Commitment and Dispatch With Uncertain Wind Generation by Dynamic Programming

Fluctuating wind production over short time periods is balanced by adjusting generation from thermal plants to meet demand. Thermal ramp rates are limited, so increased variation in wind output as wind penetration increases can add to system operating costs because of the need for more thermal operating reserves. Traditional deterministic modeling techniques fail to fully capture these extra costs. We propose a stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) approach to unit commitment and dispatch, minimizing operating costs by making optimal unit commitment, dispatch, and storage decisions in the face of uncertain wind generation. The SDP solution is compared with two other solutions: 1) that of a deterministic dynamic program with perfect wind predictions to find the cost of imperfect information, and 2) that of a simulation model run under a decision rule, derived from Monte Carlo simulations of the deterministic model, to assess the cost of suboptimal stochastic decision making. An example Netherlands application shows that these costs can amount to several percent of total production costs, depending on installed wind capacity. These are the conclusions of a single simplified case study. Nonetheless, the results indicate that efforts to improve wind forecasting and to develop stochastic commitment models may be highly beneficial.

[1]  Geothermal Energy Western Wind and Solar Integration Study , 2010 .

[2]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning , 1995 .

[3]  Ana Estanqueiro,et al.  Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration , 2008 .

[4]  Erik Ela,et al.  The evolution of wind power integration studies: Past, present, and future , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Lennart Söder,et al.  On methodology for modelling wind power impact on power systems , 2008 .

[6]  G. Papaefthymiou,et al.  MCMC for Wind Power Simulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is dynamic programming? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  The Next Generation of Electric Power Unit Commitment Models , 2013 .

[11]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Locational-based coupling of electricity markets: benefits from coordinating unit commitment and balancing markets , 2011 .

[12]  W. Ackooij,et al.  Dynamic Constraints for Aggregated Units: Formulation and Application , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Electricity market modeling trends , 2005 .

[15]  C. Weber,et al.  The costs of wind's intermittency in Germany: application of a stochastic electricity market model , 2007 .

[16]  E.A. DeMeo,et al.  Utility Wind Integration and Operating Impact State of the Art , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  W.L. Kling,et al.  Impacts of Wind Power on Thermal Generation Unit Commitment and Dispatch , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[18]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch , 1993 .

[19]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Volatile Wind Power Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.