Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.

In the present study we investigated whether the visually allocated "beam" studied by Posner and others is the same visual attentional resource that performs the role of feature integration in Treisman's model. Subjects were cued to attend to a certain spatial location by a visual cue, and performance at expected and unexpected stimulus locations was compared. Subjects searched for a target letter (R) with distractor letters that either could give rise to illusory conjunctions (PQ) or could not (PB). Results from three separate experiments showed that orienting attention in response to central cues (endogenous orienting) showed similar effects for both conjunction and feature search. However, when attention was oriented with peripheral visual cues (exogenous orienting), conjunction search showed larger effects of attention than did feature search. It is suggested that the attentional systems that are oriented in response to central and peripheral cues may not be the same and that only the latter performs a role in feature integration. Possibilities for future research are discussed.

[1]  J. Beck.  Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .

[2]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[3]  J. Beck,et al.  Discriminability of differences in line slope and in line arrangement as a function of mask delay , 1972 .

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[5]  J. Beck.  Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. , 1972, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[7]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[8]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[17]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Shepard,et al.  Distribution of visual attention over space. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field , 1983 .

[21]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  B. Julesz.  A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  B Farell.  Attention in the processing of complex visual displays: detecting features and their combinations. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[25]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[26]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[27]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J. Jonides,et al.  On the Cost and Benefit of Cost and Benefit , 1984 .

[29]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and object perception. , 1984 .

[30]  R. Remington,et al.  Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  G. Shulman,et al.  Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  H. Hughes,et al.  Spatial maps of directed visual attention. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[35]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space , 1987, Neuropsychologia.