Overview of the DEMO staged design approach in Europe

This paper describes the status of the pre-conceptual design activities in Europe to advance the technical basis of the design of a DEMOnstration Fusion Power Plant (DEMO) to come in operation around the middle of this century with the main aims of demonstrating the production of few hundred MWs of net electricity, the feasibility of operation with a closed-tritium fuel cycle, and maintenance systems capable of achieving adequate plant availability. This is expected to benefit as much as possible from the ITER experience, in terms of design, licensing, and construction. Emphasis is on an integrated design approach, based on system engineering, which provides a clear path for urgent R&D and addresses the main design integration issues by taking account critical systems interdependencies and inherent uncertainties of important design assumptions (physics and technology). A design readiness evaluation, together with a technology maturation and down selection strategy are planned through structured and transparent Gate Reviews. By embedding industry experience in the design from the beginning it will ensure that early attention is given to technology readiness and industrial feasibility, costs, maintenance, power conversion, nuclear safety and licensing aspects.

[1]  T. Lunt,et al.  Assessment of alternative divertor configurations as an exhaust solution for DEMO , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[2]  Antony Loving,et al.  Issues of the vertical blanket segment architecture in DEMO: Current progress and resolution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[3]  B. Heinemann,et al.  A conceptual system design study for an NBI beamline for the European DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[4]  G. Caruso,et al.  Thermal-hydraulic modeling and analyses of the water-cooled EU DEMO using RELAP5 system code , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[5]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Hybrid HTS-Nb3Sn-NbTi DEMO CS coil design optimized for maximum magnetic flux generation , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[6]  Alessandro Bruschi,et al.  Initial port integration concept for EC and NB systems in EU DEMO tokamak , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[7]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Critical design issues in DEMO and solution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[8]  S. Ciattaglia,et al.  EU DEMO safety and balance of plant design and operating requirements. Issues and possible solutions , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[9]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[10]  R. Zanino,et al.  Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[11]  Roberto Ambrosino,et al.  Evaluation of feasibility and costs of alternative magnetic divertor configurations for DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[12]  A. Tarallo,et al.  Progress in the design development of EU DEMO helium-cooled pebble bed primary heat transfer system , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[13]  Andrea Tarallo,et al.  Preliminary CAD implementation of EU-DEMO primary heat transfer systems for HCPB breeding blanket option , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[14]  Elena Gaio,et al.  The reactive power demand in DEMO: Estimations and study of mitigation via a novel design approach for base converters , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[15]  Danilo Nicola Dongiovanni,et al.  An enhanced, near-term HCPB design as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[16]  J. Morris,et al.  Figure of merit for divertor protection in the preliminary design of the EU-DEMO reactor , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[17]  R. Heidinger,et al.  The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: the IFMIF-DONES project , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[18]  John Jelonnek,et al.  Overview of recent gyrotron R&D towards DEMO within EUROfusion Work Package Heating and Current Drive , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[19]  I. Ricapito,et al.  An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[20]  A. della Corte,et al.  DC Test Results of the DEMO TF React&Wind Conductor Prototype No. 2 , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[21]  W. Hering,et al.  Status of EU DEMO heat transport and power conversion systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[22]  Angel Ibarra,et al.  DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[23]  G. Federici,et al.  Preliminary design of EU DEMO helium-cooled breeding blanket primary heat transfer system , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[24]  A. Tarallo,et al.  Study of EU DEMO WCLL breeding blanket and primary heat transfer system integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[25]  John Jelonnek,et al.  EU DEMO EC system preliminary conceptual design , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[26]  Yves Poitevin,et al.  ITER TBM Program and associated system engineering , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[27]  P. Sardain,et al.  DEMO design using the SYCOMORE system code: Influence of technological constraints on the reactor performances , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[28]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Tritium breeding performance of a DEMO based on the Double Null divertor configuration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[29]  A. Tincani,et al.  Tritium technologies and transport modelling: main outcomes from the European TBM Project , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[30]  W. Arter,et al.  Wall protection strategies for DEMO plasma transients , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[31]  G. Federici,et al.  Progress in EU Breeding Blanket design and integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[32]  R. Ambrosino,et al.  Exploring a broad spectrum of design options for DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[33]  Sergio Ciattaglia,et al.  Initial layout of DEMO buildings and configuration of the main plant systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[34]  Y. Sakamoto,et al.  Plasma exhaust and divertor studies in Japan and Europe broader approach, DEMO design activity , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[35]  B. Heinemann,et al.  Technology developments for a beam source of an NNBI system for DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[36]  M. E. Biancolini,et al.  Progress in the design of the superconducting magnets for the EU DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[37]  T. Franke,et al.  EMC3-EIRENE modeling of edge plasma to improve the ICRF coupling with local gas puffing in DEMO , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[38]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  DEMO Central Solenoid Design Based on the Use of HTS Sections at Highest Magnetic Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[39]  A. della Corte,et al.  A Prototype Conductor by React&WIND Method for the EUROfusion DEMO TF Coils , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[40]  W. Fietz,et al.  Critical Current Densities of 482 A/mm2 in HTS CrossConductors at 4.2 K and 12 T , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[41]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Systems engineering perspective to the integration of the heating and current drive system in the EU DEMO: Analysis of requirements and functions , 2017, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[42]  Yves Poitevin,et al.  The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: EUROFER97 material and TBM’s fabrication technologies development and qualification , 2017 .

