Hill coefficients, dose–response curves and allosteric mechanisms

Hill coefficients (nH) derived from four parameter logistic fits to dose–response curves were compared to calculated realistic reaction schemes and related to experimental data: (1) Hill coefficients may give information on the number of interacting sites but cannot distinguish between competitive, non-competitive or ortho-, iso-, or allosteric mechanisms. (2) For enzymatic dose–inhibition curves, Hill coefficients smaller than one do not indicate anticooperative binding but show that at least one ternary complex has enzymatic activity. (3) Hill coefficients different from one are proof for multiple ligand binding. The large variations of reported Hill coefficients corresponds to multiple allosteric binding, where induced conformational changes cause loss of the active conformation. Such a denaturation mechanism is in stark contrast to the desired specificity of drugs. The discussion is open.

[1]  H. Prinz,et al.  Transient binding patches: a plausible concept for drug binding , 2008, Journal of chemical biology.

[2]  Adam Yasgar,et al.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. Maelicke,et al.  Interaction of cholinergic ligands with the purified acetylcholine receptor protein. I. Equilibrium binding studies. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  Willem Soudijn,et al.  Allosteric modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors , 2001 .

[6]  Aron W Fenton,et al.  Allostery: an illustrated definition for the 'second secret of life'. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  James N. Weiss The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[9]  J. N. Langley On the reaction of cells and of nerve‐endings to certain poisons, chiefly as regards the reaction of striated muscle to nicotine and to curari , 1905, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .

[11]  Lila M Gierasch,et al.  The changing landscape of protein allostery. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  G. Reinhart,et al.  Reevaluation of the accepted allosteric mechanism of phosphofructokinase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  V. Lee,et al.  Characterization of two VQIXXK motifs for tau fibrillization in vitro. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[14]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Philip R. Evans,et al.  Structural basis of the allosteric behaviour of phosphofructokinase , 1990, Nature.