A new steel framing system for seismic protection of timber platform frame buildings. Implementation with hysteretic energy dissipators

This paper describes a new seismic protection system for timber platform frame buildings, either for new construction or retrofit. The system consists in connecting the timber frame to a steel structure that includes hysteretic energy dissipators designed to absorb most of the seismic input energy thus protecting the timber frame and the other steel members; alternatively, the system might use other types of dissipative devices. The steel structure consists of four steel stacks (located at each of the four facades) and steel collectors embracing each slab; the stacks and the collectors are connected, at each floor level, through the energy dissipators. The steel structure is self-supporting, that is, the timber frame is not affected by horizontal actions and can be designed without accounting for any seismic provision; in turn, the steel members do not participate in the main load-carrying system. The timber-steel interface is designed to avoid any stress concentration in the transfer of horizontal forces and to guarantee that the yielding of the dissipators occurs prior to any timber failure. The energy dissipation capacity of the suggested system is discussed, and an application example on a six-story timber building is presented; this case corresponds to highly demanding conditions because of the relatively large building height and weight, the high local seismicity, and the soft soil condition. This research belongs to a wider project aiming to promote the structural use of timber by improving the seismic capacity of wooden buildings; this research includes experiments and advanced numerical simulation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Piazza,et al.  Seismic behavior and retrofitting of joints in traditional timber roof structures , 2002 .

[2]  Dora Foti,et al.  Numerical efficiency assessment of energy dissipators for seismic protection of buildings , 1998 .

[3]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Light-Frame Wood Building , 2010 .

[4]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Analytical predictions of the seismic response of friction damped timber shear walls , 1990 .

[5]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Collapse testing and analysis of a light-frame wood garage wall , 2012 .

[6]  Michael D. Symans,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Wood-framed Structures with Viscous Fluid Dampers , 2004 .

[7]  G. Manfredi Evaluation of seismic energy demand , 2001 .

[8]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections , 2010 .

[9]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Six-Story Light-Frame Wood Building , 2010 .

[10]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  The Dynamic Response of Wood-Frame Shear Walls with Viscoelastic Dampers , 1999 .

[11]  Satoshi Yamada,et al.  Evaluation of plastic energy dissipation capacity of steel beams suffering ductile fracture under various loading histories , 2011 .

[12]  Frank Lam,et al.  Reversed-cyclic behavior of a novel heavy timber tube connection , 2006 .

[13]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental seismic investigation of a full-scale woodframe building , 2008 .

[14]  Gary F. Dargush,et al.  Computational Framework for Automated Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Self-Centering Connections , 2014 .

[15]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[16]  A. Martelli MODERN SEISMIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS FOR CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES , 2006 .

[17]  A. Benavent‐Climent,et al.  Design energy input spectra for moderate‐seismicity regions , 2002 .

[18]  A. Benavent‐Climent,et al.  Design energy input spectra for moderate-to-high seismicity regions based on Colombian earthquakes , 2010 .

[19]  T. Hoekstra Multi-storey timber-frame building- modelling the racking stiffness of timber-frame shear-walls , 2012 .

[20]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy , 1994 .

[21]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  An energy-based method for seismic retrofit of existing frames using hysteretic dampers , 2011 .

[22]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Limit Design of Structures to Resist Earthquakes , 1956 .

[23]  Stuart G. Park,et al.  Seismic design of New Zealand houses , 2004 .

[24]  A. Benavent-Climent,et al.  Design energy input spectra for high seismicity regions based on Turkish registers , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[25]  Fabrizio Mollaioli,et al.  An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand , 2001 .

[26]  F. López-Almansa,et al.  A low-tech dissipative buckling restrained brace. Design, analysis, production and testing , 2009 .

[27]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structures , 2003 .

[28]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  Prediction of earthquake energy input from smoothed fourier amplitude spectrum , 1994 .

[29]  Christopher Higgins,et al.  Hysteretic Dampers for Wood Frame Shear Walls , 2001 .

[30]  Michael D. Symans,et al.  Base Isolation and Supplemental Damping Systems for Seismic Protection of Wood Structures: Literature Review , 2002 .

[31]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Hysteretic damping of wood framed buildings , 2003 .