The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information

Individuals prefer to receive information that is consistent with their attitudes. Three experiments examined whether attitude strength moderates this selective exposure effect. Experiments 1A and 1B found that participants preferred attitudinally consistent information but that this effect was more pronounced to the extent that the attitude was strongly held. Experiment 2 replicated these findings and ruled out an alternative interpretation that a general tendency to hold strong attitudes rather than issue-specific attitude strength moderates selective exposure. Discussion concerns the implications of these findings and the possibility that other variables moderate the selective exposure effect.

[1]  Aaron Lowin,et al.  Further evidence for an approach-avoidance interpretation of selective exposure , 1969 .

[2]  D. Frey,et al.  The Influence of Mood on the Search for Supporting Versus Conflicting Information: Dissonance Reduction as a Means of Mood Regulation? , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Connecting Terror Management and Dissonance Theory: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases the Preference for Supporting Information after Decisions , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude strength and resistance processes. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[6]  L. Festinger Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[7]  A Lowin,et al.  Approach and avoidance: alternate modes of selective exposure to information. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Dieter Frey,et al.  A clarification of selective exposure: The impact of choice , 1978 .

[9]  John L. Cotton,et al.  Selective exposure to information and cognitive dissonance , 1980 .

[10]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  Biased Information Search in the Interpersonal Domain , 1989 .

[11]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. , 1984 .

[12]  T. Brock,et al.  Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[14]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Reversible and Irreversible Decisions , 1981 .

[15]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength: An overview. , 1995 .

[17]  Lucy Johnston,et al.  Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. , 1996 .

[18]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Information Seeking after Decisions , 1984 .

[20]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[21]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[23]  Dolores Albarracín,et al.  The Role of Defensive Confidence in Preference for Proattitudinal Information: How Believing That One Is Strong Can Sometimes Be a Defensive Weakness , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. , 1995 .

[25]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? , 1993 .

[26]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .