Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes

The importance of lotic systems as sinks for nitrogen inputs is well recognized. A fraction of nitrogen in streamflow is removed to the atmosphere via denitrification with the remainder exported in streamflow as nitrogen loads. At the watershed scale, there is a keen interest in understanding the factors that control the fate of nitrogen throughout the stream channel network, with particular attention to the processes that deliver large nitrogen loads to sensitive coastal ecosystems. We use a dynamic stream transport model to assess biogeochemical (nitrate loadings, concentration, temperature) and hydrological (discharge, depth, velocity) effects on reach-scale denitrification and nitrate removal in the river networks of two watersheds having widely differing levels of nitrate enrichment but nearly identical discharges. Stream denitrification is estimated by regression as a nonlinear function of nitrate concentration, streamflow, and temperature, using more than 300 published measurements from a variety of US streams. These relations are used in the stream transport model to characterize nitrate dynamics related to denitrification at a monthly time scale in the stream reaches of the two watersheds. Results indicate that the nitrate removal efficiency of streams, as measured by the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed via denitrification per unit length of channel, is appreciably reduced during months with high discharge and nitrate flux and increases during months of low-discharge and flux. Biogeochemical factors, including land use, nitrate inputs, and stream concentrations, are a major control on reach-scale denitrification, evidenced by the disproportionately lower nitrate removal efficiency in streams of the highly nitrate-enriched watershed as compared with that in similarly sized streams in the less nitrate-enriched watershed. Sensitivity analyses reveal that these important biogeochemical factors and physical hydrological factors contribute nearly equally to seasonal and stream-size related variations in the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed in each watershed.

[1]  David R. Soller,et al.  U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1298 , 2010 .

[2]  B. Rhoads,et al.  Influence of geomorphological variability in channel characteristics on sediment denitrification in agricultural streams. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  Nicholas G. Aumen,et al.  Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems , 1990 .

[4]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Measuring Nutrient Spiralling in Streams , 1981 .

[5]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Dynamics of N removal over annual time periods in a suburban river network , 2008 .

[6]  Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences , 1996 .

[7]  Elizabeth W. Boyer,et al.  Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. , 2002 .

[8]  F. Bormann,et al.  Concepts and Methods for Assessing Solute Dynamics in Stream Ecosystems , 2007 .

[9]  R. Alexander,et al.  The regional and global significance of nitrogen removal in lakes and reservoirs , 2009 .

[10]  J. Böhlke,et al.  Denitrification in nitrate-rich streams: application of N2:Ar and 15N-tracer methods in intact cores. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  M. Doyle,et al.  Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks , 2006 .

[12]  B. Whitton,et al.  Kinetic Parameters of Denitrification in a River Continuum , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  Toward a transport‐based analysis of nutrient spiraling and uptake in streams , 2007 .

[14]  Dennis P. Swaney,et al.  Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences , 1996 .

[15]  Robert M. Summers,et al.  The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An Empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay , 1992 .

[16]  J. Böhlke,et al.  Reach‐scale isotope tracer experiment to quantify denitrification and related processes in a nitrate‐rich stream, midcontinent United States , 2004 .

[17]  John A. Harrison,et al.  Global N removal by freshwater aquatic systems using a spatially distributed, within‐basin approach , 2008 .

[18]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: Denitrification , 2009 .

[19]  M. Álvarez-Cobelas,et al.  Denitrification in Aquatic Environments: A Cross-system Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  Gregory E Schwarz,et al.  Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Harvey E. Jobson,et al.  Prediction of Traveltime and Longitudinal Dispersion in Rivers and Streams , 1996 .

[23]  L. J. Youngdahl.  Differences in phosphorus efficiency in bean genotypes , 1990 .

[24]  M. B. David,et al.  Response of Sediment Denitrification Rates to Environmental Variables in Streams Heavily Impacted by Agriculture , 2007 .

[25]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  Section 3. The SPARROW Surface Water-Quality Model: Theory, Application and User Documentation , 2006 .

[26]  Gregory E Schwarz,et al.  The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality1 , 2007, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[27]  J. Lenters,et al.  Modeling the impact of hydrological changes on nitrate transport in the Mississippi River Basin from 1955 to 1994 , 2002 .

[28]  Nicholas J. Clifford,et al.  Classics in physical geography revisited , 1996 .

[29]  D. J. Graczyk,et al.  Preparation of average annual runoff map of the United States, 1951-80 , 1989 .

[30]  W. Richardson,et al.  Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux , 2004 .

[31]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Modeling denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at regional scales. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: Total uptake , 2009 .

[33]  Mary A. Voytek,et al.  Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA , 2009 .

[34]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[35]  T. Royer,et al.  Transport and fate of nitrate in headwater agricultural streams in Illinois. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[36]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[37]  Wilfred M. Wollheim,et al.  Relationship between river size and nutrient removal , 2006 .

[38]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams , 2001, Science.

[39]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  Stream denitrification and total nitrate uptake rates measured using a field 15N tracer addition approach , 2004 .

[40]  R. Wayne Skaggs,et al.  Nitrogen Removal in Streams of Agricultural Catchments—A Literature Review , 2007 .