Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits.

Older adults show a characteristic pattern of impaired and spared functioning relative to younger adults. Elsewhere we have argued that many age-related changes in cognitive function are rooted in an impaired ability to inhibit irrelevant information and inappropriate responses. In this chapter we review evidence that as a direct result of impaired inhibitory processes, older adults tend to be highly susceptible to distraction. We suggest that because the distinction between relevant and irrelevant is seldom either clear or static, distractibility can manifest as either a cost or a benefit depending on the situation. We review evidence that in situations in which it interferes with the current task, distraction is disproportionately detrimental to older adults compared to university aged adults, but that when previously distracting information becomes relevant, older adults show a benefit whereas younger adults do not.

[1]  R. West,et al.  In defense of the frontal lobe hypothesis of cognitive aging , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[2]  K. Oberauer Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[4]  Agatha Lenartowicz,et al.  Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[5]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[6]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[7]  Laura L. Carstensen,et al.  When I'm 64 , 2006 .

[8]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The Attraction Effect in Decision Making: Superior Performance by Older Adults , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Pamela K. Smith,et al.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[11]  L. Hasher,et al.  Aging and a benefit of distractibility , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Aging, circadian arousal patterns, and cognition. , 1999 .

[13]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[14]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Distraction as a determinant of processing speed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults' Decision Making , 2007, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  Robert A. Koeppe,et al.  Age Differences in Behavior and PET Activation Reveal Differences in Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Cheryl L Grady,et al.  Changes in memory processing with age , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Older adults’ associative deficit in episodic memory: Assessing the role of decline in attentional resources , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. , 1991 .

[21]  D. C. Bradford,et al.  Age-related decrements in Stroop Color Test performance. , 1984, Journal of clinical psychology.

[22]  S. Connelly,et al.  Age and reading: the impact of distraction. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[23]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[25]  P. Verhaeghen Aging and vocabulary scores: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[26]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Synchrony effects in cognition: The costs and a benefit , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The associative memory deficit of older adults: further support using face-name associations. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[29]  R. West,et al.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  F. Royer,et al.  Normative data for the Symbol Digit Substitution Task. , 1981, Journal of clinical psychology.

[31]  Mara Mather,et al.  A Review of Decision-Making Processes: Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Aging , 2006 .

[32]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The role of interference in memory span , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[33]  C. Lustig,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .

[34]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Latent Inhibition and Openness to Experience in a high-achieving student population , 2000 .

[35]  L Hasher,et al.  Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  L. Hasher,et al.  Framing effects in younger and older adults. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.