A multivariate regression parametric study on DEM input parameters of free-flowing and cohesive powders with experimental data-based validation

One of the key challenges in the implementation of discrete element method (DEM) to model powder’s flow is the appropriate selection of material parameters, where empirical approaches are mostly applied. The aim of this study is to develop an alternative systematic numerical approach that can efficiently and accurately predict the influence of different DEM parameters on various sought macroscopic responses, where, accordingly, model validation based on experimental data is applied. Therefore, design of experiment and multivariate regression analysis, using an optimized quadratic D-optimal design model and new analysis tools, i.e., adjusted response and Pareto graphs, are applied. A special focus is laid on the impact of six DEM microscopic input parameters (i.e., coefficients of static and rolling friction, coefficient of restitution, particle size, Young’s modulus and cohesion energy density) on five macroscopic output responses (i.e., angle of repose, porosity, mass flow rate, translational kinetic energy and computation time) using angle of repose tests applied to free-flowing and cohesive powders. The underlying analyses and tests show, for instance, the substantial impact of the rolling friction coefficient and the minor role of the static friction coefficient or the particle size on the angle of repose in cohesive powders. In addition, in both powders, the porosity parameter is highly influenced by the static and rolling friction coefficients.

[1]  C. J. Coetzee,et al.  Calibration of the discrete element method and the effect of particle shape , 2016 .

[2]  Mehari Z. Tekeste,et al.  A coupled sliding and rolling friction model for DEM calibration , 2017 .

[3]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[4]  C. Kloss,et al.  Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM , 2012 .

[5]  I. Larson,et al.  Use of surface energy distributions by inverse gas chromatography to understand mechanofusion processing and functionality of lactose coated with magnesium stearate. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  Guofa Li,et al.  Electromagnetic field models' building and simulation in workpiece of inductive disassembling of bearing inner race , 2011, 2011 Second International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering.

[7]  Changyou Li,et al.  Porosity of flowing rice layer: Experiments and numerical simulation , 2019, Biosystems Engineering.

[8]  H. Saxén,et al.  Numerical and experimental studies of the effect of iron ore particle shape on repose angle and porosity of a heap , 2019, Powder Technology.

[9]  R. Jones,et al.  From Single Particle AFM Studies of Adhesion and Friction to Bulk Flow: Forging the Links , 2003 .

[10]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Flow characteristics and discharge rate of ellipsoidal particles in a flat bottom hopper , 2014 .

[11]  A V Boikov,et al.  DEM Calibration Approach: design of experiment , 2018 .

[12]  Mical William Johnstone Calibration of DEM models for granular materials using bulk physical tests , 2010 .

[13]  Bruno C. Hancock,et al.  An implementation of granular dynamics for simulating frictional elastic particles based on the DL_POLY code , 2005, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[14]  T. Pugsley,et al.  Flowability of moist pharmaceutical powders , 2009 .

[15]  Johannes Khinast,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Tablet Properties for Discrete Element Modeling of an Active Coating Process , 2013, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[16]  Raymond D. Mindlin,et al.  Compliance of elastic bodies in contact , 1949 .

[17]  Yusuke Shigeto,et al.  Numerical simulation of industrial die filling using the discrete element method , 2015 .

[18]  Dingena L. Schott,et al.  Automated discrete element method calibration using genetic and optimization algorithms , 2017 .

[19]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Modelling and understanding powder flow properties and compactability of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients, excipients and physical mixtures from critical material properties. , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[20]  Bernd Markert,et al.  Modeling of hydraulic fracturing using a porous-media phase-field approach with reference to experimental data , 2018, Engineering Fracture Mechanics.

[21]  Kevin J. Hanley,et al.  A Methodical Calibration Procedure for Discrete Element Models , 2017 .

[22]  C. Thornton,et al.  A comparison of discrete element simulations and experiments for ‘sandpiles’ composed of spherical particles , 2005 .

[23]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[24]  Dingena L. Schott,et al.  Micro–macro properties of quartz sand: Experimental investigation and DEM simulation , 2015 .

[25]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations , 2011 .

[26]  Aibing Yu,et al.  DEM study of the flow of cohesive particles in a screw feeder , 2014 .

[27]  J. Liu,et al.  DEM analysis of pile installation effect: comparing a bored and a driven pile , 2018, Granular Matter.

[28]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Prediction of screw conveyor performance using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) , 2009 .

[29]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  Deliang Zhou,et al.  Understanding Material Properties in Pharmaceutical Product Development and Manufacturing: Powder Flow and Mechanical Properties , 2010 .

[31]  E. Hugh Stitt,et al.  A parametric evaluation of powder flowability using a Freeman rheometer through statistical and sensitivity analysis: A discrete element method (DEM) study , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Impact breakage of spherical, cuboidal and cylindrical agglomerates , 2010 .

[33]  Pritam Ganguly,et al.  Systematic coarse-graining methods for soft matter simulations - a review , 2013 .

[34]  Balaji Prabhu,et al.  Microstructural And Mechanical Characterization Of Al-al2o3 Nanocomposites Synthesized By High-energy Milling , 2005 .

[35]  Reg Freeman,et al.  Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders — A comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell , 2007 .

