Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CT.

Current PET/MR systems employ segmentation of MR images and subsequent assignment of empirical attenuation coefficients for quantitative PET reconstruction. In this study we examine the differences in the quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake in the carotid arteries between PET/MR and PET/CT scanners. Five comparisons were performed to asses differences in PET quantification: i) PET/MR MR-based AC (MRAC) versus PET/MR CTAC, ii) PET/MR MRAC versus PET/CT, iii) PET/MR MRAC with carotid coil versus PET/MR MRAC without coil, iv) PET/MR MRAC scan 2 versus PET/MR MRAC scan 1, and v) PET/MR CTAC versus PET/CT. Standardized uptakes values (SUV) mean and SUV maximum were calculated for six regions-of-interests: left and right carotid arteries, left and right lungs, spine and muscle. Pearson's Correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare SUV mean and maximum within each ROI of each patient. PET/MR emission data reconstructed with MRAC versus PET/MR emission data reconstructed with CTAC had percent differences of SUV mean ranging from -2.0% (Absolute Difference, -0.02) to 7.4% (absolute difference, 0.06). Percent differences within the carotid arteries proved to correlate well with differences of SUV mean of 5.4% (Absolute Difference, 0.07) in the left carotid and 2.7% (Absolute Difference, 0.03) in the right carotid. Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman of PET/MR with MRAC versus PET/MR with CTAC showed high correlation between SUV mean (R(2)=0.80, mean difference 0.03 ± 0.18 SUV, p=0.3382), demonstrating excellent correlation within ROIs analyzed. The results of this study support the use of (18)F-FDG PET/MR for quantitative measure of inflammation in the carotid arteries.

[1]  David Izquierdo-Garcia,et al.  Preclinical Evaluation of MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction on a Sequential Whole-Body MR/PET Scanner , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[2]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[3]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Debashish Pal,et al.  Attenuation correction for MR table and coils for a sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[7]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[8]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging: MR-based attenuation correction of local radiofrequency surface coils. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: 18F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Application of the row action maximum likelihood algorithm with spherical basis functions to clinical PET imaging , 2001 .

[13]  J. L. Vercher-Conejero,et al.  N staging of lung cancer patients with PET/MRI using a three-segment model attenuation correction algorithm: Initial experience , 2013, European Radiology.

[14]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Philip M Robson,et al.  Attenuation Correction for Flexible Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined Magnetic Resonance/Positron Emission Tomography Imaging , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Gudrun Wagenknecht,et al.  MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  Andrea Soricelli,et al.  Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Evelyn Wenkel,et al.  Toward simultaneous PET/MR breast imaging: systematic evaluation and integration of a radiofrequency breast coil. , 2013, Medical physics.

[19]  Sameer Bansilal,et al.  Atherosclerosis Inflammation Imaging with 18F-FDG PET: Carotid, Iliac, and Femoral Uptake Reproducibility, Quantification Methods, and Recommendations , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  C. Claussen,et al.  Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging--pilot study. , 2012, Radiology.

[21]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  The Vascular Biology of Atherosclerosis and Imaging Targets , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  V. Fuster,et al.  (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is highly reproducible: implications for atherosclerosis therapy trials. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Stephan G Nekolla,et al.  Attenuation correction for PET/MR: problems, novel approaches and practical solutions. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[24]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[25]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  D W Townsend,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[27]  Liselotte Højgaard,et al.  Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT. , 2013, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[28]  M. Uder,et al.  Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[30]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[31]  M. Forsting,et al.  Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[32]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Integrated PET/MR imaging: automatic attenuation correction of flexible RF coils. , 2013, Medical physics.

[33]  David Izquierdo-Garcia,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Magnetic Resonance-Guided [18-F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Human Carotid Arteries: Reproducibility, Partial Volume Correction, and Correlation Between Methods , 2009, Stroke.

[34]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction , 2013, Magma.

[35]  David Izquierdo-Garcia,et al.  Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..