Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach

Objective: Mobility is an important construct in rehabilitation; many instruments have emerged which measure or assess (aspects of) mobility. In the selection or development of an appropriate technique, knowledge about the fundamentals of rehabilitation medicine is needed, as well as about essential characteristics of techniques and fundamental differences between them. The aim of this paper is to classify, assess and discuss current techniques which are or can be used to measure aspects of mobility. Design: Eight techniques (physical science techniques, clinimetry, observation, diaries, questionnaires, actigraphy, physiological techniques and activity monitors) are classified, assessed and discussed, based on the level of outcome measures, the aspect of mobility they measure, and methodological and practical criteria. Results and conclusions: Rehabilitation medicine has a particular need for instruments that enable measurement of outcome measures on the level of activity and role fulfilment. Techniques differ in the type and number of mobility aspects they measure. Furthermore, important differences exist based on methodological and practical criteria. One optimal technique does not exist: the choice of a technique always depends on a complexity of factors, such as clinical problem, research questions, the mobility aspect of interest, required methodological strength, costs and availability.

[1]  G. Lankhorst,et al.  Application of the ICIDH in rehabilitation medicine. , 1990, International disability studies.

[2]  E. Odding,et al.  Locomotor disability in the elderly : an epidemiological study of its occurrence and determinants in a general population of 55 years and over : the Rotterdam study , 1994 .

[3]  E M Badley,et al.  An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. , 1993, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  K. Brummel-smith.  Research in rehabilitation. , 1993, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[6]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Total free living energy expenditure in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  Introduction Investigating Mental Disorders in Their Natural Settings , 1987 .

[8]  M. Munot,et al.  Research Methodology , 2019, Storytelling with Data in Healthcare.

[9]  T. Findley,et al.  Research in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: VI. Research Project Management , 1989, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  R. H. Rozendal.  Clinical gait analysis: Problems and solutions? , 1991 .

[11]  Carl V. Granger,et al.  Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine , 1993 .

[12]  G. Lankhorst,et al.  Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. , 1995, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Fahrenberg,et al.  Assessment of posture and motion by multichannel piezoresistive accelerometer recordings. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[14]  E. Carr.  Observational methods in rehabilitation research , 1991 .

[15]  H J Montoye,et al.  Measurement of physical activity in population studies: a review. , 1984, Human biology.

[16]  An automatic device to measure time spent upright , 1994 .

[17]  R E LaPorte,et al.  The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group. , 1989, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[18]  J. Bussmann,et al.  A Device for Long Term Ambulatory Monitoring in Trans-tibial Amputees , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  F. Nouri,et al.  Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[20]  J. Fahrenberg,et al.  Ambulatory assessment : computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies , 1999 .

[21]  J. M. Rothstein.  Measurement in physical therapy , 1985 .

[22]  S. Hinderer,et al.  Functional outcome measures to assess interventions for spasticity. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  R A Keith,et al.  CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF OUTCOME MEASURES , 1995, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[24]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[25]  G. Lankhorst,et al.  The effect of the Swedish Back School in chronic idiopathic low back pain. A prospective controlled study. , 2015, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  William L. Buford.  Clinical assessment, objectivity, and the ubiquitous laws of instrumentation. , 1995, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[27]  C. Bouten.  Assessment of daily physical activity by registration of body movement , 1995 .

[28]  R. Klesges,et al.  The assessment of children's physical activity: a comparison of methods. , 1987, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  The design and conduct of true experiments and quasi-experiments in field settings , 1976 .

[30]  H J Montoye,et al.  The assessment of physical activity by questionnaire. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  P S Freedson,et al.  Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. , 1996, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[32]  David S. Krantz,et al.  Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[33]  K. Rush,et al.  A synthesis of selected literature on mobility: a basis for studying impaired mobility. , 1992, Nursing diagnosis : ND : the official journal of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.

[34]  D. J. Peters.  Disablement observed, addressed, and experienced: integrating subjective experience into disablement models. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[35]  S. Blanton,et al.  Standing Balance and Function over the Course of Acute Rehabilitation , 1997 .

[36]  B. Cartmel,et al.  Comparison of two physical activity questionnaires, with a diary, for assessing physical activity in an elderly population. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  J. Hobart,et al.  Physician and patient‐oriented outcomes in progressive neurological disease: which to measure? , 1996, Current opinion in neurology.

[38]  C J Snijders,et al.  Continuous measurements of spine movements in normal working situations over periods of 8 hours or more. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[39]  J. DeLuca,et al.  RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION: XII. Measurement Tools with Application to Brain Injury , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[40]  K M Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of sway as an indicator of functional balance in post-traumatic brain injury. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  D. Volterrani,et al.  Assessment of physical and mental activity using a standardized computer‐assisted diary during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring , 1993, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[42]  D. Stewart,et al.  The two-minute walking test: a sensitive index of mobility in the rehabilitation of elderly patients , 1990 .

[43]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[44]  D J Mason,et al.  Measurement of Activity , 1993, Nursing research.

[45]  H J Stam,et al.  Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[46]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[47]  R A Brand,et al.  Comment on criteria for patient evaluation tools. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[49]  C. Caspersen,et al.  Introduction to a Collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires , 1997 .

[50]  Norman C. Reynolds,et al.  Compliance, Reliability, and Validity of Self-Monitoring for Physical Disturbances of Parkinson's Disease: The Parkinson's Symptom Diary , 1990, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[51]  D. Robinson,et al.  The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[52]  P. Anastasiades,et al.  A simple activity measure for use with ambulatory subjects. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[53]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study , 1998, Pain.

[54]  E. Gelsema,et al.  Recognition of daily life motor activity classes using an artificial neural network. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[55]  M. Devries.  Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[56]  Bridging the Gap Between Laboratory and Clinic , 2000 .

[57]  R A Keith,et al.  Functional status and health status. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[58]  D. Duckworth.  Measuring disability: the role of the ICIDH. , 1995, Disability and rehabilitation.

[59]  Lankhorst Gj,et al.  The effect of the Swedish Back School in chronic idiopathic low back pain. A prospective controlled study. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.