Elucidating Molecular Overlays from Pairwise Alignments Using a Genetic Algorithm

Inferring the relative bioactive poses between active molecules is a common problem in drug discovery. The use of rapid pairwise alignment algorithms in conjunction with rigid conformer libraries has become a prevalent approach to this problem. These programs can be easily used to compare two molecules or suggest alternatives to a single known active. However, it is not obvious how to combine pairwise alignments between multiple actives into an overlay that reproduces the binding mode of those actives in the target receptor. We describe a new algorithm, DIFGAPE (DIstance geometry Focused Genetic Algorithm Pose Evaluator) that, given pairwise alignments of conformers of active compounds, attempts to reproduce overlays of ligand binding modes. The software was evaluated on 13 test systems from 9 protein targets using associated ligands extracted from the PDB. Starting from 2D ligand structures with no protein information, we were able in 4 systems to approximate the crystallographically observed binding mode. For example, the prediction for a set of 11 ligands targeting FXa had 1.6 A rmsd to crystal structure coordinates. Finally, the evaluation illustrated current challenges for molecular conformer generators and pairwise alignment algorithms.

[1]  Simon K. Kearsley,et al.  An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap , 1990 .

[2]  Sung Jin Cho,et al.  FLAME: A Program to Flexibly Align Molecules. , 2006 .

[3]  R. Sheridan,et al.  SQ: a program for rapidly producing pharmacophorically relevent molecular superpositions. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Christian Lemmen,et al.  Computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[5]  Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Virtual screening : an overview , 1998 .

[6]  Shuichi Hirono,et al.  Estimation of active conformations of drugs by a new molecular superposing procedure , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  P. Labute,et al.  Flexible alignment of small molecules. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  L. Hardy,et al.  The impact of structure-guided drug design on clinical agents , 2003 .

[9]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists , 1993, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[11]  C. Lemmen,et al.  FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Carmen Almansa,et al.  Dissection of the recognition properties of p38 MAP kinase. Determination of the binding mode of a new pyridinyl-heterocycle inhibitor family. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Magdalena Bacilieri,et al.  Ligand-based drug design methodologies in drug discovery process: an overview. , 2006, Current drug discovery technologies.

[15]  Michal Vieth,et al.  Geometric Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Molecular Overlays , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Andrew Smellie,et al.  Identification of Common Functional Configurations Among Molecules , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  J. Irwin,et al.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Gareth Jones,et al.  A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[20]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.