[43]  G. Federici,et al.  Uncertainties in power plant design point evaluations , 2017 .

[44]  B. J. Peters,et al.  Analysis of low pressure hydrogen separation from fusion exhaust gases by the means of superpermeability , 2017 .

[45]  John Jelonnek,et al.  Conceptual design of the EU DEMO EC-system: main developments and R&D achievements , 2017 .

[46]  Qingwei Yang,et al.  Overview of the present progress and activities on the CFETR , 2017 .

[47]  Mark R. Gilbert,et al.  European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials , 2017 .

[48]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Design and R&D for the DEMO Toroidal Field Coils Based on Nb3Sn React and Wind Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[49]  Alessandro Lampasi,et al.  The European DEMO fusion reactor: Design status and challenges from balance of plant point of view , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe).

[50]  L. Zani,et al.  EU-DEMO TF and CS Magnet Systems Design and Analyses Performed at CEA , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[51]  A. della Corte,et al.  Design, Manufacture, and Test of an 80 kA-Class Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductor With Rectangular Geometry and Distributed Pressure Relief Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[52]  P. Vincenzi,et al.  Conceptual design of the DEMO neutral beam injectors: main developments and R&D achievements , 2017 .

[53]  V. Parail,et al.  Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER , 2017, 1701.05507.

[54]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[55]  Christian Bachmann,et al.  Neutronic analyses of design issues affecting the tritium breeding performance in different DEMO blanket concepts , 2016 .

[56]  R. Ambrosino,et al.  Limitations of transient power loads on DEMO and analysis of mitigation techniques , 2016 .

[57]  N. Bekris,et al.  Advanced design of the mechanical Tritium pumping system for JET DTE2 , 2016 .

[58]  Mikko Siuko,et al.  Overview of progress on the European DEMO remote maintenance strategy , 2016 .

[59]  T. Sketchley,et al.  MHD PbLi experiments in MaPLE loop at UCLA , 2016 .

[60]  R Pasqualotto,et al.  A feasibility study of a NBI photoneutralizer based on nonlinear gating laser recirculation. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[61]  J. Morris,et al.  "PROCESS": a systems code for fusion power plants - Part 2:Engineering , 2016, 1601.06147.

[62]  P. Garibaldi,et al.  R&D around a photoneutralizer-based NBI system (Siphore) in view of a DEMO Tokamak steady state fusion reactor , 2015, 1911.12210.

[63]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Test of 60 kA coated conductor cable prototypes for fusion magnets , 2015 .

[64]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Advances in the physics basis for the European DEMO design , 2015 .

[65]  David Ward,et al.  “PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics , 2014 .

[66]  M. Gadomska,et al.  Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities , 2014 .

[67]  T. Giegerich,et al.  The KALPUREX-Process - A new vacuum pumping process for exhaust gases in fusion power plants , 2014 .

[68]  P. F. Morris,et al.  Developing structural, high-heat flux and plasma facing materials for a near-term DEMO fusion power plant: The EU assessment , 2014, 1408.3546.

[69]  T. Giegerich,et al.  The direct internal recycling concept to simplify the fuel cycle of a fusion power plant , 2013 .

[70]  B. Wan,et al.  Study on H-mode access at low density with lower hybrid current drive and lithium-wall coatings on the EAST superconducting tokamak , 2011 .

[71]  A. Loarte,et al.  Assessment of erosion of the ITER divertor targets during type I ELMs , 2003 .

[72]  J. Vetter Breeding blanket development for NET , 1989 .

[73]  W. Daenner,et al.  Blanket testing in NET , 1989 .

[74]  F. Wagner,et al.  Regime of Improved Confinement and High Beta in Neutral-Beam-Heated Divertor Discharges of the ASDEX Tokamak , 1982 .

[75]  An enhanced near-term HCPB configuration as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019 .

[76]  O. Sauter,et al.  Development of a Plasma Scenario for the EU-DEMO: Current Activities and Perspectives , 2018 .

[77]  Kai Nordlund,et al.  European Research Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy , 2018 .

[78]  Fabio Giannetti,et al.  EU DEMO Heat Transport and Power Conversion System design: options and status , 2018 .

[79]  Muyuan Li,et al.  Sweeping heat flux loads on divertor targets: Thermal benefits and structural impacts , 2016 .

[80]  P. Vincenzi,et al.  The physics and technology basis entering European system code studies for DEMO , 2016 .

[81]  P. Barabaschi,et al.  Fusion electricity: a roadmap to the realization of fusion energy , 2012 .