Field evaluation of particulate matter measurements using tapered element oscillating microbalance in a layer house

The tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) is one type of continuous ambient particulate matter (PM) monitor. Adsorption and desorption of moisture and semivolatile species may cause positive or negative artifacts in TEOM PM mass measurement. The objective of this field study was to investigate possible uncertainties associated with TEOM measurements in the poultry operation environment. For comparisons of TEOM with filter-based gravimetric method, four instruments (TEOM-PM10, low-volume PM10 sampler, TEOM-PM2.5, and PM2.5 speciation sampler) were collocated and tested inside a poultry house for PM2.5 and PM10 (PM with aerodynamic equivalent diameter ≤2.5 and ≤10 μm, respectively) measurements. Fifteen sets of 24-hr PM10 concentrations and 13 sets of 24-hr PM2.5 measurements were obtained. Results indicate that compared with filter-based gravimetric method, TEOM gave significantly lower values of both PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations. For PM10, the average ratio of TEOM to the gravimetric method was 0.936. For PM2.5, the average ratio of TEOM to the gravimetric method was 0.738. Particulate matter in the poultry houses possibly contains semivolatile compounds and moisture due to high levels of relative humidity (RH) and gas pollutants. The internal heating mechanism of the TEOM may cause losses in mass through volatilization. To investigate the effects of TEOM settings on concentration measurements, the heaters of two identical TEOMs were set at 50 °C, 30 °C, or no heating at all. They were collocated and tested for total suspended particle (TSP), PM10, and PM2.5 measurements in layer house for 6 weeks. For all TSP, PM10, and PM2.5 measurements, the internal TEOM temperature setting had a significant effect (P < 0.05). Significantly higher PM mass concentrations were measured at lower temperature settings. The effects of environmental (i.e., temperature, RH, NH3 and CO2 concentrations) and instrumental (i.e., filter loading and noise) parameters on PM measurements were also assessed using regression analysis. Implications Because of its potential health and environmental effects, particulate matter (PM) emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs) have been a great concern to the public and to the regulatory agencies. The tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) PM monitor has been was adapted for continuous PM measurements in some AFO air quality studies. This study investigated possible uncertainties associated with TEOM measurements in an egg production environment. It was discovered that there was a significant bias in TEOM measurements of PM10 as compared with federal reference method. Internal temperature settings of a TEOM have significant impact on its PM measurement.

[1]  C. Chree,et al.  [Letters to Editor] , 1925, Nature.

[2]  Harvey Patashnick,et al.  Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance , 1990 .

[3]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[4]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  C. F. Rogers,et al.  Real-Time Liquid Water Mass Measurement for Airborne Particulates , 1998 .

[6]  R. Mackie,et al.  Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[7]  John L. Gras,et al.  TEOM vs. manual gravimetric methods for determination of PM2.5 aerosol mass concentrations , 1999 .

[8]  James N. Pitts,et al.  Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications , 1999 .

[9]  Joan Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives , 2000 .

[10]  David Muir,et al.  New Directions: The suitability of tapered element oscillating microbalances (TEOMs) for PM10 monitoring in Europe. The use of PM10 data as measured by TEOM for compliance with the European Air Quality Standard☆ , 2000 .

[11]  T. Pless-mulloli,et al.  New Directions: TEOMs and the volatility of UK non-urban PM10: a regulatory dilemma , 2000 .

[12]  D. Green,et al.  Evaluation of TEOMTM ‘correction factors’ for assessing the EU Stage 1 limit values for PM10 , 2001 .

[13]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Measurement of particulate matter from diesel engine exhaust using a tapered element oscillating microbalance , 2001 .

[14]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Evaluation and correction of moisture adsorption and desorption from a tapered element oscillating microbalance , 2001 .

[15]  J. Ambs,et al.  Development of a Reference Standard for Particulate Matter Mass in Ambient Air , 2001 .

[16]  J. Chow,et al.  Comparison of continuous and filter based mass measurements in Mexico City , 2003 .

[17]  P. Scheff,et al.  Adjusting Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Data for Comparison with Federal Reference Method PM2.5 Measurements in Region 5 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  M. Meyer,et al.  A comparison of PM10 monitors at a Kerbside site in the northeast of England , 2003 .

[19]  J. Ambs,et al.  Long-Term Field Characterization of Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance and Modified Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Samplers in Urban and Rural New York State Locations , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  J. Roush Letters to the , 2004 .

[21]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Differential TEOM Monitor for Continuous PM2.5 Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[22]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments , 2004 .

[23]  P. Hopke,et al.  Evaluation of Continuous and Filter-Based Methods for Measuring PM2.5 Mass Concentration , 2005 .

[24]  B. Slattery,et al.  Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs; National Research Council of the National Academies; The National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 2003, 286 pages, paperback, ISBN 0-309-08705-8 (US$ 46) , 2005 .

[25]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[26]  Calvin B. Parnell,et al.  PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF A LOW-VOLUME PM10 SAMPLER , 2005 .

[27]  Steven J. Hoff,et al.  Quality-Assured Measurements of Animal Building Emissions: Particulate Matter Concentrations , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[28]  D. Green,et al.  The implications of tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) software configuration on particulate matter measurements in the UK and europe , 2006 .

[29]  J. Chow,et al.  Comparison of Continuous and Filter-Based Carbon Measurements at the Fresno Supersite , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[30]  S. Hoff,et al.  Comparison of Measured Total Suspended Particulate Matter Concentrations Using Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance and a Total Suspended Particulate Sampler , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  R. P. Vinson,et al.  Thermally induced filter bias in TEOM mass measurement. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[32]  H. Xin,et al.  Speciation of volatile organic compounds from poultry production , 2010 .

[33]  R. K. M. Jayanty,et al.  FINE PARTICULATE MATTER IN A HIGH-RISE LAYER HOUSE AND ITS VICINITY , 2011 .