Visual marking: using time in visual selection

[1]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  History Matters , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex—an event-related fMRI study of visual marking , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Aging and visual marking: selective deficits for moving stimuli. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[7]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking and visual change. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Covert Reorienting and Inhibition of Return: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition , 2002 .

[12]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  A. Yagi,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual Marking of Locations and Feature Maps: Evidence from Within-dimension Defined Conjunctions , 1999 .

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Janice J. Snyder,et al.  Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .

[23]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  S. Yantis,et al.  Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[25]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color , 1994 .

[28]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[32]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[35]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[38]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[39]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Orienting of Attention Orienting of Attention* , 2022 .

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  M. Chun,et al.  Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  B. Gibson,et al.  Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  D G Watson,et al.  Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  P. Atchley,et al.  Age-related effects in the marking of old objects in visual search. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[46]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking of old objects , 1998 .

[47]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[48]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[50]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[51]  U. Neisser.  Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[52]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .