Unilateral neglect syndrome rehabilitation by trunk rotation and scanning training.

OBJECTIVE Assessment of a new rehabilitation method for unilateral neglect syndrome (UNS), using a specific device (Bon Saint Come's device) that associates exploratory reconditioning with voluntary trunk rotation. DESIGN Study 1, randomized control trial during 2 months; study 2, nonrandomized control trial during 2 months. SETTING Neurorehabilitation units in private and public center. PATIENTS In study 1, 22 consecutive patients with UNS resulting from recent stroke (< 3 months) were randomly assigned to an Experimental Group (11 patients) or to a Control Group (11 patients). The 2 groups were very similar in terms of general and neurological data. In study 2, 5 consecutive patients with chronic UNS resulting from an old stroke (> 6 months) showing the same characteristics were included. INTERVENTION In study 1, patients in Group E followed the experimental program 1 hour a day for 1 month (20 hours) and Group C followed usual neurorehabilitation during the same time. In study 2, every patient followed the experimental program 1 hour a day for 1 month (20 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Assessment in both studies was done at day 0, day 30, and day 60 using a battery of UNS tests (Albert, Scheckenberg, bell) and an activities of daily living (ADL) test (the Functional Independence Measure [FIM]). Mean scores of each test were compared between the 2 groups with the Wilcoxon nonparametric test. RESULTS In study 1 all UNS test results and the FIM improved significantly more in Group E than in Group C. In Group E, UNS disappeared in 5 patients and improved in 6. In Group C, UNS disappeared in 1 patient, improved in 4, and was unchanged in 6. In Study 2, UNS remitted in 2 patients, improved in 2 patients, and was unchanged in 1. CONCLUSION The Bon Saint Come method seems to significantly improve recent and chronic UNS, as well as ADL function. These encouraging results could have resulted from a synergistic effect of spatial reconditioning and voluntary trunk rotation. It must be assessed by a new study with more patients.

[1]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[2]  K. Ragnarsson,et al.  Perceptual remediation in patients with right brain damage: a comprehensive program. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: The role of hemispace, hand and motor activation , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[5]  H. Karnath,et al.  Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  B. Bussel,et al.  Devenir des hémiplégies vasculaires par atteinte sylvienne en fonction du côté de la lésion , 1975 .

[7]  R L Hewer,et al.  Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  I. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: theoretical and rehabilitation implications. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[9]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  L. Gerstman,et al.  Training sensory awareness and spatial organization in people with right brain damage. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Marcus J. Fuhrer,et al.  Rehabilitation outcomes : analysis and measurement , 1987 .

[13]  I. Robertson,et al.  Microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect: a randomized controlled trial. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  A rehabilitation study of hemispatial neglect , 1994 .

[15]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Rehabilitation of Unilateral Neglect: A Controlled Multiple-Baseline-Across-Subjects Trial Using Computerised Training Procedures , 1997 .

[16]  A. Hein,et al.  Neck muscle vibration modifies the representation of visual motion and direction in man. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[18]  M. Hommel,et al.  Effects of passive tactile and auditory stimuli on left visual neglect. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[19]  J Weinberg,et al.  Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage. , 1977, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  H. Chui,et al.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. , 1987, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[21]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[22]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[23]  S. Paolucci,et al.  Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  H. Karnath.  Disturbed coordinate transformation in the neural representation of space as the crucial mechanism leading to neglect , 1994 .

[25]  B. Hamilton.  A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. , 1987 .

[26]  G. Denes,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  M. Albert.  A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.