Horizontal thermal contraction of oceanic lithosphere: The ultimate limit to the rigid plate approximation

There is a contradiction between two widely accepted pillars of global tectonics, (1) the central plate tectonic assumption of plate rigidity and (2) the explanation of the relief of the seafloor as being due to lithospheric subsidence from thermal contraction. Here we quantify the rate of predictable horizontal thermal contraction of the lithosphere using depth averages of widely accepted thermal models. Depth‐averaged cooling rate, and thus depth‐averaged contraction rate, is proportional to t−1, where t is the age of the lithosphere. Depth‐averaged thermal contraction rate of old (i.e., 167 Ma old) lithosphere is 10−5 Ma−1 (3 × 10−19 s−1), which is an order of magnitude greater than the average strain rate inferred from seismic moment release. Newly created (i.e., 0.1 Ma old) lithosphere is displaced by thermal contraction toward lithosphere in old ocean basins at a rate that is 1.35% of the half rate of seafloor spreading, giving displacement rates of 0.1 to 1.1 km Ma−1 (or, equivalently, 0.1 to 1.1 mm a−1). Predicted displacement rates parallel to midocean ridges depend strongly on lithospheric age and are proportional to the distance along which contractional strain rates are integrated. Displacement rates can be significant (≥1 km Ma−1) for young lithosphere. In particular the displacement of oceanic lithosphere adjacent to southern Baja California relative to lithosphere near the Pacific‐Antarctic Rise has an indicated north‐south displacement rate between ≈3 and ≈10 km Ma−1. This suggests that global plate motion circuits based on the assumption of plate rigidity may be biased by a substantial velocity.

[1]  T. Dixon,et al.  New constraints on relative motion between the Pacific Plate and Baja California microplate (Mexico) from GPS measurements , 2007 .

[2]  J. Royer,et al.  Motion of Nubia relative to Antarctica since 11 Ma: Implications for Nubia-Somalia, Pacific–North America, and India-Eurasia motion , 2006 .

[3]  Douglas S. Wilson,et al.  Implications of volcanism in coastal California for the Neogene deformation history of western North America , 2005 .

[4]  K. Priestley,et al.  Thermal structure of oceanic and continental lithosphere , 2005 .

[5]  Adrian Lenardic,et al.  The role of chemical boundary layers in regulating the thickness of continental and oceanic thermal boundary layers , 2005 .

[6]  J. Hillier,et al.  Relationship between depth and age in the North Pacific Ocean , 2005 .

[7]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Warping and cracking of the Pacific plate by thermal contraction , 2004 .

[8]  K. Macdonald,et al.  Pacific Plate gravity lineaments: Diffuse extension or thermal contraction? , 2003 .

[9]  J. Stock,et al.  Pacific-North America Plate Tectonics of the Neogene Southwestern United States: An Update , 1998 .

[10]  R. Gordon.  THE PLATE TECTONIC APPROXIMATION: Plate Nonrigidity, Diffuse Plate Boundaries, and Global Plate Reconstructions , 1998 .

[11]  R. Dietmar Müller,et al.  Digital isochrons of the world's ocean floor , 1997 .

[12]  D. Argus,et al.  Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry , 1996 .

[13]  P. Richet,et al.  Thermal expansion of forsterite up to the melting point , 1996 .

[14]  P. Molnar,et al.  Lithospheric folding in the Indian Ocean and the rheology of the oceanic plate , 1995 .

[15]  B. Evans,et al.  Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments , 1995 .

[16]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[17]  P. Wessel.  Thermal stresses and the bimodal distribution of elastic thickness estimates of the oceanic lithosphere , 1992 .

[18]  S. Stein,et al.  A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age , 1992, Nature.

[19]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[20]  E. Parmentier,et al.  Thermal contraction and the state of stress in the oceanic lithosphere , 1988 .

[21]  E. Parmentier,et al.  Thermal stresses in the oceanic lithosphere: Evidence from geoid anomalies at fracture zones , 1986 .

[22]  D. Sandwell.  Thermal stress and the spacings of transform faults , 1986 .

[23]  S. Solomon,et al.  Thermoelastic stress: How important as a cause of earthquakes in young oceanic lithosphere? , 1985 .

[24]  S. Stein,et al.  Intraplate seismicity and stresses in young oceanic lithosphere , 1984 .

[25]  S. Solomon,et al.  Source mechanisms of earthquakes near mid-ocean ridges from body waveform inversion - Implications for the early evolution of oceanic lithosphere , 1984 .

[26]  K. Macdonald.  Mid-Ocean Ridges: Fine Scale Tectonic, Volcanic and Hydrothermal Processes Within the Plate Boundary Zone , 1982 .

[27]  B. Parsons,et al.  An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age , 1977 .

[28]  B. J. Collette.  Thermal contraction joints in a spreading seafloor as origin of fracture zones , 1974, Nature.

[29]  W. J. Morgan,et al.  Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks , 1968 .

[30]  D. McKenzie.  Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies , 1967 .

[31]  D. McKenzie,et al.  The North Pacific: an Example of Tectonics on a Sphere , 1967, Nature.

[32]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Finite amplitude convective cells and continental drift , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  J. Wilson,et al.  A New Class of Faults and their Bearing on Continental Drift , 1965, Nature.