Management of Poor Performance: A Comparison of Manager, Group Member, and Group Disciplinary Decisions

Managers and 231 members of 41 work groups representing 4 diverse organizations participated in an experiment involving disciplinary decisions. Managers and group members responded individually to scenarios describing a group member's poor performance, followed by group members meeting to reach consensus on the disciplinary decisions. As hypothesized, manager disciplinary decisions were more severe than decisions made by individual group members. Contrary to predictions, the severity of manager and group disciplinary decisions did not differ. A test of choice shifts revealed that when the prevailing view among individual group members was for a relatively lenient disciplinary action, the group consensus decision was more severe than the average of the individual decisions. Attributions and outcome seriousness were found to influence the severity of manager, group member, and group decisions.

[1]  C. Urquhart,et al.  The impact of information. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[2]  The Impact of Reward Interdependency on the Synergogy Model of Cooperative Performance , 1993 .

[3]  J. Yates.  Risk-taking behavior , 1992 .

[4]  Donald B. Fedor,et al.  Investigating Supervisor Attributions of Subordinate Performance , 1989 .

[5]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The impact of information on small group choice. , 1997 .

[6]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  The Leader/Member Attribution Process , 1987 .

[7]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Role of the rater in performance appraisal. , 1974 .

[8]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[9]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[10]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[11]  R. Martell,et al.  A comparison of the behavioral rating accuracy of groups and individuals , 1993 .

[12]  D. G. Pruitt.  Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[13]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[14]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[15]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND CONSENSUS IN EFFECTIVENESS MODELS , 1988 .

[16]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  When We Don’t See Eye to Eye: Discrepancies between Supervisors and Subordinates in Absence Disciplinary Decisions , 1995 .

[17]  P. Greenfield,et al.  How Arbitration Works. , 1953 .

[18]  Robert E. Wood,et al.  Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model☆ , 1980 .

[19]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. , 1991 .

[20]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Gail T. Fairhurst,et al.  Managerial Control Strategies for Poor Performance over Time and the Impact on Subordinate Reactions , 1995 .

[22]  B. Rosen,et al.  Factors influencing disciplinary judgments. , 1974 .

[23]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions. , 1979 .

[24]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  The Social Effects of Punishment in Organizations: A Justice Perspective , 1992 .

[25]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  A Policy-Capturing Approach to Individuals' Decisions to Be Absent , 1994 .

[26]  H. N. Wheeler,et al.  MANAGERIAL DECISION MAKING ABOUT EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE: A POLICY‐CAPTURING APPROACH , 1990 .

[27]  J. P. Craiger,et al.  Effectiveness of the direct product versus confirmatory factor model for reflecting the structure of multimethod-multirater job performance data. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[29]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[30]  Gail T. Fairhurst,et al.  Chains of poor performance and supervisory control , 1986 .

[31]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of job experience on supervisor attributions for a subordinate's poor performance. , 1982 .

[32]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[33]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Group process and productivity , 1992 .

[34]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[35]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[36]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. , 1995 .

[37]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. , 1995 .

[38]  L. Danielson,et al.  An evaluation of two approaches to discipline in industry. , 1956 .

[39]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. , 1998 .

[40]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Social Comparison Theory and the Evaluation of Peer Evaluations: A Review and Some Applied Implications. , 1983 .

[41]  T. Mitchell,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF GROUP INTERDEPENDENCE ON SUPERVISOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS , 1983 .

[42]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[43]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Use of leadership powers in industry. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings , 1995 .

[45]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. , 1976 .

[46]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Accountability and Helping: When Needs Exceed Resources. , 1978 .

[47]  B. Bass.  Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed. , 1990 .

[48]  Dow Scott,et al.  Teams: Why some succeed and others fail , 1994 .

[49]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. , 1989 .

[50]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  Assignment of Credit and Blame for Performance Outcomes , 1993 .

[51]  John J. Lawler,et al.  A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. , 1983 .

[52]  D. P. Leyden,et al.  Familiarity and Group Productivity , 1991 .

[53]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[54]  J. R. Larson.  The performance feedback process: A preliminary model , 1984 .

[55]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[56]  D. Bem,et al.  Group influence on individual risk taking. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[57]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[58]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[59]  Michael D. Crino,et al.  Effects of initial tendency and real risk on choice shift , 1992 .

[60]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[61]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[62]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[63]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Punishment from the Manager's Perspective: A Grounded Investigation and Inductive Model , 1996 .

[64]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. , 1989 .

[65]  J. Aronoff,et al.  The Effects of Task-Group Experiences on Subsequent Prosocial Behavior , 1984 .

[66]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Distance in organizations , 1993 .

[67]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[68]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[69]  Robert L. Cardy,et al.  Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives , 1993 .

[70]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[71]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Group risk taking: Selected topics. , 1992 .

[72]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups : Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams , 1996 .

[73]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[74]  Patricia M. Fandt,et al.  The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically , 1990 .

[75]  A. Denisi,et al.  Potential Problems with Peer Ratings , 1983 .

[76]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[77]  R. Liden,et al.  Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .

[78]  R E Wood,et al.  Manager behavior in a social context: the impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. , 1981, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[79]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[80]  John M. Levine,et al.  Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. , 1989 .

[81]  R. Liden,et al.  Contextual and attributional influences on control decisions. , 1980 .

[82]  Nancy Paule Melone,et al.  The base-rate fallacy : contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment , 1990 .

[83]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[84]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  LEADER ATTRIBUTIONS AND EVALUATIONS - EFFECTS OF LOCUS OF CONTROL, SUPERVISORY CONTROL, AND TASK CONTROL , 1994 .