The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity

The cognitive processes and neural mechanisms underlying deceptive responses were studied using behavioral responses (RT) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants made truthful and deceptive responses about perceived and remembered stimuli. Memorized words were presented in a recognition paradigm under three instructional conditions: Consistent Truthful, Consistent Deceptive, Random Deceptive. Responses that conflicted with the truth about both perceived and remembered items produced the same pattern of slower RTs and decreased LPC amplitudes. When long-term response patterns were monitored, RTs became much slower and LPC amplitudes decreased greatly. The different behavioral and ERP changes in the two deception conditions suggested that two dissociable executive control processes, each requiring additional processing resources, can contribute to deceptive responses. The parietal episodic memory (EM) effect, thought to reflect recollection, was unaffected by whether participants responded truthfully or deceptively suggesting that it provides a measure of guilty knowledge.

[1]  Ray Johnson For Distinguished Early Career Contribution to Psychophysiology: Award Address, 1985 , 1986 .

[2]  Michael E. Smith Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[4]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective , 1989 .

[5]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Neural events that underlie remembering something that never happened , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Allen,et al.  A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[9]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials (ERPs) by word repetition in a task with inconsistent mapping between repetition and response. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[11]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 latency, but not amplitude or topography, distinguishes between true and false recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  ERP correlates of true and false recognition after different retention delays: stimulus- and response-related processes. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[13]  John J. B. Allen The role of psychophysiology in clinical assessment: ERPs in the evaluation of memory. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[14]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals' average waveforms. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[15]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 scalp amplitude distribution as an index of deception in a simulated cognitive deficit model. , 1999, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[17]  A. Turken,et al.  Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Knott,et al.  Regarding the American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature: a commentary on the proposal to change the 10-20 electrode designators. , 1993, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[19]  C. Doucet,et al.  The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[20]  R. Johnson,et al.  A spatio-temporal analysis of recognition-related event-related brain potentials. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Penney,et al.  Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[24]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  P300 and long-term memory: latency predicts recognition performance. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[27]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Detection of simulated malingering using forced choice recognition enhanced with event-related potential recording , 1996 .

[29]  Robert W. Mitchell,et al.  Deception, perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit , 1986 .

[30]  E Donchin,et al.  The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Test of Directed Forgetting: The Role of Retrieval Inhibition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[33]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[34]  C D Wickens,et al.  Processing of stimulus properties: evidence for dual-task integrality. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Ray Johnson,et al.  The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  B. Kopell,et al.  The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. , 1981, Science.

[37]  G. Karmos,et al.  Perspectives of Event-Related Potentials Research , 1995 .

[38]  J. Allen,et al.  The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[39]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 correlates of simulated malingered amnesia in a matching-to-sample task: topographic analyses of deception versus truthtelling responses. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[40]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Rugg,et al.  Memory retrieval: an electrophysiological perspective , 1999 .

[42]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[43]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[44]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  True But Not False Memories Produce a Sensory Signature in Human Lateralized Brain Potentials , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Joel P Rosenfeld,et al.  Alternative Views of Bashore and Rapp's (1993) Alternatives to Traditional Polygraphy: A Critique , 1995 .

[48]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[49]  R. Barry,et al.  Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[50]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300: evidence from temporal lobectomy patients. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[51]  C D Wickens,et al.  The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload , 1980, Human factors.

[52]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  An event‐related potential study of retroactive interference in memory , 1997, Neuroreport.

[53]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[54]  W. Sommer,et al.  Postperceptual effects and P300 latency. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[55]  J J Furedy,et al.  Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[56]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[57]  Theodore R. Bashore,et al.  Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures , 1993 .

[58]  R. Johnson A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[59]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  Oddball-evoked P300-based method of deception detection in the laboratory. II: Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge. , 1992, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[60]  R. Ragot,et al.  Electrophysiological study of intrahemispheric S-R compatibility effects elicited by visual directional cues. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[61]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  The objective assessment of amnesia in dissociative identity disorder using event-related potentials. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[62]  M. Coles,et al.  Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.