Bricolage in a hybrid digital lutherie context: a workshop study

Interaction design research typically differentiates processes involving hardware and software tools as being led by tinkering and play, versus engineering and conceptualisation. Increasingly however, embedded maker tools and platforms require hybridisation of these processes. In the domain of digital musical instrument (DMI) design, we were motivated to explore the tensions of such a hybrid process. We designed a workshop where groups of DMI designers were given the same partly-finished instrument consisting of four microphones exciting four vibrating string models. Their task was to refine this simple instrument to their liking for one hour using Pure Data software. All groups sought to use the microphone signals to control the instrument's behaviour in rich and complex ways, but found even apparently simple mappings difficult to realise within the time constraint. We describe the difficulties they encountered and discuss emergent issues with tinkering in and with software. We conclude with further questions and suggestions for designers and technologists regarding embedded DMI design processes and tools.

[1]  S. Puig Digital lutherie - crafting musical computers for new musics' performance and improvisation , 2005 .

[2]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Liveness and Flow in Notation Use , 2012, NIME.

[3]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing for Exploratory Play with a Hackable Digital Musical Instrument , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Kevin Karplus,et al.  Digital Synthesis of Plucked-String and Drum Timbers , 1983 .

[5]  Vasiliki Tsaknaki,et al.  Articulating Challenges of Hybrid Crafting for the Case of Interactive Silversmith Practice , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[6]  Jack Armitage,et al.  Building an IDE for an embedded system using web technologies , 2017 .

[7]  Christopher Alex McLean,et al.  Artist-programmers and programming languages for the arts , 2011 .

[8]  S Puckette Miller,et al.  Pure Data : another integrated computer music environment , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew McPherson,et al.  Crafting Digital Musical Instruments: An Exploratory Workshop Study , 2018, NIME.

[10]  Fabio Morreale,et al.  NIMEcraft Workshop: Exploring the Subtleties of Digital Lutherie , 2017 .

[11]  Kenneth E. Iverson,et al.  Notation as a tool of thought , 1980, APLQ.

[12]  Tony Stockman,et al.  Rich gesture, reduced control: the influence of constrained mappings on performance technique , 2017, MOCO.

[13]  Sarah-Indriyati Hardjowirogo Instrumentality. On the Construction of Instrumental Identity , 2017 .

[14]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Hybrid crafting: towards an integrated practice of crafting with physical and digital components , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project , 2011 .

[16]  F. Thomas,et al.  The illusion of life : Disney animation , 1981 .

[17]  Andrew P. McPherson,et al.  Do We Speak Sensor? Cultural Constraints of Embodied Interaction , 2018, NIME.

[18]  G Moro,et al.  Making High-Performance Embedded Instruments with Bela and Pure Data , 2016 .

[19]  C. Lévi-Strauss The Savage Mind , 1967 .

[20]  Anna Vallgårda,et al.  Interaction Design as a Bricolage Practice , 2015, TEI.

[21]  Andrew P. McPherson,et al.  Making Up Instruments: Design Fiction for Value Discovery in Communities of Musical Practice , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[22]  Steven L. Tanimoto,et al.  A perspective on the evolution of live programming , 2013, 2013 1st International Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE).