Abstract Purpose Intrusion of the occupant compartment increases the risks for severe injury and death. This study analyzes rear sled and crash tests with an instrumented second-row Hybrid III 5th percentile anthropometric test device (ATD) to assess occupant kinematics and biomechanical responses with and without intrusion of the second-row seatback. Methods Three sled tests and four crash tests were conducted with a 1993 Ford Taurus and a belted 5th female ATD seated behind a belted 50th male ATD on the right-side of the vehicle. The sled tests were conducted at 25, 33 and 40 km/h and involved no intrusion. The first crash test was conducted with a passenger car striking the vehicle at 80 km/h with full centerline overlap. The second to fourth crash tests were with a Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) striking with a 50% overlap. Tests 2 and 3 were at 51 km/h and test 4, at 80 km/h impact speed. A large wooden speaker box was placed in the trunk of the Taurus in tests 3 and 4. Second-row intrusion was measured at the right-rear outboard package shelf retractor. Results The sled tests without intrusion had occupant responses below injury assessment reference values (IARVs). The right second-row ATD moved rearward relative to the interior, compressing the rear seatback until it rebounded forward. Occupant compartment intrusion of 12–77 cm in the crash tests pushed the ATD forward, increasing head and chest acceleration. The head, neck and chest biomechanical responses were below IARVs in crash tests 1 to 3 with minimal intrusion (≤ 25 cm). Most of the biomechanical responses were above IARVs for the right second-row ATD in test 4 with higher intrusion. The HIC increased with intrusion. Head acceleration was more than 2.5-times greater in test 3 than in test 2, highlighting the importance of cargo in rear crashes. Test 4 had 2.4-times more energy than test 3 and up to 7.7 times greater biomechanical responses with 77 cm of intrusion. Conclusions The crash tests show that intrusion increases occupant responses in the right second-row seat and pushes the occupant forward in rear impacts. The sled tests without intrusion had relatively low biomechanical responses. Intrusion was influenced by the crash energy and cargo.
[1]
Carol Conroy,et al.
The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity of drivers in head-on motor vehicle crashes.
,
2008,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[2]
C. Vagianos,et al.
Deformations and intrusions of the passenger compartment as indicators of injury severity and triage in head-on collisions of non-airbag-carrying vehicles.
,
2003,
Injury.
[3]
Priya Prasad,et al.
Relationships between passenger car seat back strength and occupant injury severity in rear end collisions: field and laboratory studies
,
1997
.
[4]
David C Viano,et al.
Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests
,
2018,
Traffic injury prevention.
[5]
David C Viano,et al.
Front-to-Rear Crashes Involving Two Vehicles With Severe Driver Injury
,
2012,
Traffic injury prevention.
[6]
Kristy B Arbogast,et al.
Passenger compartment intrusion as a predictor of significant injury for children in motor vehicle crashes.
,
2009,
The Journal of trauma.
[7]
C. Parenteau,et al.
The Effect of FMVSS 301R on Vehicle Structure in Rear Impact
,
2020
.
[8]
M C Frick,et al.
Seating position in cars and fatality risk.
,
1988,
American journal of public health.
[9]
David C Viano,et al.
Fatalities of Children 0–7 Years Old in the Second Row
,
2008,
Traffic injury prevention.