAND,et al.  A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. , 1951, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  C. Fernández-Carballal,et al.  Treatment of neuropathic deafferentation pain using DREZ lesions; long-term results. , 2011, Neurologia.

[22]  R. García-Leal,et al.  Treatment of neuropathic deafferentation pain using DREZ lesions; long-term results ☆ , 2011 .

[23]  Maria Siemionow,et al.  Chapter 8: Current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. , 2009, International review of neurobiology.

[24]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Management of Childhood Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor , 2007, Paediatric drugs.