Promoting behaviour change through personalized energy feedback in offices

A body of research suggests that the provision of energy feedback information to building users can elicit significant energy reductions through behaviour change. However, most studies have focused on energy use in homes and the assessment of interventions and technologies, to the neglect of the non-domestic context and broader issues arising from the introduction of feedback technologies. To address this gap, a non-domestic case study explores the delivery of personalized energy feedback to office workers through a novel system utilizing wireless technologies. The research demonstrates advantages of monitoring occupancy and quantifying energy use from specific behaviours as a basis for effective energy feedback; this is particularly important where there are highly disaggregated forms of energy use and a range of locations for that activity to take place. Quantitative and qualitative data show that personalized feedback can help individuals identify energy reduction opportunities. However, the analysis also highlights important contextual barriers and issues that need to be addressed when utilizing feedback technologies in the workplace. If neglected, these issues may limit the effective take-up of feedback interventions.

[1]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[2]  A. Carrico,et al.  Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education , 2011 .

[3]  F. Siero,et al.  Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback , 1996 .

[4]  William J Buchanan,et al.  Radio frequency identification (RFID) in pervasive healthcare , 2009 .

[5]  S. S. van Dam,et al.  Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term , 2010 .

[6]  Gj Raw,et al.  Energy Demand Research Project: final analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Security and Privacy Challenges in the Smart Grid , 2009, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[8]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Modification of Driving Behavior in a Large Transport Organization: A Field Experiment , 1989 .

[9]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Exploring the Social Dynamics of Proenvironmental Behavior Change , 2009 .

[10]  Mark Gillott,et al.  Domestic energy and occupancy: a novel post-occupancy evaluation study , 2010 .

[11]  Nan Li,et al.  Measuring and monitoring occupancy with an RFID based system for demand-driven HVAC operations , 2012 .

[12]  Rui Zhang,et al.  An information technology enabled sustainability test-bed (ITEST) for occupancy detection through an environmental sensing network , 2010 .

[13]  M. Newborough,et al.  Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes : Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays , 2007 .

[14]  David Lehrer,et al.  Visualizing information to improve building performance: a study of expert users , 2010 .

[15]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation , 2010, NordiCHI.

[16]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Carbon reduction in existing buildings: a transdisciplinary approach , 2010 .

[17]  Lauri Sydanheimo,et al.  Kilavi platform for wireless building automation , 2008 .

[18]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Space Use in a Dwelling Using RFID Tracking , 2006 .

[19]  O. T. Masoso,et al.  The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use , 2010 .

[20]  David Lehrer Research scoping report: visualizing information in commercial buildings , 2009 .

[21]  David Lehrer,et al.  Evaluating a social media application for sustainability in the workplace , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[23]  S. Karjalainen Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption , 2011 .

[24]  Neil Brown,et al.  Novel instrumentation for monitoring after-hours electricity consumption of electrical equipment, and some potential savings from a switch-off campaign. , 2012 .

[25]  Christoph Sorge,et al.  Do not snoop my habits: preserving privacy in the smart grid , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Katherine N. Irvine,et al.  Evaluating Personalised Energy Feedback Information for Behaviour Change in Commercial Buildings , 2012 .

[27]  Mark Gillott,et al.  Low-carbon housing design informed by research , 2010 .

[28]  Torin Monahan,et al.  Tracking the social dimensions of RFID systems in hospitals , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications , 2012 .

[30]  Robert W. Marans,et al.  The human dimension of energy conservation and sustainability: A case study of the University of Michigan's energy conservation program , 2010 .

[31]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  After-hours power status of office equipment in the USA , 2005 .

[32]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  Buildings don't use energy: people do , 2011 .

[33]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Energy feedback in buildings: improving the infrastructure for demand reduction , 2008 .

[34]  Neil Brown,et al.  Information, communication and entertainment appliance use—Insights from a UK household study , 2012 .

[35]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[36]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Metering: EU policy and implications for fuel poor households , 2012 .