Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas

We developed interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas (excluding Antarctica) at a spatial resolution of 30 arc s (often referred to as 1‐km spatial resolution). The climate elements considered were monthly precipitation and mean, minimum, and maximum temperature. Input data were gathered from a variety of sources and, where possible, were restricted to records from the 1950–2000 period. We used the thin‐plate smoothing spline algorithm implemented in the ANUSPLIN package for interpolation, using latitude, longitude, and elevation as independent variables. We quantified uncertainty arising from the input data and the interpolation by mapping weather station density, elevation bias in the weather stations, and elevation variation within grid cells and through data partitioning and cross validation. Elevation bias tended to be negative (stations lower than expected) at high latitudes but positive in the tropics. Uncertainty is highest in mountainous and in poorly sampled areas. Data partitioning showed high uncertainty of the surfaces on isolated islands, e.g. in the Pacific. Aggregating the elevation and climate data to 10 arc min resolution showed an enormous variation within grid cells, illustrating the value of high‐resolution surfaces. A comparison with an existing data set at 10 arc min resolution showed overall agreement, but with significant variation in some regions. A comparison with two high‐resolution data sets for the United States also identified areas with large local differences, particularly in mountainous areas. Compared to previous global climatologies, ours has the following advantages: the data are at a higher spatial resolution (400 times greater or more); more weather station records were used; improved elevation data were used; and more information about spatial patterns of uncertainty in the data is available. Owing to the overall low density of available climate stations, our surfaces do not capture of all variation that may occur at a resolution of 1 km, particularly of precipitation in mountainous areas. In future work, such variation might be captured through knowledge‐based methods and inclusion of additional co‐variates, particularly layers obtained through remote sensing. Copyright © 2005 Royal Meteorological Society.

[1]  Proceedings of an international workshop on the structure of a digital international soil resources map anex data base, 20 - 24 January 1986 at the International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands , 1986 .

[2]  W. Cramer,et al.  The IIASA database for mean monthly values of temperature , 1991 .

[3]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  Creation of homogeneous composite climatological reference series , 1994 .

[4]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  A new method for detecting undocumented discontinuities in climatological time series , 1995 .

[5]  M. F. Hutchinson,et al.  Interpolating Mean Rainfall Using Thin Plate Smoothing Splines , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  P. Briggs,et al.  Topographic Bias in Mesoscale Precipitation Networks , 1996 .

[7]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[8]  R. Vose,et al.  An Overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network Temperature Database , 1997 .

[9]  Report on visit to Winand Starting Centre and the International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1-3 December , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  Global historical climatology network (GHCN) quality control of monthly temperature data , 1998 .

[11]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[12]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Interpolation techniques for climate variables , 1999 .

[13]  FloraMap: A computer tool for predicting the distribution of plants and other organisms in the Wild , 2000 .

[14]  Neil Stuart,et al.  A Comparison among Strategies for Interpolating Maximum and Minimum Daily Air Temperatures. Part I: The Selection of “Guiding” Topographic and Land Cover Variables , 2001 .

[15]  N. Stuart,et al.  A comparison among strategies for interpolating maximum and minimum daily air temperatures. Part II: The interaction between number of guiding variables and the type of interpolation method , 2001 .

[16]  M. Hulme,et al.  A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas , 2002 .

[17]  C. Daly,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate , 2002 .

[18]  Bruno Condori,et al.  A quantitative and constraint-specific method to assess the potential impact of new agricultural technology : the case of frost resistant potato for the Altiplano (Peru and Bolivia) , 2003 .

[19]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Evaluating alternative data sets for ecological niche models of birds in the Andes , 2004 .

[20]  Qinghua Guo,et al.  The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Mark Mulligan,et al.  Practical use of SRTM data in the tropics : Comparisons with digital elevation models generated cartographic data , 2004 .

[22]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids , 2005 .