Investigation on Voltage Sags Caused by DG Anti-Islanding Protection

This paper investigates the voltage sag caused by distributed generation anti-islanding protection. This is a new power-quality concern associated with distributed generation expansion. Anti-islanding protection aims to disconnect distributed generators immediately after the opening of a recloser. As a consequence, after the reclosing operation, voltage sag will occur in some parts of the distribution system, since the loads are energized immediately but the generators are no longer present. In this context, this work presents the findings on our investigations about this problem. The results show that the resulting voltage sag level can violate power-quality limits. Thus, a set of indices has been introduced to characterize the severity of the voltage sag, and a load flow-based method has been proposed to predict the phenomenon. Sensitivity studies are also conducted in order to identify some key factors that influence this type of voltage depression.

[1]  L.A.F. Ferreira,et al.  Distributed Reactive Power Generation Control for Voltage Rise Mitigation in Distribution Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Nelson Kagan,et al.  Hybrid Method to Assess Sensitive Process Interruption Costs Due to Faults in Electric Power Distribution Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[3]  Jacinto Martin-Arnedo,et al.  Impact of distributed generation on distribution protection and power quality , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[4]  K. De Gusseme,et al.  Distributed Generation for Mitigating Voltage Dips in Low-Voltage Distribution Grids , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  Ali Saidian,et al.  The effect of size of DG on voltage flicker and voltage sag in closed-loop distribution system , 2010, 2010 5th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[6]  G. Carpinelli,et al.  Site and System Indices for Power-Quality Characterization of Distribution Networks With Distributed Generation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[7]  J.C.M. Vieira,et al.  Comparative analysis between synchronous and induction machines for distributed generation applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Distributed generation plant , 2010 .

[9]  Walmir Freitas,et al.  Method for determining the maximum allowable penetration level of distributed generation without steady-state voltage violations , 2010 .

[10]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[11]  E.R. Collins,et al.  Voltage Sags and the Response of a Synchronous Distributed Generator: A Case Study , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  Jawad Faiz,et al.  Electronic Tap-changer for Distribution Transformers , 2011 .

[13]  J. C. Das Effects of momentary voltage dips on the operation of induction and synchronous motors , 1989, Conference Record. Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference.

[14]  Gareth Harrison,et al.  Network Distributed Generation Capacity Analysis Using OPF With Voltage Step Constraints , 2010 .

[15]  H. Wayne Beaty,et al.  Electrical Power Systems Quality , 1995 .