Archaeal phylogeny: reexamination of the phylogenetic position of Archaeoglobus fulgidus in light of certain composition-induced artifacts.

A major and too little recognized source of artifact in phylogenetic analysis of molecular sequence data is compositional difference among sequences. The problem becomes particularly acute when alignments contain ribosomal RNAs from both mesophilic and thermophilic species. Among prokaryotes the latter are considerably higher in G + C content than the former, which often results in artificial clustering of thermophilic lineages and their being placed artificially deep in phylogenetic trees. In this communication we review archaeal phylogeny in the light of this consideration, focusing in particular on the phylogenetic position of the sulfate reducing species Archaeoglobus fulgidus, using both 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA sequences. The analysis shows clearly that the previously reported deep branching of the A. fulgidus lineage (very near the base of the euryarchaeal side of the archaeal tree) is incorrect, and that the lineage actually groups with a previously recognized unit that comprises the Methanomicrobiales and extreme halophiles.

[1]  J. Marmur.  A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms , 1961 .

[2]  G. Olsen,et al.  Archaebacterial phylogeny: perspectives on the urkingdoms. , 1986, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[3]  C. Woese,et al.  The phylogeny of archaebacteria , 1985 .

[4]  N. Pace,et al.  Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Brown,et al.  Genes encoding the 7S RNA and tRNA(Ser) are linked to one of the two rRNA operons in the genome of the extremely thermophilic archaebacterium Methanothermus fervidus. , 1990, Gene.

[6]  O. Kandler,et al.  Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  C. Woese,et al.  Methanopyrus kandleri: an archaeal methanogen unrelated to all other known methanogens. , 1991, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[8]  G. Olsen,et al.  Earliest phylogenetic branchings: comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. , 1987, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[9]  W. Whitman,et al.  Methanogens and the diversity of archaebacteria. , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[10]  T. Jukes.  CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[11]  C. Woese,et al.  Rooting the archaebacterial tree: the pivotal role of Thermococcus celer in archaebacterial evolution. , 1988, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[12]  C. Woese,et al.  The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. , 1989, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[13]  A. Böck,et al.  Genes for stable RNA in the extreme thermophile Thermoproteus tenax: introns and transcription signals , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[14]  A. Böck,et al.  The Phylogenetic Position of the Sulfur-Dependent Archaebacterium Thermoproteus tenax: Sequence of the 16S rRNA Gene , 1985 .

[15]  G. Hong,et al.  Buffer gradient gels and 35S label as an aid to rapid DNA sequence determination. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  H. Noller,et al.  Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  A. Böck,et al.  Sequence of the 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene from Methanococcus vannielii: Evolutionary Implications , 1985 .

[18]  C. Woese,et al.  A possible biochemical missing link among archaebacteria , 1987, Nature.

[19]  B. Kaine,et al.  Genes for the 16S and 5S Ribosomal RNAs and the 7S RNA of Pyrodictium occultum , 1989 .

[20]  H. Noller,et al.  Complete nucleotide sequence of a 23S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C. Woese,et al.  Were the original eubacteria thermophiles? , 1987, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[22]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  C. Woese,et al.  Sequence of the 16S Ribosomal RNA from Halobacterium volcanii, an Archaebacterium , 1983, Science.

[24]  R. Gutell,et al.  Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[25]  J. Messing.  [2] New M13 vectors for cloning , 1983 .

[26]  J. Felsenstein.  Numerical Methods for Inferring Evolutionary Trees , 1982, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[27]  A. Böck,et al.  The Nucleotide Sequence of the 16S rRNA Gene and Flanking Regions from Methanobacterium formicicum: The Phylogenetic Relationship between Methanogenic and Halophilic Archaebacteria , 1985 .

[28]  G. Soete.  A least squares algorithm for fitting additive trees to proximity data , 1983 .

[29]  R. Garrett,et al.  Evolutionary relationships amongst archaebacteria. A comparative study of 23 S ribosomal RNAs of a sulphur-dependent extreme thermophile, an extreme halophile and a thermophilic methanogen. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  J. Felsenstein.  Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[31]  F. Kramer,et al.  Structure-independent nucleotide sequence analysis. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  C R Woese,et al.  Higher order structural elements in ribosomal RNAs: pseudo-knots and the use of noncanonical pairs. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. V. Van Etten,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas: basis for their classification , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.