Selective Attention and Target Search with Brief Visual Displays

In a series of four experiments, subjects were presented with eight item arrays tachistoscopically. In two tasks, the subject was required to recall a digit presented among seven letters or a letter among seven digits. The remaining tasks required the subject to detect the presence of a specific letter either in the context of seven random letters or seven digits. An examination of the effects of a masking stimulus for various target positions suggested that subjects could attend selectively when the target was a different category than its context but had to process the entire array when the target was the same category as the context. The effects of selective attention and masking are explained in terms of parallel and sequential identification processes.

[1]  R. Gregory Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1966 .

[2]  B. Butler,et al.  The limits of selective attention in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1974, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  P. Merikle,et al.  Selective Masking and Processing Strategy , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J Brand,et al.  Classification without Identification in Visual Search , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  W. Estes,et al.  Visual detection in relation to display size and redundancy of critical elements I , 1966 .

[6]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Selective attention and serial processing in briefly presented visual displays , 1971 .

[7]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[8]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .

[9]  J. Brown Evidence for a selective process during perception of tachistoscopically presented stimuli. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  P. Merikle,et al.  On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  M. Posner On the Relationship between Letter Names and Superordinate Categories , 1970 .

[12]  Processing Order in Visual Perception , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  K. W.,et al.  Visual Detection in Relation to Display Size and Redundancy of Critical Elements L , .

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[15]  Dick Ao,et al.  On the problem of selection in short-term visual (iconic) memory. , 1971 .

[16]  William K. Estes,et al.  Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing , 1972 .

[17]  L Henderson,et al.  Are the ends of tachistoscopic arrays processed first? , 1973, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  William K. Estes,et al.  Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of response in forced-choice visual signal detection , 1966 .

[19]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. , 1970 .

[20]  On the problem of selection in short-term visual (iconic) memory. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Factors affecting processing mode in visual search , 1973 .

[22]  P. Merikle,et al.  Selective forward masking. , 1972, Canadian journal of psychology.