Regional moment:magnitude relations for earthquakes and explosions

The authors present M[sub o]:m[sub b] relations using m[sub b](P[sub n]) and m[sub b](L[sub g]) for earthquakes and explosions occurring in tectonic and stable areas. The observations for m[sub b](P[sub n]) range from about 3 to 6 and show excellent separation between earthquakes and explosions on M[sub o]:m[sub b] plots, independent of the magnitude. The scatter in M[sub o]:M[sub b] observations for NTS explosions is small compared to the earthquake data. The M[sub o]:m[sub b](L[sub g]) data for Soviet explosions overlay the observations for US explosions. These results, and the small scatter for NTS explosions, suggest weak dependence of M[sub o]:m[sub b] relations on emplacement media. A simple theoretical model is developed which matches all these observations. The model uses scaling similarity and conservation of energy to provide a physical link between seismic moment and a broadband seismic magnitude. Three factors, radiation pattern, material property, and apparent stress, contribute to the separation between earthquakes and explosions. This theoretical separation is independent of broadband magnitude. For US explosions in different media, the material property and apparent stress contributions are shown to compensate for one another, supporting the observations that M[sub o]:M[sub b] is nearly independent of source geology. 19 refs., 2more » figs., 1 tab.« less

[1]  J. W. Given,et al.  Estimating Explosion and Tectonic Release Source Parameters of Underground Nuclear Explosions from Rayleigh and Love Wave Observations. Part 1 , 1986 .

[2]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Yield estimates of nevada test site explosions obtained from seismic Lg waves , 1986 .

[3]  David M. Boore,et al.  Average body-wave radiation coefficients , 1984 .

[4]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Surface wave focal mechanisms for eastern North American earthquakes with tectonic implications , 1979 .

[5]  J. L. Stevens,et al.  The physical basis of mb:Ms and variable frequency magnitude methods for earthquake/explosion discrimination. Topical report , 1982 .

[6]  S. R. Taylor,et al.  Investigation of mb and MS formulas for the Western United States and their impact on the MS/mb discriminant , 1987 .

[7]  F. N. App,et al.  Modelling surface motion and spall at the Nevada Test Site. Los Alamos Source Region Project , 1992 .

[8]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[9]  William R. Perret,et al.  Seismic-source energies of underground nuclear explosions , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Regional discrimination between NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes , 1989 .

[11]  Max Wyss,et al.  Stress estimates for South American shallow and deep earthquakes , 1970 .

[12]  Dennis M. Goodman,et al.  A case study of the seismic source function: Salmon and sterling reevaluated , 1990 .

[13]  H. J. Patton,et al.  Seismic Moment tensors of western U.S. earthquakes and implications for the tectonic stress field , 1991 .

[14]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Lg magnitudes of selected East Kazakhstan underground explosions , 1986 .

[15]  Howard J. Patton,et al.  Application of Nuttli's method to estimate yield of Nevada Test Site explosions recorded on Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Digital Seismic System , 1988 .

[16]  Jeffry L. Stevens,et al.  Estimation of scalar moments from explosion-generated surface waves , 1986 .