Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long‐term population declines of common birds in Denmark

Aim Long-term monitoring of biodiversity is necessary to identify population declines and to develop conservation management. Because long-term monitoring is labour-intensive, resources to implement robust monitoring programmes are lacking in many countries. The increasing availability of citizen science data in online public databases can potentially fill gaps in structured monitoring programmes, but only if trends estimated from unstructured citizen science data match those estimated from structured monitoring programmes. We therefore aimed to assess the correlation between trends estimated from structured and unstructured data. Location Denmark. Methods We compared population trends for 103 bird species estimated over 28 years from a structured monitoring programme and from unstructured citizen science data to assess whether trends estimated from the two data sources were correlated. Results Trends estimated from the two data sources were generally positively correlated, but less than half the population declines identified from the structured monitoring data were recovered from the unstructured citizen science data. The mismatch persisted when we reduced the structured monitoring data from count data to occurrence data to mimic the information content of unstructured citizen science data and when we filtered the unstructured data to reduce the number of incomplete lists reported. Mismatching trends were especially prevalent for the most common species. Worryingly, more than half the species showing significant declines in the structured monitoring showed significant positive trends in the citizen science data. Main conclusions We caution that unstructured citizen science databases cannot replace structured monitoring data because the former are less sensitive to population changes. Thus, unstructured data may not fulfil one of the most critical functions of structured monitoring programmes, namely to act as an early warning system that detects population declines.

[1]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Site-occupancy models may offer new opportunities for dragonfly monitoring based on daily species lists , 2010 .

[2]  M. Kéry,et al.  A resampling-based method for effort correction in abundance trend analyses from opportunistic biological records , 2014 .

[3]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[4]  J. Clobert,et al.  Advantages of Volunteer‐Based Biodiversity Monitoring in Europe , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  G. Tucker,et al.  Habitats for birds in Europe : a conservation strategy for the wider environment , 1997 .

[6]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data , 2010, PLoS biology.

[7]  Ayesha I. T. Tulloch,et al.  A behavioural ecology approach to understand volunteer surveying for citizen science datasets , 2012 .

[8]  Stephen R. Baillie,et al.  Evaluating the Breeding Bird Survey for producing national population size and density estimates , 2005 .

[9]  K. Hornik,et al.  party : A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning , 2009 .

[10]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Rhys E. Green,et al.  Using simple species lists to monitor trends in animal populations: new methods and a comparison with independent data , 2007 .

[12]  Arco J. van Strien,et al.  Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models , 2013 .

[13]  Michael Schaub,et al.  Bayesian Population Analysis using WinBUGS: A Hierarchical Perspective , 2011 .

[14]  R. Gregory,et al.  2 Bird census and survey techniques , 2004 .

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass-participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme , 2012 .

[16]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[17]  K. Gaston,et al.  Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[18]  D. Roy,et al.  Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds , 2012 .

[19]  J. Krebs,et al.  Agriculture: Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions , 2002, Nature.

[20]  Göran Ericsson,et al.  Monitoring rare or elusive large mammals using effort-corrected voluntary observers , 2009 .

[21]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research , 2015 .

[22]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of crowd-sourced and professionally collected field data used in species distribution models of Taiwanese moths , 2015 .

[23]  WESLEY M. HOCHACHKA,et al.  Data-Mining Discovery of Pattern and Process in Ecological Systems , 2007 .

[24]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Trend estimation in populations with imperfect detection , 2009 .

[25]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Regional avian species declines estimated from volunteer-collected long-term data using List Length Analysis. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs , 2013 .

[27]  D. Franklin.  Evidence of disarray amongst granivorous bird assemblages in the savannas of northern Australia, a region of sparse human settlement , 1999 .

[28]  Anne-Laure Boulesteix,et al.  Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics , 2012, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[29]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[30]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[31]  Ian J. Burfield,et al.  Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds , 2006 .

[32]  Richard D. Gregory,et al.  Bird census and survey techniques , 2004 .

[33]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science , 2014 .

[34]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  Bias and information in biological records , 2015 .

[35]  T. Snäll,et al.  Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring , 2011 .

[36]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  M. Pal,et al.  Random forests for land cover classification , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[38]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[39]  D. W. Snow,et al.  The birds of the Western Palearctic. concise edition , 1997 .

[40]  Catriona A. Morrison,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in population trends in a long‐distance migratory bird , 2010 .

[41]  David B. Roy,et al.  Statistics for citizen science: extracting signals of change from noisy ecological data , 2014 .

[42]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[43]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  H. Possingham,et al.  To boldly go where no volunteer has gone before: predicting volunteer activity to prioritize surveys at the landscape scale , 2013 .

[45]  J. Summers-Smith,et al.  The status of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus in north-western Europe: a review , 2007, Journal of Ornithology.

[46]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Site‐Occupancy Distribution Modeling to Correct Population‐Trend Estimates Derived from Opportunistic Observations , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[47]  Dirk S. Schmeller,et al.  Bird-monitoring in Europe – a first overview of practices, motivations and aims , 2012 .

[48]  M. Kéry,et al.  Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site‐occupancy models , 2010 .

[49]  Jeremy J D Greenwood,et al.  The monitoring of British breeding birds: a success story for conservation science? , 2003, The Science of the total environment.