Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sanjay Yadav | Rahul Kumar | Abid Haleem | Jasveer Singh | Lalit Kumar | Shanay Rab | Afaqul Zafer | P. K. Dubey | Raman Sharma
[1] M. Bergoglio,et al. Final report on key comparison CCM.P-K13 in the range 50 MPa to 500 MPa of hydraulic gauge pressure , 2005 .
[2] Raghu N. Kacker,et al. Bayesian alternative to the ISO-GUM's use of the Welch–Satterthwaite formula , 2006 .
[3] Maurice G. Cox,et al. The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty , 2006 .
[4] Sanjay Yadav,et al. Final report on APMP.SIM.M.P-K7: Bilateral comparison between NIST (USA) and NPLI (India) in the hydraulic pressure region 40 MPa to 200 MPa , 2006 .
[5] Sanjay Yadav,et al. Intercomparison of National Hydraulic Pressure Standards up to 500 MPa , 2002 .
[6] Rajesh Kumar,et al. FEA-Based Design Studies for Development of Diaphragm Force Transducers , 2018, MAPAN.
[7] A. K. Bandyopadhyay,et al. Evaluation of Associated Uncertainties in Calibration of Direct Pressure Indicating Electromechanical Devices , 2005 .
[8] S. Yadav,et al. Characterization of dead weight testers and computation of associated uncertainties: a case study of contemporary techniques , 2007 .
[9] Rajesh Kumar,et al. Design, development and characterization of MEMS silicon diaphragm force sensor , 2018, Vacuum.
[10] Leonard Steinborn,et al. International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .