Overview of the DEMO staged design approach in Europe
暂无分享,去创建一个
Gerald Pintsuk | Antony Loving | E. Diegele | J.-H. You | C. Bachmann | Elena Gaio | Sergio Ciattaglia | Wolfgang Biel | Valentina Corato | Minh Quang Tran | Lorenzo V. Boccaccini | C. Vorpahl | G. Federici | B. Meszaros | M. Siccinio | I. Moscato | L. Barucca | Christian Day | T. Franke | H. Walden | Angel Ibarra | C. Baylard | F. Cismondi | C. Gliss | C. Bustreo | R. Kembleton | N. Taylor | G. Keech | F. Maviglia | T. Franke | E. Gaio | G. Pintsuk | J. You | F. Cismondi | W. Biel | B. Mészáros | J. Morris | G. Federici | L. Boccaccini | E. Diegele | C. Bachmann | C. Vorpahl | V. Corato | R. Kembleton | C. Gliss | S. Ciattaglia | F. Maviglia | N. Taylor | J. Morris | C. Bustreo | M. Siccinio | A. Loving | T. Haertl | Joanne M. Holden | C. Baylard | T. Haertl | H. Walden | L. Barucca | J. Holden | G. Keech | I. Moscato | L. Boccaccini | M. Tran | A. Ibarra | C. Day | Wolfgang Biel | A. Ibarra | Minh Quang Tran | V. Corato | C. Day | Th. Franke
[1] T. Lunt,et al. Assessment of alternative divertor configurations as an exhaust solution for DEMO , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.
[2] Antony Loving,et al. Issues of the vertical blanket segment architecture in DEMO: Current progress and resolution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[3] B. Heinemann,et al. A conceptual system design study for an NBI beamline for the European DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[4] G. Caruso,et al. Thermal-hydraulic modeling and analyses of the water-cooled EU DEMO using RELAP5 system code , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[5] P. Bruzzone,et al. Hybrid HTS-Nb3Sn-NbTi DEMO CS coil design optimized for maximum magnetic flux generation , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[6] Alessandro Bruschi,et al. Initial port integration concept for EC and NB systems in EU DEMO tokamak , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[7] F. Maviglia,et al. Critical design issues in DEMO and solution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[8] S. Ciattaglia,et al. EU DEMO safety and balance of plant design and operating requirements. Issues and possible solutions , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[9] F. Maviglia,et al. Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[10] R. Zanino,et al. Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[11] Roberto Ambrosino,et al. Evaluation of feasibility and costs of alternative magnetic divertor configurations for DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[12] A. Tarallo,et al. Progress in the design development of EU DEMO helium-cooled pebble bed primary heat transfer system , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[13] Andrea Tarallo,et al. Preliminary CAD implementation of EU-DEMO primary heat transfer systems for HCPB breeding blanket option , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[14] Elena Gaio,et al. The reactive power demand in DEMO: Estimations and study of mitigation via a novel design approach for base converters , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[15] Danilo Nicola Dongiovanni,et al. An enhanced, near-term HCPB design as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[16] J. Morris,et al. Figure of merit for divertor protection in the preliminary design of the EU-DEMO reactor , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.
[17] R. Heidinger,et al. The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: the IFMIF-DONES project , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.
[18] John Jelonnek,et al. Overview of recent gyrotron R&D towards DEMO within EUROfusion Work Package Heating and Current Drive , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.
[19] I. Ricapito,et al. An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[20] A. della Corte,et al. DC Test Results of the DEMO TF React&Wind Conductor Prototype No. 2 , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[21] W. Hering,et al. Status of EU DEMO heat transport and power conversion systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[22] Angel Ibarra,et al. DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[23] G. Federici,et al. Preliminary design of EU DEMO helium-cooled breeding blanket primary heat transfer system , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[24] A. Tarallo,et al. Study of EU DEMO WCLL breeding blanket and primary heat transfer system integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[25] John Jelonnek,et al. EU DEMO EC system preliminary conceptual design , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[26] Yves Poitevin,et al. ITER TBM Program and associated system engineering , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[27] P. Sardain,et al. DEMO design using the SYCOMORE system code: Influence of technological constraints on the reactor performances , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[28] F. Maviglia,et al. Tritium breeding performance of a DEMO based on the Double Null divertor configuration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[29] A. Tincani,et al. Tritium technologies and transport modelling: main outcomes from the European TBM Project , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[30] W. Arter,et al. Wall protection strategies for DEMO plasma transients , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[31] G. Federici,et al. Progress in EU Breeding Blanket design and integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[32] R. Ambrosino,et al. Exploring a broad spectrum of design options for DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[33] Sergio Ciattaglia,et al. Initial layout of DEMO buildings and configuration of the main plant systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[34] Y. Sakamoto,et al. Plasma exhaust and divertor studies in Japan and Europe broader approach, DEMO design activity , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[35] B. Heinemann,et al. Technology developments for a beam source of an NNBI system for DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[36] M. E. Biancolini,et al. Progress in the design of the superconducting magnets for the EU DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[37] T. Franke,et al. EMC3-EIRENE modeling of edge plasma to improve the ICRF coupling with local gas puffing in DEMO , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.
