Estimation of Transpalatal Nasalance during Production of Voiced Stop Consonants by Noncleft Speakers Using an Oral-Nasal Mask

Objective: Our objective was to estimate nasalance due to transpalatal transfer of acoustic energy during production of voiced stop consonants by noncleft speakers. We also determined the relationship between the transpalatal nasalance and fundamental frequency (F0) of the speakers. Method: Participants were 8 men and 10 women (mean age = 21.9 years, SD = 4.0) without cleft palate who produced voiced stop (/b d g/) and nasal (/m n η/) consonants in syllables embedded in a carrier phrase. Participants also read the Zoo Passage. A divided OroNasal Nasality System mask was used to simultaneously obtain acoustic nasalance and airflow during production of the consonants. Both F0-derived and first formant (F1)–derived nasalance were computed. Results: F0-derived and F1-derived peak nasalance across all speakers ranged from a low of 20% to a high of 80% during production of stop consonants. An estimate of error from the combined sources of transoral transfer of energy (5%) and acoustic crossover between microphones (15%) was no greater than 20%. Analysis of variance revealed no significant effects of the sex of the speakers for either F0-derived or F1-derived nasalance of stops. There was a significant effect of the place of stop production for F0-derived nasalance (p;th< .05). Nonsignificant but positive correlations were found between the F0 of the speakers and F0-derived (r = .25) and F1-derived (r = .45) nasalance. Conclusions: Transpalatal transfer of oral acoustic energy accounts for most nasalance obtained during production of voiced stop consonants by noncleft speakers. F1-derived nasalance appears to better reflect transpalatal effects. Clinical implications are discussed.

[1]  H. Morris,et al.  Correspondence between Nasalance Scores and Listener Judgments of Hypernasality and Hyponasality , 1992 .

[2]  K. E. Lewis,et al.  The effect of vowels on nasalance scores. , 2000, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[3]  R. Dalston,et al.  The identification of nasal obstruction through clinical judgments of hyponasality and nasometric assessment of speech acoustics. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  S. Fletcher Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality. , 1972, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  D. Zajac Pressure-Flow Characteristics of /m/ and /p/ Production in Speakers without Cleft Palate: Developmental Findings , 2000 .

[6]  H. Morris,et al.  Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[7]  R M Dalston,et al.  Nasalance Scores in Noncleft Individuals: Why Not Zero? , 2001, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[8]  K. Fisher,et al.  Estimating phonation threshold pressure. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  E J Seaver,et al.  A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  T. Watterson,et al.  Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. , 1996, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  T J Hixon,et al.  Nasal air flow during normal speech production. , 1979, The Cleft palate journal.

[12]  J. Hoit,et al.  Age and velopharyngeal function during speech production. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  R. Dalston,et al.  Hypernasality in the presence of "adequate" velopharyngeal closure. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[14]  Herbert A. Leeper,et al.  Characteristics of nasalance in canadian speakers of English and French , 1992, ICSLP.

[15]  A. Beran Diagnosing Speech Disorders From Cleft Palate. , 1979 .

[16]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Theory and instrumentation for quantitative measurement of nasality. , 1970, The Cleft palate journal.

[17]  Rena Krakow,et al.  INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES FOR INVESTIGATING NASALIZATION AND VELOPHARYNGEAL FUNCTION IN THE LABORATORY: AN INTRODUCTION , 1993 .

[18]  Fredericka Bell‐Berti,et al.  UNDERSTANDING VELIC MOTOR CONTROL: STUDIES OF SEGMENTAL CONTEXT , 1993 .

[19]  P. Onghena,et al.  Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures designs for speech, language, and hearing research. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  M. Rothenberg A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal air flow waveform during voicing. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.