The epistemological nature of archaeological units

Understanding the epistemological nature of archaeological units, or types, is critical to archaeological research. Two aspects of units underpin the issue. First, ideational units must not be conflated with empirical units. Ideational units are units of measurement; empirical units are the things being measured. Ideational units can be either theoretical or descriptional. Theoretical units, as their name implies, are derived from a theoretical basis, and their utility for a specific analytical purpose must be tested. Descriptional units are not derived from theory and are not attached to an analytical purpose, although they may serve the purpose of communication. Second, theoretical units must be defined intensionally, through explicit listing of their diagnostic attributes. Most extant archaeological units have been extensionally derived from the specimens included in a unit, and often comprise descriptive as well as definitive attributes, without distinction between the two. The conflation of theoretical and empirical units remains a serious problem in archaeology.

[1]  R. Snodgrass,et al.  SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS , 2003 .

[2]  Michael J. O'Brien,et al.  The rise and fall of culture history , 2002 .

[3]  B. Trigger.  James A. Ford and the growth of Americanist archaeology , 2001 .

[4]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Cladistics Is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States , 2001 .

[5]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Setting the Agenda for American Archaeology: The National Research Council Archaeological Conferences of 1929, 1932, and 1935 , 2001 .

[6]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  The legacy of culture history in the Southeastern United States , 2000 .

[7]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Chronometers and Units in Early Archaeology and Paleontology , 2000, American Antiquity.

[8]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach , 2000 .

[9]  Michael J. O'Brien,et al.  Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating , 1999 .

[10]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Americanist Stratigraphic Excavation and the Measurement of Culture Change , 1999 .

[11]  Michael J. O'Brien,et al.  The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology , 1998, Current Anthropology.

[12]  Beryl J. Williams.  Study in Archaeology , 1998 .

[13]  J. B. Griffin,et al.  From Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Valley, 1940–1947 , 1997 .

[14]  A. Kroeber.  The Culture-Area and Age-Area Concepts of Clark Wissler , 1997 .

[15]  J. B. Griffin,et al.  Report of the Conference on Southeastern Pottery Typology , 1997 .

[16]  F. West,et al.  American beginnings : the prehistory and palaeoecology of Beringia , 1996 .

[17]  R. Zink.  Species concepts, speciation, and sexual selection , 1996 .

[18]  E. Mayr.  Systems of ordering data , 1995 .

[19]  Marc Ereshefsky,et al.  Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation , 1992, American Antiquity.

[21]  Marc Ereshefsky.  Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution , 1991, Philosophy of Science.

[22]  Charlotte Beck,et al.  Bias and Archaeological Classification , 1989, American Antiquity.

[23]  R. Dunnell.  Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification , 1986 .

[24]  J. L. Chartkoff,et al.  Archaeology of California , 1984 .

[25]  E Mayr,et al.  Biological Classification: Toward a Synthesis of Opposing Methodologies , 1981, Science.

[26]  Robert C. Dunnell,et al.  Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy , 1978, American Antiquity.

[27]  J. A. Ford.  Ceramic decoration sequence at an old Indian village site near Sicily Island, Louisiana , 1975 .

[28]  F. R. Hodson,et al.  Mathematics and computers in archaeology , 1975 .

[29]  W. Strong.  From History to Prehistory in The Northern Great Plains , 1972 .

[30]  W. Wedel.  Cultural Sequence in the Central Great Plains , 1972 .

[31]  James A. Ford.  A quantitative method for deriving cultural chronology , 1972 .

[32]  W. G. Haag.  Archaeological Survey in the Lower Yazoo Basin, Mississippi, 1949-1955. Philip Phillips. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge, Mass., 1970. In 2 parts. xxviii, 1000 pp., illus. Paper, $30. Papers of the Peabody Museum, vol. 60 , 1972 .

[33]  P. W. Phillips.  American Prehistory. (Book Reviews: Archaeological Survey in the Lower Yazoo Basin, Mississippi, 1949-1955) , 1971 .

[34]  H. Kunkel.  GENERAL INTRODUCTION , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  Robert C. Dunnell,et al.  Systematics in Prehistory , 1971 .

[36]  James N. Hill.  Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social Organization in the American Southwest , 1971 .

[37]  David L. Hull,et al.  Contemporary Systematic Philosophies , 1970 .

[38]  J. Sabloff,et al.  The Importance of Both Analytic and Taxonomic Classification in the Type-Variety System , 1969, American Antiquity.

[39]  W. A. Longacre.  Changing Patterns of Social Integration: A Prehistoric Example from the American Southwest1 , 1966 .

[40]  Michael P. Hoffman,et al.  The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics , 1965 .

[41]  Ĭ. Rouse.  From Prehistory in Haiti, A Study in Method , 1964 .

[42]  H. Ross.  Principles of Numerical Taxonomy , 1964 .

[43]  G. Cowgill.  A Quantitative Method for Deriving Cultural Chronology. James A. Ford , 1963 .

[44]  R. Ascher.  Review of 'A Quantitative Method for Deriving Cultural Chronology' , 1963, American Antiquity.

[45]  Robert E. Smith,et al.  The Type-Variety Concept as a Basis for the Analysis of Maya Pottery , 1960, American Antiquity.

[46]  James C. Gifford.  The Type-Variety Method of Ceramic Classification as an Indicator of Cultural Phenomena , 1960, American Antiquity.

[47]  Irving Rouse,et al.  The Classification of Artifacts in Archaeology , 1960, American Antiquity.

[48]  P. Phillips.  Application of the Wheat-Gifford-Wasley Taxonomy to Eastern Ceramics , 1958, American Antiquity.

[49]  G. Willey,et al.  Method and theory in American archaeology , 1958 .

[50]  James C. Gifford,et al.  Ceramic Variety, Type Cluster, and Ceramic System in Southwestern Pottery Analysis , 1958, American Antiquity.

[51]  P. Phillips.  American Archaeology and General Anthropological Theory , 1955, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology.

[52]  James A. Ford.  Comment on A. C. Spaulding, “Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types” , 1954, American Antiquity.

[53]  A. Spaulding.  Reply to Ford , 1954, American Antiquity.

[54]  James A. Ford.  Spaulding's Review of Ford I , 1954 .

[55]  G. Willey,et al.  Method and Theory in American Archeology: An Operational Basis for Culture-Historical Integration , 1953 .

[56]  A. Spaulding.  Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types , 1953, American Antiquity.

[57]  James Alfred . Ford,et al.  Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the Southeastern States. Anthropological papers of the AMNH ; v. 44, pt. 3 , 2013 .

[58]  J. B. Griffin.  Essays on Archaeological Methods , 1952 .

[59]  George W. Brainerd.  The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis , 1951, American Antiquity.

[60]  A. Krieger.  The Typological Concept , 1944, American Antiquity.

[61]  J. Steward.  The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology , 1942, American Antiquity.

[62]  W. C. Mckern.  The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an Aid to Archaeological Culture Study , 1939, American Antiquity.

[63]  W. Wedel.  The direct-historical approach in pawnee archeology , 1938 .

[64]  J. A. Ford.  Analysis of Indian village site collections from Louisiana and Mississippi , 1936 .

[65]  R. Whitley,et al.  Methods in Social Science. , 1931 .

[66]  C. Abbot,et al.  Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections , 1924, Nature.

[67]  N. Nelson.  The Archaeology of the Southwest: A Preliminary Report. , 1919, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  A. Kidder,et al.  Notes on the Pottery of Pecos , 1917 .

[69]  A. Kidder.  A Design-Sequence from New Mexico. , 1917, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  L. Spier,et al.  An outline for a chronology of Zuñi ruins. Anthropological papers of the AMNH ; v. 18, pt. 3. , 2022 .

[71]  L. Spier.  From An Outline for a Chronology of Zuñi Ruins , 1917 .

[72]  N. Nelson.  Chronology of the Tano Ruins, New Mexico , 1916 .

[73]  C. Wissler.  THE APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL METHODS TO THE DATA ON THE TRENTON ARGILLITE CULTURE1 , 1916 .

[74]  A. Kidder.  Archaeological Explorations at Pecos, New Mexico. , 1916, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  John Griffith.  Putnam Anniversary Volume , 1912, Nature.