Analysis and comparison on thermodynamic and economic performances of an organic Rankine cycle with constant and one-dimensional dynamic turbine efficiency

Abstract Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) has been demonstrated to be an effective and promising technology to recover low-grade heat source. Constant turbine efficiency is generally assumed in most of ORC studies, which is not necessarily accurate. To address this issue, a one-dimensional analysis model of radial-inflow turbine is presented. A comparative analysis of the thermodynamic and economic performances of ORC system with constant turbine efficiency and dynamic turbine efficiency is conducted for eight working fluids. The multi-objective grey wolf optimizer (MOGWO) is employed to conduct the multi-objective optimization of the ORC system with constant turbine efficiency and dynamic turbine efficiency. The optimization results are analyzed and compared to investigate the effects of the turbine efficiency on the working fluid selection and system parameters determination. A comparative analysis of the off-design performance of the ORC system with both types of turbine efficiency is also carried out, and the influence of the heat source inlet temperature on the multi-objective optimization results of the ORC system is also studied. The results show that the turbine efficiency increases with the decrement of evaporation temperature or the increment of condensation temperature, and there are significant differences of turbine efficiency among different working fluids. The optimal working fluid and operating parameters are different between the ORC system with constant and dynamic turbine efficiency. Isopentane and pentane are considered to be the optimal working fluids for the constant turbine efficiency ORC system, while only pentane is considered to be the optimal working fluid for the dynamic turbine efficiency ORC system. As the heat source inlet temperature increases, the difference in the optimal evaporation temperature and the net power output between the two ORC systems increases and the error caused by adopting constant turbine efficiency increase accordingly.

[1]  Markus Preißinger,et al.  Exergoeconomic optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle for low-temperature geothermal heat sources , 2012 .

[2]  Hongguang Zhang,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analysis of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) for diesel engine waste heat recovery with a fin-and-tube evaporator , 2015 .

[3]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  Thermoeconomic comparison between pure and mixture working fluids of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[4]  Wei Liu,et al.  Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycles – Impact of uncertainty of fluid properties , 2016 .

[5]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery using evolutionary algorithm , 2013 .

[6]  Pradeep Jangir,et al.  A new Non-Dominated Sorting Grey Wolf Optimizer (NS-GWO) algorithm: Development and application to solve engineering designs and economic constrained emission dispatch problem with integration of wind power , 2018, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Guoquan Qiu,et al.  Selection of working fluids for micro-CHP systems with ORC , 2012 .

[8]  Minggao Ouyang,et al.  Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery , 2011 .

[9]  Lisheng Pan,et al.  Improved analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle based on radial flow turbine , 2013 .

[10]  Josua P. Meyer,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis and performance optimization of organic rankine cycles for the conversion of low‐to‐moderate grade geothermal heat , 2015 .

[11]  Qibin Li,et al.  Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid , 2018 .

[12]  Wencheng Fu,et al.  Performance optimization of low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles using axial turbine isentropic efficiency correlation , 2018 .

[13]  Zhen Pan,et al.  Machine learning predictive framework for CO2 thermodynamic properties in solution , 2018, Journal of CO2 Utilization.

[14]  Anthony C. Jones Design and Test of a Small, High Pressure Ratio Radial Turbine , 1994 .

[15]  Zineb Fergani,et al.  Multi-criteria exergy based optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery in the cement industry , 2016 .

[16]  A. Abusoglu,et al.  Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) adapted to an existing solid waste power plant , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[17]  Richard Turton,et al.  Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes , 2002 .

[18]  Guo Tao,et al.  Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation , 2011 .

[19]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Charge-sensitive modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems for off-design performance simulation , 2018 .

[20]  Mohammad Hosein Kazemi,et al.  An optimal autonomous microgrid cluster based on distributed generation droop parameter optimization and renewable energy sources using an improved grey wolf optimizer , 2017 .

[21]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Thermal design and optimization , 1995 .

[22]  R. V. Rao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of the Stirling heat engine through self-adaptive Jaya algorithm , 2017 .

[23]  Lan Xiao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of evaporation and condensation temperatures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle , 2015 .

[24]  Jian Fu,et al.  An Improved Modeling for Low-grade Organic Rankine Cycle Coupled with Optimization Design of Radial-inflow Turbine , 2017 .

[25]  M. Orosz,et al.  Economic optimization of Organic Rankine cycle with pure fluids and mixtures for waste heat and solar applications using particle swarm optimization method , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[26]  J. Van Roy,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Ranki , 2010 .

[27]  Chun-wei Gu,et al.  Parametric design and off-design analysis of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system , 2016 .

[28]  A. Grönman,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation on the effect of working fluid type and fluids critical properties on design and performance of Organic Rankine Cycles , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[29]  I. Dincer,et al.  Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization of geothermal organic Rankine cycle , 2013 .

[30]  Y.P. Li,et al.  A flexible-possibilistic stochastic programming method for planning municipal-scale energy system through introducing renewable energies and electric vehicles , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  V. Zare,et al.  A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants , 2015 .

[32]  Mikhail Sorin,et al.  Reconstruction procedure of the thermodynamic cycle of organic Rankine cycles (ORC) and selection of the most appropriate working fluid , 2018 .

[33]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization and grey relational analysis on configurations of organic Rankine cycle , 2017 .

[34]  Xu Han,et al.  Thermo-Economic Performance Analysis of a Regenerative Superheating Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery , 2017 .

[35]  Wenhua Li,et al.  Operation optimization of an organic rankine cycle (ORC) heat recovery power plant , 2011 .

[36]  Christos N. Markides,et al.  Thermo-Economic and Heat Transfer Optimization of Working-Fluid Mixtures in a Low-Temperature Organic Rankine Cycle System † , 2016 .

[37]  Chun-wei Gu,et al.  Influence of the radial-inflow turbine efficiency prediction on the design and analysis of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system , 2016 .

[38]  José María Ponce-Ortega,et al.  A multi-objective optimization approach for the selection of working fluids of geothermal facilities: Economic, environmental and social aspects. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Hany M. Hasanien,et al.  Single and Multi-objective Optimal Power Flow Using Grey Wolf Optimizer and Differential Evolution Algorithms , 2015 .

[40]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems , 2006 .

[41]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Grey Wolf Optimizer , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[42]  Chun-Mei Wu,et al.  Economical evaluation and optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on temperature matching analysis , 2014 .

[43]  Vignesh Pethurajan,et al.  Issues, comparisons, turbine selections and applications – An overview in organic Rankine cycle , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[44]  Rambod Rayegan,et al.  A procedure to select working fluids for Solar Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) , 2011 .

[45]  Raya Al-Dadah,et al.  Modelling and optimization of organic Rankine cycle based on a small-scale radial inflow turbine , 2015 .

[46]  Ayad Al Jubori,et al.  Development of micro-scale axial and radial turbines for low-temperature heat source driven organic Rankine cycle , 2016 .

[47]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles , 2011 .

[48]  Jianchao Cai,et al.  Progress in enhancement of CO2 absorption by nanofluids: A mini review of mechanisms and current status , 2018 .

[49]  Man-Hoe Kim,et al.  Exergetic and heat load optimization of high temperature organic Rankine cycle , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[50]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  The optimal evaporation temperature and working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle , 2012 .

[51]  Zhonghe Han,et al.  Improved thermodynamic design of organic radial-inflow turbine and ORC system thermal performance analysis , 2017 .

[52]  E. Stefanakos,et al.  A REVIEW OF THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES AND WORKING FLUIDS FOR THE CONVERSION OF LOW-GRADE HEAT , 2010 .