Use of word length information in utterance planning

Abstract Griffin [Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 , 603–609.] found that speakers naming object pairs spent more time before utterance onset looking at the second object when the first object name was short than when it was long. She proposed that this reversed length effect arose because the speakers’ decision when to initiate an utterance was based, in part, on their estimate of the spoken duration of the first object name and the time available during its articulation to plan the second object name. In Experiment 1 of the present study, participants named object pairs. They spent more time looking at the first object when its name was monosyllabic than when it was trisyllabic, and, as in Griffin’s study, the average gaze-speech lag (the time between the end of the gaze to the first object and onset of its name, which corresponds closely to the pre-speech inspection time for the second object) showed a reversed length effect. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that this effect was not due to a trade-off between the time speakers spent looking at the first and second object before speech onset. Experiment 4 yielded a reversed length effect when the second object was replaced by a symbol ( x or +), which the participants had to categorise. We propose a novel account of the reversed length effect, which links it to the incremental nature of phonological encoding and articulatory planning rather than the speaker’s estimate of the length of the first object name.

[1]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[2]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .

[5]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[6]  A. Ellis Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[7]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The preparation of syllables in speech production , 2004 .

[8]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Selective Impairment of Phonological Processing in Speech Production , 2000, Brain and Language.

[9]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[10]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[12]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon , 1966 .

[13]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production , 2006, Cognition.

[14]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[15]  Z. Griffin Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[16]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[17]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention and Gaze Control in Picture Naming, Word Reading, and Word Categorizing. , 2007 .

[18]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Utterance format affects phonological priming in the picture-word task: implications for models of phonological encoding in speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .

[20]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[21]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking , 2004 .

[22]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[23]  R. Johnston,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .

[24]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[25]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Error Monitoring in Speech Production: A Computational Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming , 2000 .

[28]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Modelling the control of visual attention in Stroop-like tasks , 2007 .

[29]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  A. Meyer,et al.  Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[33]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Syllabification in Speech Production: Evaluation of WEAVER , 1997 .

[34]  Aditi Lahiri,et al.  The minimal unit of phonological encoding: prosodic or lexical word , 2002, Cognition.

[35]  A. Meyer Conceptual Influences on Grammatical Planning Units , 1997 .

[36]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[37]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[38]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Parallelism in the Production of Noun Phrases: Experiments and Reaction Time Models. , 1999 .

[40]  W. Levelt Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations , 1992, Cognition.

[41]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Speakers gaze at objects while preparing intentionally inaccurate labels for them. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[43]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[44]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000 .

[45]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations , 2002 .

[46]  E. Saffran,et al.  Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production , 2005, Cognition.

[47]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .

[48]  A. Meyer The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation , 2004 .

[49]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? , 2001, Cognition.

[50]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[52]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis , 2005, Cognition.

[53]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[54]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[55]  A. Crompton,et al.  Syllables and segments in speech production , 1981 .

[56]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  G. Dell,et al.  Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. , 1997, Psychological review.

[59]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures and sums , 2003 .

[60]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[61]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[62]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[63]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[64]  A. Cutler Slips of the Tongue and Language Production , 1982 .

[65]  H. Schriefers Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases , 1993 .

[66]  D. Plaut,et al.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production , 1999, Cognition.

[68]  V. Fromkin Speech errors as linguistic evidence , 1976 .

[69]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks , 2004 .

[70]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[71]  A. Postma Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models , 2000, Cognition.

[72]  T. Hartley,et al.  A Linguistically Constrained Model of Short-Term Memory for Nonwords ☆ , 1996 .

[73]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Serial Order in Planning the Production of Successive Morphemes of a Word , 1996 .

[74]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production : Verb-particle combinations , 1998 .

[75]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.

[76]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .

[77]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study. , 1998 .

[78]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? , 1970 .

[79]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and the Locus of Repetition Priming of Picture Naming , 2001 .

[80]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Automaticity and control in Language Processing , 2007 .

[81]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[83]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[84]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[85]  H. Schriefers Phonological Facilitation in the Production of Two-word Utterances , 1999 .

[86]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[87]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[88]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[89]  D. E. Irwin Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing , 2004 .

[90]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .