Supporting the unremarkable:experiences with the obje Display Mirror

Many believe that ubiquitous computing will succeed when it has faded into the background of everyday life and work—that is, when it has become mundane. This paper examines the potential for technology to enhance users’ experience of their environments through the improvement of the unremarkable activities that comprise everyday experience. Based on a year-long longitudinal study, we describe how we designed, deployed, and evaluated technology to support and enhance a common but unremarkable practice: the act of connecting a portable computer to a shared display (e.g., VGA projector). We found that new capabilities of our technology introduced subtle but significant changes in the practices surrounding the sharing of information in meetings. However, we also met with substantial challenges in terms of deployment, adoption, and evaluation. We analyze and discuss these challenges in depth, in order to inform the design of future mundane, pervasive applications.

[1]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[2]  S. M. McCune,et al.  American Behavioral Scientist , 1977 .

[3]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[4]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[5]  Ling Bao,et al.  A context-aware experience sampling tool , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  David J. Scott,et al.  The Carrot Approach: Encouraging Use of Location Systems , 2004, UbiComp.

[7]  James A. Landay,et al.  Making Sharing Pervasive: Ubiquitous Computing for Shared Note Taking , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[8]  Marisa E. Campbell.  CHI 2002 , 2002, INTR.

[9]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  User Study Techniques in the Design and Evaluation of a Ubicomp Environment , 2002, UbiComp.

[10]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[11]  H. Garfinkel,et al.  Temporal order in laboratory work , 1983 .

[12]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Human Experience , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[14]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation , 1999, CHI '99.

[15]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[16]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The world is not a desktop , 1994, INTR.

[17]  M. Orhon.  The X Window System , 2005 .

[18]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[19]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Designing Calm Technology , 2004 .

[20]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[21]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Ambient Displays: Turning Architectural Space into an Interface between People and Digital Information , 1998, CoBuild.

[22]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication requirements for group support , 1991 .

[23]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The challenges of user-centered design and evaluation for infrastructure , 2003, CHI '03.

[24]  Armando Fox,et al.  The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[25]  Lisa Bud-Frierman.  Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business , 1994 .

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[27]  Scott D. Mainwaring,et al.  Infrastructures and Their Discontents: Implications for Ubicomp , 2004, UbiComp.

[28]  James Gettys,et al.  The X window system , 1986, TOGS.

[29]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Unremarkable computing , 2002, CHI.

[30]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .