Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands

The present study focuses on how candidates in the Dutch general elections of 2010 use Twitter, a popular microblogging and social networking service. Specifically the study focuses on explaining why some candidates are more likely to adopt Twitter, have larger networks, and show more reciprocation than other candidates. The innovation hypothesis, predicting that candidates from less established and smaller parties will use Twitter more extensively, is unsupported. This suggests that normalization of campaign practices is present on Twitter, not changing existing communication practices. The findings do show that being an early adopter of these new technologies is more effective than adoption shortly before Election Day.

[1]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Party Competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain , 1999 .

[2]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning , 2001 .

[3]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  From the air to the ground: the internet in the 2004 US presidential campaign , 2008, New Media Soc..

[4]  Samuel Greengard.  The first internet president , 2009, CACM.

[5]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[6]  Michele Zappavigna,et al.  Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter , 2011, New Media Soc..

[7]  H. Keman.  Experts and manifestos: Different sources - same results for comparative research? , 2007 .

[8]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  Personality profiles and political parties , 1999 .

[9]  K. Foot,et al.  The Internet and national elections : a comparative study of web campaigning , 2007 .

[10]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2003 .

[12]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  PARTIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE—A REVIEW ARTICLE , 2009 .

[13]  Han Woo Park,et al.  e-Research applications for tracking online socio-political capital in the Asia-Pacific region , 2011 .

[14]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  A Hyperlink Network Analysis of Citizen Blogs in South Korean Politics , 2008 .

[15]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, election campaigning, and the internet , 2008 .

[16]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[17]  Peter Chen,et al.  Adoption and Use of Digital Media in Election Campaigns: Australia, Canada and New Zealand Compared , 2010 .

[18]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[20]  P. Norris.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[21]  J. Hilbe.  Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[22]  G. Caprara,et al.  Personality Foundations of Ideological Divide: A Comparison of Women Members of Parliament and Women Voters in Italy , 2010 .

[23]  Chien-leng Hsu,et al.  Sociology of Hyperlink Networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A Case Study of South Korea , 2011 .

[24]  D. Rae,et al.  A Note on the Fractionalization of Some European Party Systems , 1968 .

[25]  P. Norris.  Preaching to the Converted? , 2001 .

[26]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[27]  D. Farrell.  Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction , 2001 .

[28]  W. Bennett,et al.  Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests , 2011 .

[29]  Anne West,et al.  ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook , 2009, New Media Soc..

[30]  Pippa Norris,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2000 .

[31]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain , 2009 .

[32]  Michael Cornfield.  Politics Moves Online: Campaigning and the Internet , 2004 .

[33]  Ran Wei,et al.  Staying connected while on the move , 2006, New Media Soc..

[34]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 , 2008, First Monday.

[35]  A. Chadwick.  Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[36]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning? , 2008 .

[37]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Levels of Interactivity in the 2007 French Presidential Candidates’ Websites , 2010 .

[38]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[39]  N. Copsey.  Extremism on the Net: The extreme right and the value of the internet , 2003 .

[40]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[41]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[42]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis , 2013, New Media Soc..

[43]  M. Pujazon-Zazik,et al.  To Tweet, or Not to Tweet: Gender Differences and Potential Positive and Negative Health Outcomes of Adolescents’ Social Internet Use , 2010, American journal of men's health.

[44]  C. Williams,et al.  Closing the Gap, Raising the Bar , 2007 .

[45]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[46]  André Krouwel,et al.  A double-edged sword! The Dutch centre-right and the ‘foreigners issue’ , 2008 .

[47]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public , 2011 .

[48]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Tentative steps towards interaction: The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament Election 2009 , 2010, Internet Res..

[49]  Lisa J. Orchard,et al.  Current Perspectives on Personality and Internet Use , 2010 .

[50]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Gulati elections of 2006 and 2008 Social networks in political campaigns : Facebook and the congressional , 2013 .

[51]  Joseph M. Hilbe,et al.  Comprar Negative Binomial Regression | Joseph M. Hilbe | 9780521857727 | Cambridge University Press , 2007 .

[52]  Mark Gray,et al.  Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997 , 2000 .

[53]  P. Chen,et al.  Adoption and use of digital media in election campaigns: Australia, Canada and New Zealand , 2010 .

[54]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  One Europe, Many Electorates? , 2007 .

[55]  Nick Anstead,et al.  The Internet and Campaign Finance in the U.S. and the UK: An Institutional Comparison , 2008 .