[38] P. Bruzzone,et al. DEMO Central Solenoid Design Based on the Use of HTS Sections at Highest Magnetic Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[39] A. della Corte,et al. A Prototype Conductor by React&WIND Method for the EUROfusion DEMO TF Coils , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[40] W. Fietz,et al. Critical Current Densities of 482 A/mm2 in HTS CrossConductors at 4.2 K and 12 T , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[41] Thomas Franke,et al. Systems engineering perspective to the integration of the heating and current drive system in the EU DEMO: Analysis of requirements and functions , 2017, Fusion Engineering and Design.
[42] Yves Poitevin,et al. The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: EUROFER97 material and TBM’s fabrication technologies development and qualification , 2017 .
[43] G. Federici,et al. Uncertainties in power plant design point evaluations , 2017 .
[44] B. J. Peters,et al. Analysis of low pressure hydrogen separation from fusion exhaust gases by the means of superpermeability , 2017 .
[45] John Jelonnek,et al. Conceptual design of the EU DEMO EC-system: main developments and R&D achievements , 2017 .
[46] Qingwei Yang,et al. Overview of the present progress and activities on the CFETR , 2017 .
[47] Mark R. Gilbert,et al. European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials , 2017 .
[48] P. Bruzzone,et al. Design and R&D for the DEMO Toroidal Field Coils Based on Nb3Sn React and Wind Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[49] Alessandro Lampasi,et al. The European DEMO fusion reactor: Design status and challenges from balance of plant point of view , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe).
[50] L. Zani,et al. EU-DEMO TF and CS Magnet Systems Design and Analyses Performed at CEA , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[51] A. della Corte,et al. Design, Manufacture, and Test of an 80 kA-Class Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductor With Rectangular Geometry and Distributed Pressure Relief Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
[52] P. Vincenzi,et al. Conceptual design of the DEMO neutral beam injectors: main developments and R&D achievements , 2017 .
[53] V. Parail,et al. Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER , 2017, 1701.05507.
[54] T. Franke,et al. Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .
[55] Christian Bachmann,et al. Neutronic analyses of design issues affecting the tritium breeding performance in different DEMO blanket concepts , 2016 .
[56] R. Ambrosino,et al. Limitations of transient power loads on DEMO and analysis of mitigation techniques , 2016 .
[57] N. Bekris,et al. Advanced design of the mechanical Tritium pumping system for JET DTE2 , 2016 .
[58] Mikko Siuko,et al. Overview of progress on the European DEMO remote maintenance strategy , 2016 .
[59] T. Sketchley,et al. MHD PbLi experiments in MaPLE loop at UCLA , 2016 .
[60] R Pasqualotto,et al. A feasibility study of a NBI photoneutralizer based on nonlinear gating laser recirculation. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.
[61] J. Morris,et al. "PROCESS": a systems code for fusion power plants - Part 2:Engineering , 2016, 1601.06147.
[62] P. Garibaldi,et al. R&D around a photoneutralizer-based NBI system (Siphore) in view of a DEMO Tokamak steady state fusion reactor , 2015, 1911.12210.
[63] P. Bruzzone,et al. Test of 60 kA coated conductor cable prototypes for fusion magnets , 2015 .
[64] Massimiliano Mattei,et al. Advances in the physics basis for the European DEMO design , 2015 .
[65] David Ward,et al. “PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics , 2014 .
[66] M. Gadomska,et al. Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities , 2014 .
[67] T. Giegerich,et al. The KALPUREX-Process - A new vacuum pumping process for exhaust gases in fusion power plants , 2014 .
[68] P. F. Morris,et al. Developing structural, high-heat flux and plasma facing materials for a near-term DEMO fusion power plant: The EU assessment , 2014, 1408.3546.
[69] T. Giegerich,et al. The direct internal recycling concept to simplify the fuel cycle of a fusion power plant , 2013 .
[70] B. Wan,et al. Study on H-mode access at low density with lower hybrid current drive and lithium-wall coatings on the EAST superconducting tokamak , 2011 .
[71] A. Loarte,et al. Assessment of erosion of the ITER divertor targets during type I ELMs , 2003 .
[72] J. Vetter. Breeding blanket development for NET , 1989 .
[73] W. Daenner,et al. Blanket testing in NET , 1989 .
[74] F. Wagner,et al. Regime of Improved Confinement and High Beta in Neutral-Beam-Heated Divertor Discharges of the ASDEX Tokamak , 1982 .
[75] An enhanced near-term HCPB configuration as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019 .
[76] O. Sauter,et al. Development of a Plasma Scenario for the EU-DEMO: Current Activities and Perspectives , 2018 .
[77] Kai Nordlund,et al. European Research Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy , 2018 .
[78] Fabio Giannetti,et al. EU DEMO Heat Transport and Power Conversion System design: options and status , 2018 .
[79] Muyuan Li,et al. Sweeping heat flux loads on divertor targets: Thermal benefits and structural impacts , 2016 .
[80] P. Vincenzi,et al. The physics and technology basis entering European system code studies for DEMO , 2016 .
[81] P. Barabaschi,et al. Fusion electricity: a roadmap to the realization of fusion energy , 2012 .