Studying the Grammatical Aspects of Word Recognition: Lexical Priming, Parsing, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

Two experiments are reported examining the relationship between lexical and syntactic processing during language comprehension, combining techniques common to the on-line study of syntactic ambiguity resolution with priming techniques common to the study of lexical processing. By manipulating grammatical properties of lexical primes, we explore how lexically based knowledge is activated and guides combinatory sentence processing. Particularly, we find that nouns (like verbs, see Trueswell & Kim, 1998) can activate detailed lexically specific syntactic information and that these representations guide the resolution of relevant syntactic ambiguities pertaining to verb argument structure. These findings suggest that certain principles of knowledge representation common to theories of lexical knowledge—such as overlapping and distributed representations—also characterize grammatical knowledge. Additionally, observations from an auditory comprehension study suggest similar conclusions about the lexical nature of parsing in spoken language comprehension. They also suggest that thematic role and syntactic preferences are activated during word recognition and that both influence combinatory processing.

[1]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[2]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  On Choosing the Parse with the Scene: The Role of Visual Context and Verb bias in Ambiguity Resolution , 2001 .

[3]  Albert Kim.  The grammatical aspects of word recognition , 2000 .

[4]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[5]  Michael Collins,et al.  Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing , 2000, CL.

[6]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[9]  J. Trueswell,et al.  How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping It in the Bud: Fast Priming of Verb Argument Structure , 1998 .

[10]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[12]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[13]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from unconscious priming , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[15]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological Codes Are Automatically Activated During Reading: Evidence From an Eye Movement Priming Paradigm , 1995 .

[18]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Lexical Expectations in Parsing Complement-Verb Sentences , 1989 .

[20]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[21]  Neal J. Pearlmutter,et al.  Lexical semantics as a basis for argument structure frequency biases , 2002 .

[22]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  A. Treisman.  Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[24]  M Taft,et al.  Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  The Convergence of Lexicalist Perspectives in Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics , 2000 .

[26]  L P Shapiro,et al.  Verb effects during sentence processing. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. , 1985 .

[28]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[29]  Martin Kay,et al.  Regular Models of Phonological Rule Systems , 1994, CL.

[30]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[31]  A R Schmauder,et al.  Argument structure frames: a lexical complexity metric? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[33]  S. Sereno.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  D. G. MacKay.  Aspects of the Theory of Comprehension, Memory and Attention , 1973 .

[35]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[36]  K. Rayner,et al.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Srinivas Bangalore,et al.  Supertagging: An Approach to Almost Parsing , 1999, CL.