How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs

A common teaching strategy in the language classroom is to assign students to work on a task in pairs or small groups. Research on group/pair has shown that such classroom organization promotes speaking practice and negotiations of meaning. However, most of the studies on pair work to date have focused on factors affecting the quantity of certain types of negotiation moves. Very few studies have investigated the nature of group or pair interactions; that is, whether they are collaborative or not. Moreover, very few studies have utilized tasks which require students to produce a written text in pairs. The study reported in this paper investigated the performance of three pairs of adult ESL students on a writing task assigned in class. The main source of data was transcripts of the pair talk. Other sources of data included the researcher’s observation notes and the written text the pairs produced. Data were analysed for salient features of student interactions and characteristics of collaborative pair work were identified. Results show that students working in pairs may not necessarily work in a collaborative manner, but where they do collaborate this may have an effect on task performance.

[1]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[2]  Michael H. Long,et al.  Group Work, Interlanguage Talk,and Second Language Acquisition. , 1985 .

[3]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Using Computer-based Text Analysis to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Collaborative Learning , 1997 .

[4]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .

[5]  Evelyn Jacob,et al.  Cooperative Learning: Context and Opportunities for Acquiring Academic English , 1996 .

[6]  Bertram C. Bruce Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[7]  Merril Swain,et al.  Collaborative dialogue: its contribution to second language learning , 1997 .

[8]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Non-native/Non-native Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning , 1985 .

[9]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences , 1990 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning and achievement. , 1990 .

[11]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .

[12]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[13]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .

[14]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[15]  M. Swain,et al.  Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness1 , 1994 .

[16]  T. Pica,et al.  Comprehensible Output as an Outcome of Linguistic Demands on the Learner , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Michael H. Long Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1 , 1983 .

[18]  Frank B. Brooks,et al.  Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks , 1994 .

[19]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[20]  John M. Murphy,et al.  Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts? , 1993 .