Interaction of discrete and rhythmic movements over a wide range of periods

Abstract. This study investigates a complex task in which rhythmic and discrete components have to be combined in single-joint elbow rotations. While previous studies of similar tasks already reported that the initiation of the discrete movement is constrained to a particular phase window of the ongoing rhythmic movement, interpretations have remained contradictory due to differences in paradigms, oscillation frequencies, and data analysis techniques. The present study aims to clarify these findings and further elucidate the bidirectional nature of the interaction between discrete and rhythmic components. Participants performed single-degree-of-freedom elbow oscillatory movements at five prescribed periods (400, 500, 600, 800, 1000 ms). They rapidly switched the midpoint of oscillation to a second target after an auditory signal that occurred at a random phase of the oscillation, without stopping the oscillation. Results confirmed that the phase of the discrete movement initiation is highly constrained with respect to the oscillation period. Further, the duration, peak velocity, and the overshoot of the discrete movement varied systematically with the period of the rhythmic movement. Effects of the discrete-onto-rhythmic component were seen in a phase resetting of the oscillation and a systematic acceleration after the discrete movement, which also varied as a function of the oscillation period. These results are interpreted in terms of an inhibitory bidirectional coupling between discrete and rhythmic movement. The interaction between discrete and rhythmic movement elements is discussed in comparison to sequential and gating processes suggested previously.

[1]  L. E. Travis The relation of voluntary movements to tremors. , 1929 .

[2]  R R Young,et al.  Analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements at the elbow in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[4]  A. G. Feldman Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man , 1980, Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  M. Latash Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements , 1992, Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Wierzbicka,et al.  Relationship between tremor and the onset of rapid voluntary contraction in Parkinson's disease. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  R. Elble,et al.  Essential Tremor Entrains Rapid Voluntary Movements , 1994, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  W Wolf,et al.  Tremor as a factor in prolonged reaction times of Parkinsonian patients , 1995, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[10]  G Staude,et al.  Quantitative assessment of phase entrainment between discrete and cyclic motor actions , 1997, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[11]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Force and Timing Variability in Rhythmic Unimanual Tapping , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Interaction of rhythmic and discrete pattern generators in single-joint movements , 2000 .

[14]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Merging different motor patterns: Coordination between rhythmical and discrete single-joint movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring the functional significance of physiological tremor: A biospectroscopic approach , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.