Conceptualising Reduction, Emergence and Self-Organisation in Complex Dynamical Systems

Publisher Summary This chapter describes the application of reduction concepts in emergence and self organization of complex dynamical system. Condition-dependent laws compress and dynamical equation sets provide implicit compressed representations even when most of that information is not explicitly available without decompression. And, paradoxically, there is still the determined march of fundamental analytical dynamics expanding its compression reach toward a Theory of Everything—even while the more rapidly expanding domain of complex systems dynamics confronts its assumptions and its monolithicity. Nor does science fall apart into a disunified aggregate of particular cases since, with fundamental dynamics as a backbone, complex matching up of models across theoretical and empirical domains then articulates its model-structured skeleton. Discussion provides the delicately entwined dance of emergence and reduction providing constraints on compression that also permit its expansion. However, while the vision is not dead, it is currently substantially more complexly structured through model similarities and differences than that initially envisaged and individuals are left with deep questions about compression unresolved.

[1]  C. Hooker,et al.  Applying Self-Directed Anticipative Learning to Science II: Learning How to Learn Across a Revolution in Early Ape Language Research , 2007, Perspectives on Science.

[2]  C. A. Hooker,et al.  Projection, Physical Intelligibility, Objectivity and Completeness: The Divergent Ideals of Bohr and Einstein , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Lindley Darden,et al.  Discovering Complexity , 1996 .

[4]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[5]  J. Collier,et al.  The Dynamical Basis of Emergence in Natural Hierarchies , 1998 .

[6]  K. Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  Metabolism and the problem of its universalization. , 1999, Bio Systems.

[7]  Ron Dare,et al.  The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science , 1997 .

[8]  M. Polanyi Life's irreducible structure. Live mechanisms and information in DNA are boundary conditions with a sequence of boundaries above them. , 1968, Science.

[9]  John Collier,et al.  A Dynamical Account of Emergence , 2008, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[10]  Hans V. Westerhoff,et al.  Emergence and Its Place in Nature: A Case Study of Biochemical Networks , 2005, Synthese.

[11]  C. Hooker,et al.  Reduction as cognitive strategy , 2005 .

[12]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  A systemic approach to the origin of biological organization , 2007 .

[13]  J. Barham Debating Design: The Emergence of Biological Value , 2004 .

[14]  C. A. Hooker,et al.  Asymptotics, Reduction and Emergence , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[15]  J. Hooker In This Volume , 2012 .

[16]  Alex J. Ryan,et al.  Emergence is coupled to scope, not level , 2006, Complex..

[17]  M. R. Flannery,et al.  The enigma of nonholonomic constraints , 2005 .

[18]  C. Hooker Introduction to Philosophy of Complex Systems , 2011 .

[19]  K. Lynch Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Jaegwon Kim Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation , 2001 .

[21]  J. Collier,et al.  Supervenience and Reduction in Biological Hierarchies , 1988 .

[22]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Complexity and Organization , 1972 .

[23]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems , 1999 .

[24]  C. Hooker From Phenomena to Metaphysics , 1994 .

[25]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Error, Error-Statistics and Self-Directed Anticipative Learning , 2009 .

[26]  Anthony M. Bloch,et al.  Equivalence of the dynamics of nonholonomic and variational nonholonomic systems for certain initial data , 2008 .

[27]  E. M. Dewan,et al.  Consciousness as an Emergent Causal Agent in the Context of Control System Theory , 1976 .

[28]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  The devil in the details : asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence , 2002 .

[29]  C. A. Hooker,et al.  Applying Self-Directed Anticipative Learning to Science I: Agency, Error, and the Interactive Exploration of Possibility Space in Early Ape-Language Research. , 2007, Perspectives on Science.

[30]  W. Bechtel,et al.  Explanation: a mechanist alternative. , 2005, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[31]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Complex systems and networks: Challenges and opportunities for chemical and biological engineers , 2004 .

[32]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[33]  James W. McAllister,et al.  Algorithmic randomness in empirical data , 2003 .

[34]  J. Butterfield On Hamilton-Jacobi Theory as a Classical Root of Quantum Theory , 2005 .

[35]  P. Churchland Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind , 1980 .

[36]  Hans V. Westerhoff,et al.  BioComplexity: A pluralist research strategy is necessary for a mechanistic explanation of the "live" state , 2002 .

[37]  Ausonio Marras Kim On Reduction , 2002 .

[38]  N. Goldenfeld,et al.  Coarse-graining of cellular automata, emergence, and the predictability of complex systems. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Applying self-directed anticipative learning to Science II: learning how to learn across 'Revolutions' , 2007 .

[40]  I. Prigogine Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Principles in the Evolutionary Design of Digital Circuits—Part II , 2000, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.