Changes in juice quality and sugarcane yield with recurrent selection for sucrose.

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) breeding programs in Louisiana have made improving sucrose con- tent a top priority because a short growing season limits cane yield. Using a recurrent selection strategy, the cultivars with the highest sucrose content are crossed, and a new generation of cultivars is selected from the progeny. This study was designed to determine how selection primarily for sucrose content has modified physiological characters, and impacted sucrose content and yield. Five cultivars were randomly selected from each of seven generations of recurrent selection in Louisiana and planted in two experi- ments. The plant and first stubble crops were harvested late in the harvest season from each experiment. Cane yield and juice quality were determined. Cultivars from the last three generations were superior to cultivars from the first three generations for Brix % cane, sucrose % cane, purity, theoretically recoverable sugar (TRS), cane yield and sugar yield. Fiber % cane was not different among the generations. Selection primarily for sucrose has increased Brix % cane from 14% to 16%, sucrose % cane from 12% to 14%, purity from 82.5% to 87.3%, and TRS from 98 to 122 kg Mg−1. A plateau in juice quality and sucrose yield in the last three generations may indicate that: (1) Louisiana's short growing season may restrict sucrose accumulation; (2) the genetic potential for late season juice quality has been reached with currently available germplasm; or (3) the inclusion of lower juice quality Saccharum spontaneum germplasm into the breeding program in order to increase disease tolerance, cold tolerance, and ratooning ability has diluted the effect of recurrent selection for sucrose. Published by Elsevier B.V.

[1]  D. Hogarth Genetics of Sugarcane , 1987 .

[2]  J. Glaszmann,et al.  Molecular investigation of the genetic base of sugarcane cultivars , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[3]  R. D. Breaux Breeding to enhance sucrose content of sugarcane varieties in Louisiana , 1984 .

[4]  Barry Glaz,et al.  Genetic contribution to yield gains in the Florida sugarcane industry across 33 years , 2005 .

[5]  S. C. Liu,et al.  QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane. , 2001, Genome research.

[6]  A. Paterson,et al.  Construction of a Saccharum Consensus Genetic Map from Two Interspecific Crosses , 2002 .

[7]  F. A. Martin,et al.  Registration of ‘L 97‐128’ Sugarcane , 2008 .

[8]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  GROWTH OF SUGARCANE UNDER HIGH INPUT CONDITIONS IN TROPICAL AUSTRALIA. II.SUCROSE ACCUMULATION AND COMMERCIAL YIELD , 1996 .

[9]  A. Paterson,et al.  Construction of a Consensus Genetic Map from Two Interspecific Crosses , 2002 .

[10]  Ryan P. Viator,et al.  Recurrent selection for sucrose content has altered growth and sugar accumulation in sugarcane , 2009 .

[11]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Selection of Sugarcane Clones in Small Plots: Effects of Plot Size and Selection Criteria , 2001 .

[12]  Edward P. Richard,et al.  Sugarcane Yield, Sugarcane Quality, and Soil Variability in Louisiana , 2005 .

[13]  C. Deren Genetic base of U.S. Mainland sugarcane , 1995 .

[14]  R. Littell SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[15]  P. Jackson,et al.  Quantitative trait loci identified for sugar related traits in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar × Saccharum officinarum population , 2006, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[16]  X. Draye,et al.  Molecular dissection of complex traits in autopolyploids: mapping QTLs affecting sugar yield and related traits in sugarcane , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[17]  C. Kimbeng,et al.  Identification of molecular markers associated with sugar-related traits in a Saccharum interspecific cross , 2009, Euphytica.

[18]  S. Chapman,et al.  Lodging reduces sucrose accumulation of sugarcane in the wet and dry tropics , 2002 .

[19]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Dry matter partitioning of sugarcane in Australia and South Africa , 2002 .

[20]  F. A. Martin,et al.  Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits , 1990 .

[21]  D. J. Heinz,et al.  Sugarcane improvement through breeding , 1987 .

[22]  K. Gravois,et al.  Early Stage Sugarcane Selection Using Different Plot Sizes , 2007 .

[23]  P. Besse,et al.  Characterisation of genome regions incorporated from an important wild relative into Australian sugarcane , 2005, Molecular Breeding.

[24]  B. Legendre,et al.  Registration of ‘HoCP 00‐950’ Sugarcane , 2009 .

[25]  J. K. Stringer,et al.  Benchmarking genetic gains from new cultivars in Queensland using productivity data. , 2007 .