A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance.

The role of peers in fostering deviant behavior in adolescence is well-documented in the sociological literature, while support for parental influence or "control" theories of deviance is more equivocal. This paper examines the relative influences of parents and peers on adolescent delinquency and marijuana use, using data from a three-wave panel study of youths who were paired with a best friend (N = 435). Covariance structure models based upon polychoric correlations among study variables reveal that friends are indeed the primary source of influence on youths' behavior, but that estimates of influence are grossly overstated in analyses relying upon respondents' perceptions of their friends' behavior. Parental supervision and attachment are weakly related to subsequent delinquency and marijuana use, lending little support to control theories of deviance. Findings reveal that different processes account for the similarities among members of delinquent and drug-using peer groups. Although youths are socialized into delinquent behavior by peers, both selection and socialization influences play important roles in the formation of drug-using peer groups.

[1]  Dusten R. Hollist,et al.  Causes of Delinquency , 1950, Juvenile Justice.

[2]  G. Patterson.  Persons in context: Family process: loops, levels, and linkages , 1989 .

[3]  M. Sobel.  Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[4]  M. Krohn,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of an Integrated Social Process Model of Deviant Behavior , 1986 .

[5]  David Matza,et al.  Delinquency and Drift , 1966 .

[6]  J. S. Long,et al.  Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL , 1983 .

[7]  J. Short,et al.  Gang delinquency and delinquent subcultures , 1970 .

[8]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Peer Influences on Aspirations: A Reinterpretation , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives , 1986 .

[10]  K. Bauman,et al.  Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. , 1993, Journal of health and social behavior.

[11]  J. Fox,et al.  Effect Analysis in Structural-Equation Models II , 1985 .

[12]  D. Kandel.  Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  David Matza.  Delinquency and Drift , 1966 .

[14]  S. Bahr,et al.  Test of a Bonding/Association Theory of Adolescent Drug Use , 1986 .

[15]  Ronald C. Kessler,et al.  Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis , 1978, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[16]  L. A. Fisher,et al.  Influence and Selection In the Friend-adolescent Relationship: Findings from Studies of Adolescent Smoking and Drinking1 , 1988 .

[17]  A. Liska,et al.  Ties to Conventional Institutions and Delinquency: Estimating Reciprocal Effects. , 1985 .

[18]  R. Jessor,et al.  Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development: A Longitudinal Study , 1978 .

[19]  J. Coleman.  The Adolescent Society , 1961 .

[20]  A. Freud,et al.  The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child , 1949 .

[21]  Steven S. Martin,et al.  Pathways to adolescent drug use: self-derogation, peer influence, weakening of social controls, and early substance use. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[22]  S. Danish,et al.  Peer drug associations and emotional restraint: causes or consequences of adolescents' drug use? , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[23]  M. Krohn,et al.  Testing Interactional Theory: An Examination of Reciprocal Causal Relationships among Family, School, and Delinquency , 1991 .

[24]  Robert F. Meier,et al.  Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity , 1977 .

[25]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use , 1985 .

[26]  F. Lorenz,et al.  TWO ROUTES TO DELINQUENCY: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE STARTERS IN THE IMPACT OF PARENTING AND DEVIANT PEERS* , 1994 .

[27]  B. Muthén.  A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators , 1984 .

[28]  D. Steven.  How Much Income Is Enough? Measuring Public Judgments , 1985 .

[29]  R Jessor,et al.  Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[30]  E. E. Maccoby.  Socialization and Developmental Change. , 1984 .

[31]  D. Relles,et al.  Theory Testing in a World of Constrained Research Design , 1990 .

[32]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Introduction to Structural Equation Models. , 1977 .

[33]  Jere M. Cohen.  Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .

[34]  Robert Agnew,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of Social Control Theory and Delinquency , 1991 .

[35]  D. Osgood,et al.  The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. , 1988 .

[36]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[37]  Finis Welch,et al.  What Do We Really Know about Wages? The Importance of Nonreporting and Census Imputation , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[39]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. , 1979, American sociological review.

[40]  R. Berk.  An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. , 1983 .

[41]  R. Aseltine,et al.  Depression and the social developmental context of adolescence. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  G. Jensen,et al.  Parents, Peers, and Delinquent Action: A Test of the Differential Association Perspective , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  T. Hirschi.  Causes of Delinquency. , 1970, British medical journal.

[44]  T. Dishion,et al.  CONTRIBUTIONS OF FAMILIES AND PEERS TO DELINQUENCY , 1985 .

[45]  D. Cressey,et al.  Principles of Criminology. , 1947 .

[46]  James F. Wilson.  The Moral Sense , 1994 .

[47]  R. Matsueda.  Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach. , 1982 .

[48]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Developmental variation in the context of marijuana initiation among adolescents. , 1990, Journal of health and social behavior.