Location differences in communities’ preferences for environmental improvements in selected NSW catchments: A Choice Modelling approach

To elicit household willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in environmental quality in three NSW catchments (Lachlan, Namoi and Hawkesbury-Nepean), a choice modelling (CM) study was conducted.This report presents results of research designed to investigate variations in WTP across different communities. The communities included local residents, distant/urban and distant/rural residents. Nine split samples were established to test for ‘location effects’. The analysis involved both conditional logit and random-parameters logit models. Natural resource management (NRM), including Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs), can use the non-market values obtained from this study to guide their investment decisions. Key words: Choice modelling, location effects, non-market valuation, catchment planning, environment

[1]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[2]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , 2000 .

[4]  I. Bateman,et al.  Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1997 .

[5]  D. Hensher,et al.  Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport , 2000 .

[6]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP , 2006 .

[7]  S. Stouffer.  Intervening opportunities: a theory relating mobility and distance , 1940 .

[8]  J. Bennett,et al.  Testing for Framing Effects in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2000 .

[9]  J. Bennett,et al.  Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes , 2004 .

[10]  Mark Morrison,et al.  Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer , 2006 .

[11]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality , 1985 .

[12]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Implementing the Convolutions Approach: A Companion to "Measuring the Difference (X-Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach" , 1994 .

[13]  G. Cheng,et al.  Choice modeling and its application to managing the Ejina Region, China , 2007 .

[14]  Xuehong Wang,et al.  Estimating Non-Market Environmental Benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: a choice modeling approach , 2007 .

[15]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Relaxing the IID assumption – introducing variants of the MNL model , 2000 .

[16]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[17]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Developing a Methodology for Benefit Transfers Using Geographical Information Systems: Modelling Demand for Woodland Recreation , 1999 .

[18]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[19]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation , 2001 .

[20]  J. Bennett,et al.  Some Fundamentals of Environmental Choice Modelling , 2001 .

[21]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment , 2005 .

[22]  J. Loomis,et al.  The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California , 1997 .

[23]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[24]  S. Swallow,et al.  Context-Sensitive Benefit Transfer Using Stated Choice Models: Specification and Convergent Validity for Policy Analysis , 2005 .

[25]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  J. Loomis.  How large is the extent of the market for public goods: evidence from a nationwide contingent valuation survey , 1996 .

[27]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer , 2004 .

[28]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland , 2008 .

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2002 .

[30]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[31]  G. Concu,et al.  Investigating Distance Effects on Environmental Values: A Choice Modelling Approach , 2007 .

[32]  K. McConnell,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources , 2002 .

[33]  Martin J. Beckmann.  Lectures on location theory , 1999 .

[34]  John Rolfe,et al.  Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values , 2006 .

[35]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[36]  John Rolfe,et al.  Designing the choice modelling survey instrument for establishing riparian buffers in the Fitzroy Basin (Establishing the Potential for Offset Trading in the Lower Fitzroy River Research Report No. 3) , 2004 .

[37]  J. Bennett,et al.  Willingness to pay for wetland improvement in Vietnam's Mekong River Delta , 2007 .

[38]  M. Espey,et al.  Neighborhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville, South Carolina , 2001, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[39]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[40]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Economics of outdoor recreation , 1967 .

[41]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies , 2000 .

[42]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .