A process-oriented life-cycle assessment (LCA) model for environmental and resource-related technologies (EASETECH)

Purpose In life-cycle assessment (LCA), environmental technologies are often modelled as “black-box processes”, where inputs and outputs are typically not linked through physical and/or (bio) chemical relationships. This limits transparency and usability of environmental modelling of resource systems for which the conversion of materials and chemical substances in the materials is essential for the environmental performance. We introduce an advanced “process-oriented” modelling framework allowing quantitative and parameterised physical-chemical relationships between input material composition, conversion process units and subsequent output products, promoting mass and substance balanced conversion modelling and environmental assessment. Methods A dedicated LCA model, EASETECH, has been used to provide a user-friendly platform for performing advanced LCA of complex technologies, without the need for additional software/tools. In the modelling framework, the technology is subdivided into individual unit processes. In each process, the characterisation of the input feedstock material into biochemical, physical, chemical and nutritional properties is taken into consideration in each multi-output production flow. For each unit process, the processes governing the mass/energy/substance transition and transformation are described by mathematical equations (i.e. relationships between inputs and outputs) through the use of parameters. A range of new operators were developed to establish these relationships that allow for non-linear responses whereby changes in one flow can give a non-linear response in other flows. The modelling framework and the involved operators are explained and applied to a biorefinery case study. Results and discussion The model facilitates “tracking” of the feedstock material properties from the input to the final products, by establishing mass, substance and energy balances for each conversion unit process. In addition, the process-oriented modelling framework appropriately represents material/substance transition and transformations. The choice of process parameters has considerable importance for the overall results. This was illustrated by one-at-a-time changes in parameter values in two different biorefinery unit processes (i.e. hydrolysis, and fermentation and distillation). In addition, the relevance of feedstock characteristics for the performance of the individual unit processes was proved with fixed parameter sets with different feedstocks. The biorefinery case study demonstrated that the LCA model can be applied to technology cases with different process configurations (e.g. different efficiencies) and different input feedstock properties, where it automatically adjusts to these changes in properties. Conclusions The advanced process-oriented modelling framework offers more flexible modelling of the conversion technology than previously available, improved options for technology development in view of environmental performance, and potentially more accurate results. This provides a significantly improved basis for environmental modelling and decision-making in relation to resource systems.

[1]  Michael Bortz,et al.  Process Modeling, Simulation and Optimization: From Single Solutions to a Multitude of Solutions to Support Decision Making , 2018, Chemie Ingenieur Technik.

[2]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of producing willow, alfalfa and straw from spring barley as feedstocks for bioenergy or biorefinery systems. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Anders Damgaard,et al.  Linking Data Choices and Context Specificity in Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Treatment Technologies: A Landfill Case Study , 2018 .

[4]  Bahram Zarrin,et al.  Design of a Domain-Specific Language for Material Flow Analysis Using Microsoft DSL Tools: An Experience Paper , 2014 .

[5]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Environmental optimization of biomass use for energy under alternative future energy scenarios for Switzerland , 2018, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[6]  A. Bernstad Saraiva System boundary setting in life cycle assessment of biorefineries: a review , 2016, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[7]  P. Serra,et al.  Coupling sorghum biomass and wheat straw to minimise the environmental impact of bioenergy production , 2017 .

[8]  P. Brunner,et al.  Material Flow Analysis as a Decision Support Tool for Waste Management: A Literature Review , 2015 .

[9]  Abdelmajid Benamara,et al.  Proposition of Eco-Feature: A New CAD/PLM Data Model for an LCA Tool , 2017 .

[10]  Arlindo Silva,et al.  Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection , 2014 .

[11]  D. Tonini,et al.  Environmental implications of the use of agro‐industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land‐use changes , 2016 .

[12]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions. , 2010, Waste management.

[13]  Patrick Reumerman,et al.  Assessment of the sustainability guidelines of EU Renewable Energy Directive: the case of biorefineries , 2015 .

[14]  Merlin Alvarado-Morales,et al.  GHG emission factors for bioelectricity, biomethane, and bioethanol quantified for 24 biomass substrates with consequential life-cycle assessment. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Debora Fino,et al.  Life cycle assessment of orange peel waste management , 2017 .

[16]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[17]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[18]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Minimization of the LCA impact of thermodynamic cycles using a combined simulation-optimization approach , 2012 .

[19]  Anders Damgaard,et al.  An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  Марина Володимирівна Рудіна,et al.  Переклад англомовного варіанту міжнародного документу “Directive 2009/28/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy renewable sources” українською мовою як навчальний ресурс літньої практики студентів-перекладачів , 2018 .

[21]  Michihisa Koyama,et al.  A scenario analysis of future energy systems based on an energy flow model represented as functionals of technology options , 2014 .

[22]  M. Pons,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Naphtha Catalytic Reforming , 2010 .

[23]  P. Brunner,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Combined material flow analysis and life cycle assessment as a support tool for solid waste management decision making , 2016 .

[25]  Caroline Sablayrolles,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the process industry: a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  L. Mancini,et al.  Resource footprint of Europe: Complementarity of material flow analysis and life cycle assessment for policy support , 2015 .

[27]  T. Astrup,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Management: Are We Addressing the Key Challenges Ahead of Us? , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[28]  Qiao-Li Wang,et al.  Life cycle assessment on biogas production from straw and its sensitivity analysis. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[29]  A. Zabaniotou Redesigning a bioenergy sector in EU in the transition to circular waste-based Bioeconomy-A multidisciplinary review , 2018 .

[30]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Challenges for Model-Based Life Cycle Inventories and Impact Assessment in Early to Basic Process Design Stages , 2016 .

[31]  Pratham Arora,et al.  Multi-level Modelling of Sustainable Chemical Production: from CFD to LCA , 2016 .

[32]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Importance of waste composition for Life Cycle Assessment of waste management solutions , 2017 .

[33]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[34]  Wolf Marc-Andree,et al.  European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment: Supporting Life Cycle Thinking in Policy and Industry , 2006 .

[35]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[36]  Charlotte Scheutz,et al.  Long-Term Emission Factors for Land Application of Treated Organic Municipal Waste , 2015, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[37]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[38]  Ali Abbas,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Environments for Sustainable Low-Carbon Energy Production – A Review , 2016 .