Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes

Senior leaders increasingly embed paradoxes into their organization's strategy, but struggle to manage them effectively. To better understand how they do so, I compared in-depth qualitative data from six top management teams exploring and exploiting simultaneously. The results informed a model of dynamic decision making in which strategic paradoxes can be effectively engaged. The details of this dynamic decision-making model extend and complicate our understanding of managing paradoxes by depicting dilemmas and paradoxes as interwoven, explicating a consistently inconsistent pattern of addressing tensions, and framing both differentiating and integrating practices as necessary for engaging paradox.

[1]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  A Strategy Of Decision Policy Evaluation As A Social Process , 2016 .

[2]  Marya L. Besharov.  The Relational Ecology of Identification: How Organizational Identification Emerges When Individuals Hold Divergent Values , 2014 .

[3]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications , 2014 .

[4]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve , 2013 .

[5]  Jason T Jay,et al.  Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations , 2013 .

[6]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[7]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .

[8]  Michael A. Genovese,et al.  Leadership Matters: Unleashing the Power of Paradox , 2012 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational Sustainability: Organization Design and Senior Leadership to Enable Strategic Paradox , 2011 .

[11]  E. Naveh,et al.  The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox , 2011 .

[12]  Dorothy A. Leonard,et al.  Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development , 2011 .

[13]  Joshua Keller,et al.  The Cultural Category of Cooperation: A Cultural Consensus Model Analysis for China and the United States , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[15]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational designs and innovation streams , 2010 .

[16]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses , 2010 .

[17]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[18]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously , 2010 .

[19]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity , 2009 .

[23]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts , 2009 .

[27]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Acting Globally but Thinking Locally? The Enduring Influence of Local Communities on Organizations , 2009 .

[28]  H. Tikkanen,et al.  Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival , 2009 .

[29]  Karen Locke,et al.  Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  An Identity-based View of Emotional Ambivalence and its Management in Organizations , 2008 .

[31]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process , 2008 .

[32]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[33]  H. Takeuchi.  The contradictions that drive Toyotas success , 2008 .

[34]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[36]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[37]  John Kyle Dorton,et al.  Extreme Toyota : radical contradictions that drive success at the world's best manufacturer , 2008 .

[38]  Roger Martin.  The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking , 2007 .

[39]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  A Rhetoric-in-Context Approach to Building Commitment to Multiple Strategic Goals , 2007 .

[40]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[41]  A. Langley.  Process thinking in strategic organization , 2007 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strategy into Action , 2007 .

[43]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[44]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[45]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[47]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Dynamic Delegation: Shared, Hierarchical, and Deindividualized Leadership in Extreme Action Teams , 2006 .

[48]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[49]  A Smith,et al.  Organizing dualities and strategizing for change , 2006 .

[50]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[51]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  When values backfire: Leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization , 2006 .

[52]  Joseph L. Bower,et al.  From resource allocation to strategy , 2005 .

[53]  C. Gilbert.  Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[54]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach , 2005 .

[55]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[56]  S. Maitlis.  The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking. , 2005 .

[57]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off , 2004 .

[59]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[60]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Taking Strategy Seriously , 2003 .

[61]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance , 2003 .

[62]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[63]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[64]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm , 2002 .

[65]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[66]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[67]  Q. Huy.  Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers , 2002 .

[68]  Patricia H. Thornton.  The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics , 2002 .

[69]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational Technology: Technological Change, Ambidextrous Organizations and Organizational Evolution , 2002 .

[70]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[71]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[72]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[73]  M. Glynn.  When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra , 2000 .

[74]  Willow A. Sheremata.  Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[75]  J. H. Gittell.  Paradox of Coordination and Control , 2000 .

[76]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[77]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[78]  D. Sull.  The Dynamics of Standing Still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the Radial Revolution , 1999, Business History Review.

[79]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[80]  L. Donaldson.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[81]  F. Vella,et al.  The power of mindful learning , 1997 .

[82]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[83]  M. Hatch.  Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team , 1997 .

[84]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[85]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Built to last: successful habits of visionary companies , 1997 .

[86]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[87]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives And Their Effects On Organizations , 1996 .

[88]  Russ Vince,et al.  Paradox, Defense and Attachment: Accessing and Working with Emotions and Relations Underlying Organizational Change , 1996 .

[89]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[90]  I. Mitroff.  The age of paradox , 1994 .

[91]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[92]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[93]  Mary Jo Hatch,et al.  Spontaneous Humour as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations , 1993 .

[94]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[95]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[96]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Designing Organizations that Have Good Fit: A Framework for Understanding New Architectures , 1992 .

[97]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Motivation and personality: Conceptual/integrative complexity , 1992 .

[98]  Charles P. Smith.  Motivation and personality: Name Index , 1992 .

[99]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String Quartets , 1991 .

[100]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[101]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[102]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[103]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[104]  J. Ford,et al.  Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. , 1988 .

[105]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[106]  L. Gruenfeld,et al.  Paradoxes of group life , 1987 .

[107]  K. Cameron.  Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[108]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[109]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[110]  E. Langer,et al.  Premature cognitive commitment. , 1981, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[111]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[112]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Sociological ambivalence and other essays , 1976 .

[113]  Patrick Hughes,et al.  Vicious Circles and Infinity: A Panoply of Paradoxes , 1975 .

[114]  H. Kunkel.  GENERAL INTRODUCTION , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[115]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[116]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[117]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[118]  Philip Selznick.  Leadership in administration , 1957 .

[119]  V E FRANKL,et al.  [Paradoxical intention]. , 1956, Zeitschrift fur Psychotherapie und medizinische Psychologie.

[120]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .