When relative clause extraposition is the right choice, it’s easier

In one type of Relative Clause Extraposition (RCE) in English, a subject-modifying relative clause occurs in a displaced position following the matrix VP, as in: Some options were considered that allow for more flexibility. Although RCE incurs a discontinuous dependency and is relatively infrequent in discourse, previous corpus and acceptability judgment studies have shown that speakers prefer RCE over adjacent ordering when the RC is long in relation to the VP, the subject NP is indefinite, and the main verb is passive/presentative (Francis, 2010 ; Francis & Michaelis, 2014 ; Walker, 2013 ). The current study is the first to relate these conditional preferences to online measures of production. For a spoken production task that required speakers to construct sentences based on visual cues, results showed that the same factors that modulate choice of structure – VP length, RC length, and definiteness of the subject NP – also modulate voice initiation time. That is, when the sentential context warrants a particular structure, that structure becomes easier to produce. Following the approach of MacDonald ( 2013 ), we explain these findings in terms of two production biases, one of which favors early placement of shorter, more accessible phrases and the other of which promotes rapid retrieval from memory of the most frequently used subtypes of a construction.

[1]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Put in last position something previously unmentioned: Word order effects on referential expectancy and reference comprehension , 2008 .

[2]  Bas Aarts,et al.  Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English , 2002 .

[3]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[4]  Heike Walker Constraints on relative clause extraposition in English: An experimental investigation , 2013 .

[5]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Susannah Kirby,et al.  A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences , 2012 .

[7]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  Constructional Meaning and Compositionality , 2009 .

[8]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Rightward movement in a comparative perspective , 2013 .

[9]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[10]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[11]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production , 2012 .

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[13]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Intuitions in linguistic argumentation , 2005 .

[14]  Hans C. Boas,et al.  Sign-Based Construction Grammar , 2012 .

[15]  C. L. Baker,et al.  The Logical problem of language acquisition , 1984 .

[16]  Paul Kay,et al.  Cleaning up the Big Mess: Discontinuous Dependencies and Complex Determiners , 2012 .

[17]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[19]  Lise Menn Looking for a ‘gold standard’ to measure language complexity: What psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics can (and can’t) offer to formal linguistics , 2012 .

[20]  Michelle L. Gregory,et al.  Topicalization and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited☆ , 2001 .

[21]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[22]  L Konieczny,et al.  Locality and Parsing Complexity , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  A Rne L Ohman Domain minimization and beyond: Modeling prepositional phrase ordering , 2013 .

[24]  I. Krämer,et al.  Cognitive foundations of interpretation , 2007 .

[25]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[26]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English , 2005 .

[27]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[28]  Mark Davies The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990―2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights , 2009 .

[29]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The processing of extraposed structures in English , 2012, Cognition.

[31]  Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English , 2012 .

[32]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Remarks on grammatical weight , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[33]  M. Corley,et al.  Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  L. Uyechi,et al.  Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language & Life , 2008 .

[35]  Wojciech Skut,et al.  Studien zur performanzorientierten Linguistik , 1998, Kognitionswissenschaft.

[36]  久野 暲,et al.  Functional constraints in grammar : on the unergative-unaccusative distinction , 2004 .

[37]  Barbara John A Thomas Lohse,et al.  Domain Minimization in English Verb-Particle Constructions , 2004 .

[38]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[39]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[40]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[41]  Stefan Thomas Gries,et al.  Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement , 2003 .

[42]  Franklin P. Tamborello,et al.  Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope , 2010, Cognition.

[43]  Holger Diessel,et al.  Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English , 2008 .

[44]  Elaine J. Francis Grammatical weight and relative clause extraposition in English , 2010 .

[45]  M. Baltin Chapter 25. Extraposition , 2007 .

[46]  S. Kuno,et al.  Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the unergative–unaccusative distinction , 2004 .

[47]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Measuring Grammatical Complexity , 2014 .

[48]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Lexical availability and grammatical encoding scope during spoken sentence production , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  L. Wheeldon,et al.  Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency , 2014 .

[51]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning , 2014 .

[52]  Gabriella Hermon,et al.  Extraposition and the complement principle , 1990 .

[53]  Geoffrey J. Huck,et al.  Extraposition and focus , 1990 .

[54]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[55]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond Manner–Place–Time , 1999, Language Variation and Change.

[56]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  Rens Bod,et al.  Exemplar-based syntax: How to get productivity from examples , 2006 .

[58]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .

[59]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[60]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[61]  Elma Kerz,et al.  The positioning of concessive adverbial clauses in English: assessing the importance of discourse-pragmatic and processing-based constraints1 , 2013, English Language and Linguistics.

[62]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[63]  Thomas Wasov,et al.  Postverbal behavior , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[64]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .

[65]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .