Why and Where to Fund Carbon Capture and Storage

This paper puts forward two claims about funding carbon capture and storage. The first claim is that there are moral justifications supporting strategic investment into CO2 storage from global and regional perspectives. One argument draws on the empirical evidence which suggests carbon capture and storage would play a significant role in a portfolio of global solutions to climate change; the other draws on Rawls’ notion of legitimate expectations and Moellendorf’s Anti-Poverty principle. The second claim is that where to pursue this strategic investment poses a morally non-trivial problem, with considerations like near-term global distributive justice and undermining legitimate expectations favouring investing in developing regions, especially in Asia, and considerations like long-term climate impacts and best uses of resources favouring investing in the relatively wealthy regions that have the best prospects for successful storage development.

[1]  H. Shue.  Mitigation gambles: uncertainty, urgency and the last gamble possible , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  M. Roman,et al.  Carbon capture and storage in developing countries: A comparison of Brazil, South Africa and India , 2011 .

[3]  Transforming Industry through CCUS , 2019 .

[4]  C. Preston.  Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal , 2020, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[5]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Negative emissions and international climate goals—learning from and about mitigation scenarios , 2019, Climatic Change.

[6]  Clare Heyward,et al.  Situating and Abandoning Geoengineering: A Typology of Five Responses to Dangerous Climate Change , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[7]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Betting on negative emissions , 2014 .

[8]  H. Buck,et al.  Why Talk about Carbon Removal? , 2018 .

[9]  Why ‘global public good’ is a treacherous term, especially for geoengineering , 2014, Climatic Change.

[10]  Aie.  World Energy Investment 2019 , 2019 .

[11]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Confronting mitigation deterrence in low-carbon scenarios , 2021 .

[12]  D. Moellendorf.  The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy , 2014 .

[13]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Don’t deploy negative emissions technologies without ethical analysis , 2018, Nature.

[14]  Duncan McLaren,et al.  Procedural Justice in Carbon Capture and Storage , 2012 .

[15]  Dominic Lenzi.  The ethics of negative emissions , 2018, Global Sustainability.

[16]  Solomon F. Brown,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward , 2018 .

[17]  D. Moellendorf,et al.  Assessing climate policies: Catastrophe avoidance and the right to sustainable development , 2021 .

[18]  David Reiner,et al.  Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects , 2016, Nature Energy.

[19]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  Time to stop investing in carbon capture and storage and reduce government subsidies of fossil‐fuels , 2014 .

[20]  Heleen de Coninck,et al.  Technical Summary. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways , 2018 .

[21]  Hazel Robertson,et al.  The engineering challenges of CO2 storage , 2018 .

[22]  Climate dreaming: negative emissions, risk transfer, and irreversibility , 2017 .

[23]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  ETHICS, EQUITY AND THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE PAPER 1: SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY , 2014, Economics and Philosophy.

[24]  Jesse D. Jenkins,et al.  The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation , 2018, Joule.

[25]  M. Celia.  Geological storage of captured carbon dioxide as a large‐scale carbon mitigation option , 2017 .

[26]  C. Field,et al.  The global overlap of bioenergy and carbon sequestration potential , 2018, Climatic Change.

[27]  R. Kopp,et al.  Toward ethical norms and institutions for climate engineering research , 2009, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[28]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  ETHICS, EQUITY AND THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE PAPER 2: ECONOMICS AND POLITICS , 2014, Economics and Philosophy.

[29]  Alfonso Martínez Arranz.  Carbon capture and storage: Frames and blind spots , 2015 .

[30]  J. Moreno-Cruz,et al.  Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks , 2019, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[31]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice , 2014 .

[32]  James Meadowcroft,et al.  Caching the Carbon , 2009 .

[33]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals , 2014 .

[34]  Why geoengineering is not a ‘global public good’, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one , 2013, Climatic Change.

[35]  Michael Oppenheimer,et al.  The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage: Framing an emergent technology , 2011 .

[36]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Individual Expectations and Climate Justice , 2011 .

[37]  L. Dilling,et al.  Geoengineering, Ocean Fertilization, and the Problem of Permissible Pollution , 2011, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[38]  J. Meadowcroft.  Exploring negative territory Carbon dioxide removal and climate policy initiatives , 2013, Climatic Change.

[39]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Social Acceptance and Ethical Acceptability , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[40]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[41]  Hauke Riesch,et al.  BEYOND ‘FOR OR AGAINST’: Environmental NGO-evaluations of CCS as a climate change solution , 2012 .

[42]  Dominic Lenzi.  On the Permissibility (Or Otherwise) of Negative Emissions , 2021, Ethics, Policy & Environment.

[43]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[44]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis , 2018 .

[45]  K. Peacock.  As Much as Possible, as Soon As Possible: Getting Negative About Emissions , 2021, Ethics, Policy & Environment.

[46]  G. Peters,et al.  The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.

[47]  Hari M. Osofsky.  Caching the carbon : The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage , 2010 .

[48]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal , 2019, Nature.

[49]  James Meadowcroft,et al.  The Politics and Policy of CCS: The Uncertain Road Ahead , 2009 .

[50]  P. Ringrose.  The CCS hub in Norway: some insights from 22 years of saline aquifer storage , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[51]  S. Shackley,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage — Not a Silver Bullet to Climate Change, but a Feasible Option? , 2012 .

[52]  J. Lane,et al.  Uncertain storage prospects create a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[53]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Assessing the Feasibility of Global Long-Term Mitigation Scenarios , 2017 .

[54]  Calum Brown,et al.  Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[55]  D. Morrow.  Why geoengineering is a public good, even if it is bad , 2014, Climatic Change.