[36]  Andy Ingram,et al.  Developing Mechanistic Understanding of Granular Behaviour in Complex Moving Geometry using the Discrete Element Method. Part A: Measurement and Reconstruction of Turbula Mixer Motion using Positron Emission Particle Tracking , 2010 .

[37]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Modeling Behaviour of Railway Ballast in Prismoidal Apparatus Using Discrete Element Method , 2016 .

[38]  Weijun Yu,et al.  Particle shape characterization of fluidized catalytic cracking catalyst powders using the mean value and distribution of shape factors , 2002 .

[39]  Michele Marigo,et al.  Developing mechanistic understanding of granular behaviour in complex moving geometry using the Discrete Element Method: Part B: Investigation of flow and mixing in the Turbula® mixer , 2011 .

[40]  Christopher M. Wensrich,et al.  Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM , 2012 .

[41]  A. Chiu,et al.  Preoperative treatment with 5α-reductase inhibitors and the risk of hemorrhagic events in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate – A population-based cohort study , 2018, Clinics.

[42]  Rimantas Kačianauskas,et al.  COMPACTING OF PARTICLES FOR BIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST BY THE DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD , 2006 .

[43]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Discrete element simulations of dense packings and heaps made of spherical and non-spherical particles , 2000 .

[44]  M. Oda,et al.  Micro-Deformation Mechanism of Shear Banding Process Based on Modified Distinct Element Method , 1999 .

[45]  James Bowen,et al.  Relationship between single and bulk mechanical properties for zeolite ZSM5 spray-dried particles , 2014 .

[46]  Klaus Thoeni,et al.  Probabilistic calibration of discrete element simulations using the sequential quasi-Monte Carlo filter , 2018 .

[47]  Omar S. Baghabra Al-Amoudi,et al.  A review on the angle of repose of granular materials , 2018 .

[48]  R L Carr,et al.  EVALUATING FLOW PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS , 1965 .

[49]  A. Yu,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: Theoretical developments , 2007 .

[50]  Lauren Beach Effect of dry particle coating on the properties of cohesive pharmaceutical powders , 2011 .

[51]  S. Parker,et al.  Adhesion and adhesives , 1966 .

[52]  S. Turek,et al.  A new monolithic Newton‐multigrid‐based FEM solution scheme for large strain dynamic poroelasticity problems , 2017 .

[53]  Jürgen Hesser,et al.  Discrete element method (DEM) simulation and validation of a screw feeder system , 2016 .

[54]  André Katterfeld,et al.  Scaling of the angle of repose test and its influence on the calibration of DEM parameters using upscaled particles , 2018 .

[55]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  Reduced-order discrete element method modeling , 2013 .

[56]  Torsten Kraft,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element models for the granular statics and dynamics of powders in cavity filling , 2009 .

[57]  M. Marigo,et al.  Discrete Element Method (DEM) for Industrial Applications: Comments on Calibration and Validation for the Modelling of Cylindrical Pellets , 2015 .

[58]  C. J. Coetzee,et al.  Review: Calibration of the discrete element method , 2017 .

[59]  S. Luding,et al.  Influence of coarse-graining parameters on the analysis of DEM simulations of silo flow , 2016 .

[60]  P. Radziszewski,et al.  Virtual soil calibration for wheel–soil interaction simulations using the discrete-element method , 2011 .

[61]  Arno Kwade,et al.  A Ring Shear Tester as Calibration Experiment for DEM Simulations in Agitated Mixers – A Sensitivity Study , 2015 .

[62]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  Characterization of powder flow: Static and dynamic testing , 2009 .

[63]  J. Trygg,et al.  Design Space Estimation of the Roller Compaction Process , 2013 .

[64]  Paul Zulli,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of the angle of repose of coarse spheres , 2002 .

[65]  T. Roessler,et al.  Development of a standard calibration procedure for the DEM parameters of cohesionless bulk materials – part I: Solving the problem of ambiguous parameter combinations , 2019, Powder Technology.

[66]  M. Marigo,et al.  Discrete element modelling (DEM) input parameters: understanding their impact on model predictions using statistical analysis , 2015, CPM 2015.

[67]  Josephine M. Boac,et al.  MATERIAL AND INTERACTION PROPERTIES OF SELECTED GRAINS AND OILSEEDS FOR MODELING DISCRETE PARTICLES , 2010 .

[68]  Y. Heider,et al.  A diffusive dynamic brittle fracture model for heterogeneous solids and porous materials with implementation using a user-element subroutine , 2018, Computational Materials Science.

[69]  G. Lodewijks,et al.  DEM speedup: Stiffness effects on behavior of bulk material , 2014 .

[70]  Stefan Pirker,et al.  Identification of DEM simulation parameters by Artificial Neural Networks and bulk experiments , 2016 .

[71]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Spatial and temporal coarse-graining for DEM analysis , 2013 .

[72]  Nicolas Vandewalle,et al.  Measuring the flowing properties of powders and grains , 2012 .

[73]  A. Kwade,et al.  Segregation of particulate solids: Experiments and DEM simulations , 2014 .

[74]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  DEM study of mechanical characteristics of multi-spherical and superquadric particles at micro and macro scales , 2018 .