The association of self-monitoring of blood glucose use with medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating non-insulin treatment.

BACKGROUND The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for persons with type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin remains controversial. This observational study compares the likelihood of medication adherence and change in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) for non-insulin-using patients using SMBG versus those not using SMBG. The study also assessed the association between diabetes medication adherence and SMBG use. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were extracted on 5,172 patients who began non-insulin diabetes medication between October 1, 2006, and March 31, 2009. The study assessed change in A1C associated with SMBG use and testing frequency at different categorical levels of baseline A1C. The likelihood of medication adherence for SMBG users was compared with that for non-SMBG users at different categorical levels of baseline A1C. The study further explored the interactions between SMBG use and medication adherence on change in A1C. RESULTS SMBG users had greater reductions in A1C compared with nonusers when the baseline A1C was ≥ 7%. Increasing SMBG frequency was associated with greater reductions in A1C. The study also examined the associations among SMBG use, medication adherence, and change in A1C. SMBG users had greater decreases in A1C for both medication-adherent and -nonadherent patients. As expected, medication adherence was associated with greater reductions in A1C for both SMBG nonusers and users. It is interesting that medication-nonadherent SMBG users had similar reductions in A1C compared with medication-adherent non-SMBG users. CONCLUSIONS Both SMBG use and medication adherence were associated with similar degrees of A1C reduction after controlling for baseline A1C, suggesting that both factors may be important for attaining glycemic control.

[1]  P. Diem,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[2]  Jennifer Y. Liu,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  Kathleen King,et al.  Medication Adherence and Associated Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes , 2004, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[4]  Aesha Drozdowski,et al.  Standards of medical care in diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[5]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[6]  A Gray,et al.  Blood glucose self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[7]  John D. Voss,et al.  The association between diabetes metabolic control and drug adherence in an indigent population. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[8]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Response to Comment on: Polonsky et al. Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Significantly Reduces A1C Levels in Poorly Controlled, Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the Structured Testing Program Study. Diabetes Care 2011;34:262–267 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Andrew St John,et al.  The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose: a review of recent evidence. , 2010, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[10]  S. Griffin,et al.  Adherence to hypoglycaemic medication among people with type 2 diabetes in primary care. , 2012, Primary care diabetes.

[11]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Significantly Reduces A1C Levels in Poorly Controlled, Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[12]  C. Kozma,et al.  Association between Sitagliptin Adherence and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[13]  Bradley C Martin,et al.  Good and poor adherence: optimal cut-point for adherence measures using administrative claims data , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[14]  Christopher G Parkin,et al.  A structured self-monitoring of blood glucose approach in type 2 diabetes encourages more frequent, intensive, and effective physician interventions: results from the STeP study. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[15]  Anuja Roy,et al.  Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  M. O'Kane,et al.  Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  G. Sartore,et al.  ROSES: role of self‐monitoring of blood glucose and intensive education in patients with Type 2 diabetes not receiving insulin. A pilot randomized clinical trial , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[18]  V. Basevi Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[19]  R. Gans,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in tablet-treated type 2 diabetic patients (ZODIAC). , 2010, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[20]  N. Suksomboon,et al.  Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: an update. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  A. Calle-Pascual,et al.  Benefits of self‐monitoring blood glucose in the management of new‐onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: The St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic‐based interventional study with parallel groups , 2010, Journal of diabetes.

[22]  W. Polonsky,et al.  The value of episodic, intensive blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin treated persons with type 2 diabetes: Design of the Structured Testing Program (STeP) Study, a cluster-randomised, clinical trial [NCT00674986] , 2010, BMC family practice.