Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics

The basic social relations of peasant life are directly related to an environment characterized by extreme scarcity. The major factor of productive wealth in agriculture is land, to which the peasant has little or no free access. Labor—his own, and that of his family members—is available to the peasant, but this relatively unproductive factor must be applied to land in order to generate wealth. Few other outlets for productive labor employment are available to him. When the peasant is able to combine land and labor in a wealth-generating endeavor, his productivity is likely to be extremely low, due to limiting factors such as technology, capital, marketing information, and credit. All of these life aspects combine to hold down the peasant's income and preclude savings. He is, in a word, poor.Furthermore, the peasant is powerless against many threats which abound in his environment. There are disease, accident, and death, among the natural threats. There are violence, exploitation, and injustice at the hands of the powerful, among the human threats. The peasant knows that this environmental constellation is dangerous. He also knows that there is relatively little he can do about his situation, and, accordingly, his culture often features themes of vulnerability, calamity, and misfortune. As George Foster has neatly summarized if, the outlook this situation engenders in the peasant is the “Image of the Limited Good.â€

[1]  S. Tarrow Peasant Communism In Southern Italy , 1967 .

[2]  M. Kenny Patterns of Patronage in Spain , 1960 .

[3]  S. Huntington Political Order in Changing Societies , 1969 .

[4]  M. Beqiraj Peasantry in revolution , 1966 .

[5]  J. Lopreato,et al.  Peasants no more , 1967 .

[6]  Banfield,et al.  MORAL BASIS OF A BACKWARD SOCIETY , 1958 .

[7]  The Organizational Society. , 1979 .

[8]  S. Lipset,et al.  Elites in Latin America , 1968 .

[9]  B. Russett Inequality and Instability: The Relation of Land Tenure to Politics , 1964, World Politics.

[10]  A. Weingrod Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties , 1968, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[11]  A. Stinchcombe Agricultural Enterprise and Rural Class Relations , 1961, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Guenther Roth,et al.  Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire-Building in the New States , 1968, World Politics.

[13]  E. Wolf Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico' , 1956 .

[14]  M. Weiner The politics of scarcity , 1962 .

[15]  J. Pitt-Rivers The People Of The Sierra , 1954 .

[16]  E. Friedl The Role of Kinship in the Transmission of National Culture to Rural Villages in Mainland Greece1 , 1959 .

[17]  C. Landé Leaders, factions, and parties : the structure of Philippine politics , 1966, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[18]  C. Erasmus Upper Limits of Peasantry and Agrarian Reform: Bolivia, Venezuela, and Mexico Compared , 1967 .